Fixed invalid mpy instruction being generated
Fixed byte order of 32 bit values when emitted to the elf file
Support for addv/subv to modify 16 bit registers directly
Support for move 8bit immediate
Support for tst0 instruction
Support for directly adding p0 to an ab register after mpy
Support for 8 bit immediate multiply
Support for modr instruction
Support for post increase/decrement for loads and stores
Use copy instruction for a to a register moves
llvm-ar is using CompareStringOrdinal which is available
only starting with Windows Vista (WINVER 0x600).
Fix this by hoising WindowsSupport.h, which sets _WIN32_WINNT
to 0x0601, up to llvm/include/llvm/Support and use it in llvm-ar.
Patch by Cristian Adam!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74599
clang-armv7-linux-build-cache bot is complaining about undefined
references to these variables during linking, so by explicitly
placing them in some TU we should be able to fix that.
Summary:
This reflects its current function better and avoids confusion with clang::DiagnosticConsumer.
The old name/constructor is left around temporarily for compatibility.
(Metagame: merging with out-of-tree changes is harder than usual this month)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73346
There is llvm::Value::MaximumAlignment, which is numerically
equivalent to these constants, but we can't use it directly
because we can't include llvm IR headers in clang Sema.
So instead, copy-paste the constant, and fixup the places to use it.
This was initially reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D72998
Summary:
This patch is part of a patch series to add support for FileCheck
numeric expressions. This specific patch adds support for selecting a
matching format to match a numeric value against (ie. decimal, hex lower
case letters or hex upper case letters).
This commit allows to select what format a numeric value should be
matched against. The following formats are supported: decimal value,
lower case hex value and upper case hex value. Matching formats impact
both the format of numeric value to be matched as well as the format of
accepted numbers in a definition with empty numeric expression
constraint.
Default for absence of format is decimal value unless the numeric
expression constraint is non null and use a variable in which case the
format is the one used to define that variable. Conclict of format in
case of several variable being used is diagnosed and forces the user to
select a matching format explicitely.
This commit also enables immediates in numeric expressions to be in any
radix known to StringRef's GetAsInteger method, except for legacy
numeric expressions (ie [[@LINE+<offset>]] which only support decimal
immediates.
Copyright:
- Linaro (changes up to diff 183612 of revision D55940)
- GraphCore (changes in later versions of revision D55940 and
in new revision created off D55940)
Reviewers: jhenderson, chandlerc, jdenny, probinson, grimar, arichardson
Reviewed By: jhenderson, arichardson
Subscribers: daltenty, MaskRay, hiraditya, llvm-commits, probinson, dblaikie, grimar, arichardson, kristina, hfinkel, rogfer01, JonChesterfield
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60389
Summary:
For `__builtin_assume_aligned()`, we do validate that the alignment
is not greater than `536870912` (D68824), but we don't do that for
`__attribute__((assume_aligned(N)))` attribute.
I suspect we should.
This was initially committed in a4cfb15d15
but reverted in 210f0882c9 due to
suspicious bot failures.
Reviewers: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, hfinkel, rsmith, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72994
Future CPU will include support for prefixed instructions.
These prefixed instructions are formed by a 4 byte prefix
immediately followed by a 4 byte instruction effectively
making an 8 byte instruction. The new instruction paddi
is a prefixed form of addi.
This patch adds paddi and all of the support required
for that instruction. The majority of the patch deals with
supporting the new prefixed instructions. The addition of
paddi is mainly to allow for testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72569
Summary:
Currently 🡺 is used in hover response to represent return types, but it
is not widely available. Changing this back to original to support more clients.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73336
Summary:
This is a follow up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71473#inline-647262.
There's a caveat here that `Align(1)` relies on the compiler understanding of `Log2_64` implementation to produce good code. One could use `Align()` as a replacement but I believe it is less clear that the alignment is one in that case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, courbet, bollu
Subscribers: arsenm, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, Jim, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73099
Summary:
What we're redoing already exists in the X86 backend, it's called
`X86II::getOperandBias`.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mstojanovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73340
Summary:
`alloc_align` attribute takes parameter number, not the alignment itself,
so given **just** the attribute/function declaration we can't do any
sanity checking for said alignment.
However, at call site, given the actual `Expr` that is passed
into that parameter, we //might// be able to evaluate said `Expr`
as Integer Constant Expression, and perform the sanity checks.
But since there is no requirement for that argument to be an immediate,
we may fail, and that's okay.
However if we did evaluate, we should enforce the same constraints
as with `__builtin_assume_aligned()`/`__attribute__((assume_aligned(imm)))`:
said alignment is a power of two, and is not greater than our magic threshold
This was initially committed in c2a9061ac5
but reverted in 00756b1823 because of
suspicious bot failures.
Reviewers: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, hfinkel, rsmith, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72996
We have a test/Object/no-section-header-string-table.test which checks
what happens when an object does not have a section header string table.
It does not check the full output though.
Currently our output is different from GNU readelf, because the latter prints
"<no-strings>" instead of a section name, while we print nothing.
This patch fixes this, adds a proper test case and removes the one from test/Object,
as it is not a right folder for llvm-readelf tests.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73193
Summary:
It simply shows the completed/total items on the background queue, e.g.
indexing: 233/1000
The denominator is reset to zero every time the queue goes idle.
The protocol is fairly complicated here (requires creating a remote "progress"
resource before sending updates). We implement the full protocol, but I've added
an extension allowing it to be skipped to reduce the burden on clients - in
particular the lit test takes this shortcut.
The addition of background index progress to DiagnosticConsumer seems ridiculous
at first glance, but I believe that interface is trending in the direction of
"ClangdServer callbacks" anyway. It's due for a rename, but otherwise actually
fits.
Reviewers: kadircet, usaxena95
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73218
As mentioned on D73023, lowerShuffleWithSHUFPS should be able to commute the shufps inputs to fold the second arg as it will then permute the shufps result anyway.
This was needed when asking a compile unit for its dwo component
triggered a infinite recursion if the dwo unit has not been already
parsed.
This has since been fixed.
The test was printing a char[3] variable without a terminating nul. The
memory after that variable (an unnamed bitfield) was not initialized. If
the memory happened to be nonzero, the summary provider for the variable
would run off into the next field.
This is probably not the right behavior (it should stop at the end of
the array), but this is not the purpose of this test. I have filed
pr44649 for this bug, and fixed the test to not depend on this behavior.
