Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
Currently, lit tests don't set neither the module cache for building
inferiors nor the module cache used by lldb when running tests.
Furthermore, we have several places where we rely on the path to the
module cache being always the same, rather than passing the correct
value around. This makes it hard to specify a different module cache
path when debugging a a test.
This patch reworks how we determine and pass around the module cache
paths and fixes the omission on the lit side. It also adds a sanity
check to the lit and dotest suites.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66966
llvm-svn: 370394
