6.2 KiB
One or more repositories in this DMCA takedown notice has been processed in accordance with GitHub’s prohibition on sharing unauthorized product licensing keys, software for generating unauthorized product licensing keys, and/or software for bypassing checks for product licensing keys. You can learn more in GitHub’s Acceptable Use Policies.
While GitHub did not find sufficient information to determine a valid anti-circumvention claim, we determined that this takedown notice contains other valid copyright claim(s).
Are you the copyright holder or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf?
Yes, I am authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
Are you submitting a revised DMCA notice after GitHub Trust & Safety requested you make changes to your original notice?
No
Does your claim involve content on GitHub or npm.js?
GitHub
Please describe the nature of your copyright ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.
Dear Github team,
I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Filing a DMCA Notice.
As the WebPros [private], I represent WebPros International GmbH (formerly Plesk International GmbH) ,[private] as the owner of all intellectual property (incl. IP in the source code, trademarks and copyrights) belonging to Plesk software products.
The obvious way such user offers cracked / pirated license information on Github makes a direct approach of the user by WebPros obsolete.
WebPros hereby kindly requests a take-down of the Plesk crack under the aforementioned link and, if possible, a block of the originator due to the fact that he openly offers IP-infringing materials on your platform.
The WebPros [private] is at your disposition for further questions and is ready to provide what is required to immediately stop this infringement of its rights in its products.
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the infringing account and forks is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into consideration.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner of an exclusive right that is infringed.
Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.
The infringed product is Plesk software, available for licensing under www.plesk.com.
The present takedown notice is directed against a crack of our proprietary software, allowing users to use it without first obtaining a (royalty-bearing) license from WebPros.
What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository’s URL.
https://github.com/7054company/plesk-unlimited-license
with active forks at:
https://github.com/remember19890604/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/ais1175/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/famxpro/Plesk_Auto_Update_Trial_Key
https://github.com/sycomix/plesk-unlimited-license
Inactive Forks:
https://github.com/aisling-io/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/albhost/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/anjasamar/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/Cyd3nt/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/dursuntokgoz/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/I2-Network-Technologies/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/MoriEdan/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/oinandocosta/plesk-unlimited-license
https://github.com/Zer0Down/plesk-unlimited-license
Do you claim to have any technological measures in place to control access to your copyrighted content? Please see our Complaints about Anti-Circumvention Technology if you are unsure.
Yes
What technological measures do you have in place and how do they effectively control access to your copyrighted material?
State of the art encryption of our proprietary source code to protect it from being decrypted and shared with others.
How is the accused project designed to circumvent your technological protection measures?
The software offered on GitHub is cracked software / licenses which do not require a valid license key to function. The key verification has been disabled / modified.
Have you searched for any forks of the allegedly infringing files or repositories? Each fork is a distinct repository and must be identified separately if you believe it is infringing and wish to have it taken down.
All known forks of the infringing material have been listed above.
Is the work licensed under an open source license?
No
What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement?
Reported content must be removed
Do you have the alleged infringer’s contact information? If so, please provide it.
WebPros is not able to retrieve information about the infringing users.
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law.
I have taken fair use into consideration.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Submitting a DMCA Takedown Notice.
So that we can get back to you, please provide either your telephone number or physical address.
WebPros International GmbH, [private], [private] / [private]
[private] , [private] ([private]) , Phone : [private]
Please type your full legal name below to sign this request.
WebPros International GmbH (represented by its [private], [private])