MachineLICM can hoist an invariant load, but if that load is folded it needs to be unfolded. On AVX512 sometimes this load is an broadcast load which we were previously unable to unfold. This patch adds initial support for that with a very basic list of supported instructions as a starting point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67017
llvm-svn: 370620
The isel patterns for these use a bitcast and load/store, but
DAG combine should have canonicalized those away.
For the purposes of the memory folding table these opcodes can be
replaced by the MOVSSrm_alt/MOVSDrm_alt and MOVSSmr/MOVSDmr opcodes.
llvm-svn: 363644
We don't know if its safe to unfold if we're in 32-bit mode.
This is simlar to what was done to some load opcodes in r363523.
I think its pretty unlikely we will try to unfold these anyway so
I don't think this is testable.
llvm-svn: 363595
It would not be safe to unfold the memory form the register form
without checking that we are compiling for 64-bit mode.
This probaby isn't a real functional issue since we are unlikely
to unfold any of these instructions since they don't have any
tied registers, aren't commutable, and don't have any inputs
other than the address.
llvm-svn: 363523
Reverts "[X86] Remove (V)MOV64toSDrr/m and (V)MOVDI2SSrr/m. Use 128-bit result MOVD/MOVQ and COPY_TO_REGCLASS instead"
Reverts "[TargetLowering][AMDGPU][X86] Improve SimplifyDemandedBits bitcast handling"
Eric Christopher and Jorge Gorbe Moya reported some issues with these patches to me off list.
Removing the CodeGenOnly instructions has changed how fneg is handled during fast-isel with sse/sse2. We're now emitting fsub -0.0, x instead
moving to the integer domain(in a GPR), xoring the sign bit, and then moving back to xmm. This is because the fast isel table no longer
contains an entry for (f32/f64 bitcast (i32/i64)) so the target independent fneg code fails. The use of fsub changes the behavior of nan with
respect to -O2 codegen which will always use a pxor. NOTE: We still have a difference with double with -m32 since the move to GPR doesn't work
there. I'll file a separate PR for that and add test cases.
Since removing the CodeGenOnly instructions was fixing PR41619, I'm reverting r358887 which exposed that PR. Though I wouldn't be surprised
if that bug can still be hit independent of that.
This should hopefully get Google back to green. I'll work with Simon and other X86 folks to figure out how to move forward again.
llvm-svn: 360066
Summary:
The register form of these instructions are CodeGenOnly instructions that cover
GR32->FR32 and GR64->FR64 bitcasts. There is a similar set of instructions for
the opposite bitcast. Due to the patterns using bitcasts these instructions get
marked as "bitcast" machine instructions as well. The peephole pass is able to
look through these as well as other copies to try to avoid register bank copies.
Because FR32/FR64/VR128 are all coalescable to each other we can end up in a
situation where a GR32->FR32->VR128->FR64->GR64 sequence can be reduced to
GR32->GR64 which the copyPhysReg code can't handle.
To prevent this, this patch removes one set of the 'bitcast' instructions. So
now we can only go GR32->VR128->FR32 or GR64->VR128->FR64. The instruction that
converts from GR32/GR64->VR128 has no special significance to the peephole pass
and won't be looked through.
I guess the other option would be to add support to copyPhysReg to just promote
the GR32->GR64 to a GR64->GR64 copy. The upper bits were basically undefined
anyway. But removing the CodeGenOnly instruction in favor of one that won't be
optimized seemed safer.
I deleted the peephole test because it couldn't be made to work with the bitcast
instructions removed.
The load version of the instructions were unnecessary as the pattern that selects
them contains a bitcasted load which should never happen.
Fixes PR41619.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61223
llvm-svn: 359392
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between SETcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60138
llvm-svn: 357801
Summary:
Reorder the condition code enum to match their encodings. Move it to MC layer so it can be used by the scheduler models.
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes
translation switches for converting between CMOV instructions and condition
codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate.
We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the
asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked
IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
This does complicate the scheduler models a little since we can't assign the
A and BE instructions to a separate class now.
I plan to make similar changes for SETcc and Jcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, hiraditya, kristina, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60041
llvm-svn: 357800
These are used to help convert OR->LEA when needed to avoid avoid a copy. They
aren't need after register allocation.
Happens to remove an ugly goto from X86MCCodeEmitter.cpp
llvm-svn: 356356
We already support 8-bits adds in convertToThreeAddress. But we can also support 8-bit OR if the bits are disjoint. We already do this for 16/32/64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58863
llvm-svn: 355423
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Enabling this fully exposes a latent bug in the instruction folding: we
never update the register constraints for the register operands when
fusing a load into another operation. The fused form could, in theory,
have different register constraints on its operands. And in fact,
TCRETURNm* needs its memory operands to use tailcall compatible
registers.
I've updated the folding code to re-constrain all the registers after
they are mapped onto their new instruction.
However, we still can't enable folding in the general case from
TCRETURNr* to TCRETURNm* because doing so may require more registers to
be available during the tail call. If the call itself uses all but one
register, and the folded load would require both a base and index
register, there will not be enough registers to allocate the tail call.
It would be better, IMO, to teach the register allocator to *unfold*
TCRETURNm* when it runs out of registers (or specifically check the
number of registers available during the TCRETURNr*) but I'm not going
to try and solve that for now. Instead, I've just blocked the forward
folding from r -> m, leaving LLVM free to unfold from m -> r as that
doesn't introduce new register pressure constraints.
The down side is that I don't have anything that will directly exercise
this. Instead, I will be immediately using this it my SLH patch. =/
Still worse, without allowing the TCRETURNr* -> TCRETURNm* fold, I don't
have any tests that demonstrate the failure to update the memory operand
register constraints. This patch still seems correct, but I'm nervous
about the degree of testing due to this.
Suggestions?
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49717
llvm-svn: 337845
Also move the static folding tables, their search functions and the new class into new cpp/h files.
The unfolding table is effectively static data. It's just a different ordering and a subset of the static folding tables.
By putting it in a separate ManagedStatic we ensure we only have one copy instead of one per X86InstrInfo object. This way also makes it only get initialized when really needed.
llvm-svn: 336056
