Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphael Isemann
808142876c [lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2020-01-24 08:52:55 +01:00
Lawrence D'Anna
62c9fe4273 uint32_t options -> File::OpenOptions options
Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.

It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected

split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853

llvm-svn: 374817
2019-10-14 20:15:34 +00:00
Pavel Labath
aa51e6a683 Refactor user/group name resolving code
Summary:
This creates an abstract base class called "UserIDResolver", which can
be implemented to provide user/group ID resolution capabilities for
various objects. Posix host implement a PosixUserIDResolver, which does
that using posix apis (getpwuid and friends).  PlatformGDBRemote
forwards queries over the gdb-remote link, etc. ProcessInstanceInfo
class is refactored to make use of this interface instead of taking a
platform pointer as an argument. The base resolver class already
implements caching and thread-safety, so implementations don't have to
worry about that.

The main motivating factor for this was to remove external dependencies
from the ProcessInstanceInfo class (so it can be put next to
ProcessLaunchInfo and friends), but it has other benefits too:
- ability to test the user name caching code
- ability to test ProcessInstanceInfo dumping code
- consistent interface for user/group resolution between Platform and
  Host classes.

Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham

Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58167

llvm-svn: 355323
2019-03-04 18:48:00 +00:00
Aaron Smith
d504fe20e3 [lldb-server] Add remote platform capabilities for Windows
Summary:
Implement a few routines for Windows to support some basic process interaction and file system operations.


Reviewers: zturner, llvm-commits, labath, jingham

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: emaste, jdoerfert, Hui, labath, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56232

llvm-svn: 354010
2019-02-14 05:34:46 +00:00
Pavel Labath
52d9c62a50 Extract common PlatformPOSIX/Windows code into a separate class
Summary:
The two classes contained a lot of duplicated code, but there wasn't a
good place to factor it to. It couldn't be the base Platform class,
since we also have platforms which are only remote (such as
PlatformGDBRemoteServer), and so it did not make sense for those to have
an m_remote_platform member.

This patch creates a new class, RemoteAwarePlatform, which can serve as
a base class for platforms which can both serve as a host, and forward
actions to a remote system. It is motivated partly by D56232 (which was
about to add a bunch of additional duplicated methods), and partly by my
own need to modify a function which happens to be implemented in both
places identically.

The patch moves the methods which are trivially identical in the two
classes into the common base class, there were one or two more methods
which could probably be merged into one, but this wasn't completely
trivial, so I did not attempt to do that now.

Reviewers: jingham, zturner, clayborg, asmith

Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, Hui, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58052

llvm-svn: 353812
2019-02-12 09:27:24 +00:00