5.9 KiB
Before disabling any content in relation to this takedown notice, GitHub
- contacted the owners of some or all of the affected repositories to give them an opportunity to make changes.
- provided information on how to submit a DMCA Counter Notice.
To learn about when and why GitHub may process some notices this way, please visit our README.
Are you the copyright holder or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf?
Yes, I am the copyright holder.
Are you submitting a revised DMCA notice after GitHub Trust & Safety requested you make changes to your original notice?
No
Does your claim involve content on GitHub or npm.js?
GitHub
Please describe the nature of your copyright ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.
I [private] ProtoHax, an open-source Minecraft: PE cheat licensed under the GPLv3
Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.
I am the [private] and copyright holder of an open-source software project called [name of project]. It is licensed under the GPLv3 and the source code is available at https://github.com/hax0r31337/ProtoHax-Android/ and https://github.com/hax0r31337/ProtoHax/.
An individual/entity known as "the infriger" has released a closed-source, obfuscated version of my project on GitHub without following the open source license terms. They have not provided attribution, made their source available, or met any of the other license requirements, which represents a violation of my copyright.
What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository’s URL.
https://github.com/CloudPixel-Studio/ProtoHax-Release
Do you claim to have any technological measures in place to control access to your copyrighted content? Please see our Complaints about Anti-Circumvention Technology if you are unsure.
No
Have you searched for any forks of the allegedly infringing files or repositories? Each fork is a distinct repository and must be identified separately if you believe it is infringing and wish to have it taken down.
https://github.com/ASAFAIS31/ProtoHax-Release https://github.com/SuryaPratapBipul/ProtoHax-Release
Is the work licensed under an open source license?
Yes
Which license?
GPLv3
How do you believe the license is being violated?
- Conveying Modified Source Versions.
You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date.
b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is released under this License and any conditions added under section 7. This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to "keep intact all notices".
c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy. This License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7 additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts, regardless of how they are packaged. This License gives no permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.
d) If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your work need not make them do so.
A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work, and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit. Inclusion of a covered work in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other parts of the aggregate.
What changes can be made to bring the project into compliance with the license? For example, adding attribution, adding a license, making the repository private.
Make the so-called "fork" open-source under the GPLv3 license instead of close source and obfuscated
What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement?
Repository can be made private
Do you have the alleged infringer’s contact information? If so, please provide it.
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law.
I have taken fair use into consideration.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Submitting a DMCA Takedown Notice.
So that we can get back to you, please provide either your telephone number or physical address.
[private]
Please type your full legal name below to sign this request.
[private]