Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
If a core file has an EFI version string which includes a UUID
(similar to what it returns for the kdp KDP_KERNELVERSION packet)
in the LC_IDENT or LC_NOTE 'kern ver str' load command. In that
case, we should try to find the binary and dSYM for the UUID
listed. The dSYM may have python code which knows how to relocate
the binary to the correct address in lldb's target section load
list and loads other ancillary binaries.
The test case is a little involved,
1. it compiles an inferior hello world apple (a.out),
2. it compiles a program which can create a corefile manually
with a specific binary's UUID encoded in it,
3. it gets the UUID of the a.out binary,
4. it creates a shell script, dsym-for-uuid.sh, which will
return the full path to the a.out + a.out.dSYM when called
with teh correct UUID,
5. it sets the LLDB_APPLE_DSYMFORUUID_EXECUTABLE env var before
creating the lldb target, to point to this dsym-for-uuid.sh,
6. runs the create-corefile binary we compiled in step #2,
7. loads the corefile from step #6 into lldb,
8. verifies that lldb loaded a.out by reading the LC_NOTE
load command from the corefile, calling dsym-for-uuid.sh with
that UUID, got back the path to a.out and loaded it.
whew!
<rdar://problem/47562911>
llvm-svn: 366378
