r361845 changed the way we handle "D16" vs. "D32" targets; there used to
be a negative "d16" which removed instructions from the instruction set,
and now there's a "d32" feature which adds instructions to the
instruction set. This is good, but there was an oversight in the
implementation: the behavior of VFPv2 was changed. In particular, the
"vfp2" feature was changed to imply "d32". This is wrong: VFPv2 only
supports 16 D registers.
In practice, this means if you specify -mfpu=vfpv2, the compiler will
generate illegal instructions.
This patch gets rid of "vfp2d16" and "vfp2d16sp", and fixes "vfp2" and
"vfp2sp" so they don't imply "d32".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67375
llvm-svn: 372186
This adds:
- LLVM subtarget features to make all the new instructions conditional on,
- CPU and FPU names for use on clang's command line, with default FPUs set
so that "armv8.1-m.main+fp" and "armv8.1-m.main+fp.dp" will select the right
FPU features,
- architecture extension names "mve" and "mve.fp",
- ABI build attribute support for v8.1-M (a new value for Tag_CPU_arch) and MVE
(a new actual tag).
Patch mostly by Simon Tatham.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60698
llvm-svn: 362090
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
Part of the effort to refactoring frame pointer code generation. We used
to use two function attributes "no-frame-pointer-elim" and
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" to represent three kinds of frame
pointer usage: (all) frames use frame pointer, (non-leaf) frames use
frame pointer, (none) frame use frame pointer. This CL makes the idea
explicit by using only one enum function attribute "frame-pointer"
Option "-frame-pointer=" replaces "-disable-fp-elim" for tools such as
llc.
"no-frame-pointer-elim" and "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" are still
supported for easy migration to "frame-pointer".
tests are mostly updated with
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim=false’ with ‘-frame-pointer=none’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim=false' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim=false/-frame-pointer=none/g"
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim’ with ‘-frame-pointer=all’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim/-frame-pointer=all/g"
Patch by Yuanfang Chen (tabloid.adroit)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56351
llvm-svn: 351049
This sets target feature FeatureStrictAlign for Armv6-m and Armv8-m.baseline,
because it has no support for unaligned accesses.
It looks like we always pass target feature "+strict-align" from
Clang, so this is not a user facing problem, but querying the subtarget
(in e.g. llc) for unaligned access support is incorrect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48437
llvm-svn: 335326
This will allow compilation of assembly files targeting armv7e-m without having
to specify the Tag_CPU_arch attribute as a workaround.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40370
Patch by Ian Tessier!
llvm-svn: 319303
I doubt anyone actually uses it, and I'm not even entirely convinced it exists
myself; but it is our default for "clang -arch armv6". Functionally, if it does
exist it's identical to the arm1176jz-f from LLVM's point of view (the
difference is apparently in the "Security Extensions").
llvm-svn: 301962
In the assembler, we should emit build attributes based on the target
selected with command-line options. This matches the GNU assembler's
behaviour. We only do this for build attributes which describe the
hardware that is expected to be available, not the ones that describe
ABI compatibility.
This is done by moving some of the attribute emission code to
ARMTargetStreamer, so that it can be shared between the assembly and
code-generation code paths. Since the assembler only creates a
MCSubtargetInfo, not an ARMSubtarget, the code had to be changed to
check raw features, and not use the convenience functions in
ARMSubtarget.
If different attributes are later specified using the .eabi_attribute
directive, then they will take precedence, as happens when the same
.eabi_attribute is specified twice.
This must be enabled by an option, because we don't want to do this when
parsing inline assembly. The attributes would match the ones emitted at
the start of the file, so wouldn't actually change the emitted object
file, but the extra directives would be added to every inline assembly
block when emitting assembly, which we'd like to avoid.
The majority of the changes in the build-attributes.ll test are just
re-ordering the directives, because the hardware attributes are now
emitted before the ABI ones. However, I did fix one bug which I spotted:
Tag_CPU_arch_profile was not being emitted for v6M.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31812
llvm-svn: 300547
Summary:
Host CPU detection now supports Kryo, so we need to recognize it in ARM
target.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover, rengolin, echristo, srhines
Reviewed By: t.p.northover, echristo
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31775
llvm-svn: 299674
Gcc supports target armv7ve which is armv7-a with virtualization
extensions. This change adds support for this in llvm for gcc
compatibility.
Also remove redundant FeatureHWDiv, FeatureHWDivARM for a few models as
this is specified automatically by FeatureVirtualization.
Patch by Manoj Gupta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29472
llvm-svn: 294661
Add both cores to the target parser and TableGen. Test that eabi
attributes are set correctly for both cores. Additionally, test the
absence and presence of MOVT in Cortex-M23 and Cortex-M33, respectively.
Committed on behalf of Sanne Wouda.
Reviewers : rengolin, olista01.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29073
llvm-svn: 293761
types. This is the LLVM counterpart and it adds options that map onto FP
exceptions and denormal build attributes allowing better fp math library
selections.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24070
llvm-svn: 280246
This patch adds support for some new relocation models to the ARM
backend:
* Read-only position independence (ROPI): Code and read-only data is accessed
PC-relative. The offsets between all code and RO data sections are known at
static link time. This does not affect read-write data.
* Read-write position independence (RWPI): Read-write data is accessed relative
to the static base register (r9). The offsets between all writeable data
sections are known at static link time. This does not affect read-only data.
These two modes are independent (they specify how different objects
should be addressed), so they can be used individually or together. They
are otherwise the same as the "static" relocation model, and are not
compatible with SysV-style PIC using a global offset table.
These modes are normally used by bare-metal systems or systems with
small real-time operating systems. They are designed to avoid the need
for a dynamic linker, the only initialisation required is setting r9 to
an appropriate value for RWPI code.
I have only added support to SelectionDAG, not FastISel, because
FastISel is currently disabled for bare-metal targets where these modes
would be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23195
llvm-svn: 278015
Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct
from the others?
This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in
places where we have a user input that still hasn't been maped to the
default value, which is now clear has no be one of the remaining 3
options.
llvm-svn: 269988
This patch adds Cortex-R8 to Target Parser and TableGen.
It also adds CodeGen tests for the build attributes.
Patch by Pablo Barrio.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17925
llvm-svn: 263132
description and changed the regression test accordingly.
The default configuration of a Cortex-R7 is to implement the
VFPv3-D16 architecture and the feature line as it was is too
restrictive.
llvm-svn: 259480
This patch was originally committed as r257885, but was reverted due to windows
failures. The cause of these failures has been fixed under r258677, hence
re-committing the original patch.
llvm-svn: 258683
# The first commit's message is:
Revert "[ARM] Add DSP build attribute and extension targeting"
This reverts commit b11cc50c0b4a7c8cdb628abc50b7dc226ff583dc.
# This is the 2nd commit message:
Revert "[ARM] Add new system registers to ARMv8-M Baseline/Mainline"
This reverts commit 837d08454e3e5beb8581951ac26b22fa07df3cd5.
llvm-svn: 257916
This commit defines subtarget feature strict-align and uses it instead of
cl::opt -arm-strict-align to decide whether strict alignment should be
forced. Also, remove the logic that was checking the OS and architecture
as clang is now responsible for setting strict-align based on the command
line options specified and the target architecute and OS.
rdar://problem/21529937
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11470
llvm-svn: 243493
whether register r9 should be reserved.
This recommits r242737, which broke bots because the number of subtarget
features went over the limit of 64.
This change is needed because we cannot use a backend option to set
cl::opt "arm-reserve-r9" when doing LTO.
Out-of-tree projects currently using cl::opt option "-arm-reserve-r9" to
reserve r9 should make changes to add subtarget feature "reserve-r9" to
the IR.
rdar://problem/21529937
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11320
llvm-svn: 242756
whether register r9 should be reserved.
This change is needed because we cannot use a backend option to set
cl::opt "arm-reserve-r9" when doing LTO.
Out-of-tree projects currently using cl::opt option "-arm-reserve-r9" to
reserve r9 should make changes to add subtarget feature "reserve-r9" to
the IR.
rdar://problem/21529937
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11320
llvm-svn: 242737
Some of the the permissible ARM -mfpu options, which are supported in GCC,
are currently not present in llvm/clang.This patch adds the options:
'neon-fp16', 'vfpv3-fp16', 'vfpv3-d16-fp16', 'vfpv3xd' and 'vfpv3xd-fp16.
These are related to half-precision floating-point and single precision.
Reviewers: rengolin, ranjeet.singh
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10645
llvm-svn: 240930
This patch fixes the error in ARM.td which stated that Cortex-R5
floating point unit can do only single precision, when it can do double as well.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10769
llvm-svn: 240799
Cortex-R4F TRM states that fpu supports both single and double precision.
This patch corrects the information in ARM.td file and corresponding test.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10763
llvm-svn: 240776
ARMTargetParser::getFPUFeatures should disable fp16 whenever it
disables vfp4, as otherwise something like -mcpu=cortex-a7 -mfpu=none
leaves us with fp16 enabled (though the only effect that will have is
a wrong build attribute).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10397
llvm-svn: 239599
These are added mainly for the benefit of clang, but this also means that they
are now allowed in .fpu directives and we emit the correct .fpu directive when
single-precision-only is used.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10238
llvm-svn: 239151
Currently, llvm (backend) doesn't know cortex-r4, even though it is the
default target for armv7r. Using "--target=armv7r-arm-none-eabi" provokes
'cortex-r4' is not a recognized processor for this target' by llvm.
This patch adds support for cortex-r4 and, very closely related, r4f.
llvm-svn: 234486
ARMv6K is another layer between ARMV6 and ARMV6T2. This is the LLVM
side of the changes.
ARMV6 family LLVM implementation.
+-------------------------------------+
| ARMV6 |
+----------------+--------------------+
| ARMV6M (thumb) | ARMV6K (arm,thumb) | <- From ARMV6K and ARMV6M processors
+----------------+--------------------+ have support for hint instructions
| ARMV6T2 (arm,thumb,thumb2) | (SEV/WFE/WFI/NOP/YIELD). They can
+-------------------------------------+ be either real or default to NOP.
| ARMV7 (arm,thumb,thumb2) | The two processors also use
+-------------------------------------+ different encoding for them.
Patch by Vinicius Tinti.
llvm-svn: 232468
