5.8 KiB
Before disabling any content in relation to this takedown notice, GitHub
- contacted the owners of some or all of the affected repositories to give them an opportunity to make changes.
- provided information on how to submit a DMCA Counter Notice.
To learn about when and why GitHub may process some notices this way, please visit our README.
Are you the copyright holder or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf?
Yes, I am the copyright holder.
Are you submitting a revised DMCA notice after GitHub Trust & Safety requested you make changes to your original notice?
No
Does your claim involve content on GitHub or npm.js?
GitHub
Please describe the nature of your copyright ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.
Copyright ownership is to "Copyright (c) 2018-2023, the 'flutter_map' authors and maintainers". I am an [private] flutter_map [private].
Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.
flutter_map (https://github.com/fleaflet/flutter_map) is a library to primarily display geographical maps from a tile-based convention/format, with other related functionality, such as management of Coordinate Reference Systems, for the Flutter framework in the Dart language ecosystem.
What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository’s URL.
https://github.com/cts-cts/cts_flutter_map-6.0.0
Do you claim to have any technological measures in place to control access to your copyrighted content? Please see our Complaints about Anti-Circumvention Technology if you are unsure.
No
Have you searched for any forks of the allegedly infringing files or repositories? Each fork is a distinct repository and must be identified separately if you believe it is infringing and wish to have it taken down.
Yes, there are no forks.
Is the work licensed under an open source license?
Yes
Which license?
BSD 3-Clause License
Copyright (c) 2018-2023, the 'flutter_map' authors and maintainers
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
-
Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
-
Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
-
Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
How do you believe the license is being violated?
Violates condition 1:
"Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer."
They have modified the original copyright notice, replacing the authors.
What changes can be made to bring the project into compliance with the license? For example, adding attribution, adding a license, making the repository private.
Restoration of the original license, as is required.
Preferably, they would also delete the existing repo, and recreate it as a fork, but this is not mandatory.
What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement?
Other Change
Describe the change.
Restoration of the original license, as is required.
Preferably, they would also delete the existing repo, and recreate it as a fork, but this is not mandatory.
Do you have the alleged infringer’s contact information? If so, please provide it.
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law.
I have taken fair use into consideration.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Submitting a DMCA Takedown Notice.
So that we can get back to you, please provide either your telephone number or physical address.
[private]
Please type your full legal name below to sign this request.
[private]