Summary:
So far we rely on the default argument and the fact that we don't call this
inline function in our actual `main.cpp` to make sure that this function can only
be called if LLDB loads this header as a C++ module. This patch just adds
the nodebug attribute as yet another measure to make sure LLDB can't call this
function without the standard module loaded. Note that the test is already
requiring clang for the sysroot setup, so its fine that this is a Clang specific attribute.
Reviewers: friss, labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68861
We essentially test libc++ in a sysroot here so let's make sure
that we actually only run this test on platforms where libc++
testing is enabled.
llvm-svn: 374572
We currently don't handle the error in the Expected we get
when searching for an equal local DeclContext. Usually this can't
happen as this would require that we have a STL container and
we can find libc++'s std module, but when we load the module in
the expression parser the module doesn't even contain the 'std'
namespace. The only way I see to test this is by having a fake
'std' module that requires a special define to actually provide
its contents, while it will just be empty (that is, it doesn't
even contain the 'std' namespace) without that define. LLDB currently
doesn't know about that define in the expression parser, so it
will load the wrong 'empty' module which should trigger this error.
Also removed the 'auto' for that variable as the function name
doesn't make it obvious that this is an expected and not just
a optional/ptr (which is how this slipped in from the start).
llvm-svn: 374525
This test was previously passing because myabs was actually emitted into the
debug information and we called that. The test itself was broken as it didn't
use the libc++ directory structure (the /v1/ directory was just called /include/).
This patch gives myabs a default argument which we can't get from debug information
and inlines the function to make sure we can't call it from LLDB without loading
the C++ module.
llvm-svn: 374335
That flag was introduced in Clang 6.0, so this made the test fail
with Clang <= 5.0. As it only influences linking builtin libraries
like -m which aren't relevant for this test, we can drop this flag.
llvm-svn: 372827
This test streamlines our use of variables that are expected by
Makefile.rules throughout the test suite. Mostly it replaced
potentially dangerous overrides and updates of variables like CFLAGS
with safe assignments to variables reserved for this purpose like
CFLAGS_EXTRAS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67984
llvm-svn: 372795
Summary:
At the moment, when trying to import the `std` module in LLDB, we look at the imported modules used in the compiled program
and try to infer the Clang configuration we need from the DWARF module-import. That was the initial idea but turned out to
cause a few problems or inconveniences:
* It requires that users compile their programs with C++ modules. Given how experimental C++ modules are makes this feature inaccessible
for many users. Also it means that people can't just get the benefits of this feature for free when we activate it by default
(and we can't just close all the associated bug reports).
* Relying on DWARF's imported module tags (that are only emitted by default on macOS) means this can only be used when using DWARF (and with -glldb on Linux).
* We essentially hardcoded the C standard library paths on some platforms (Linux) or just couldn't support this feature on other platforms (macOS).
This patch drops the whole idea of looking at the imported module DWARF tags and instead just uses the support files of the compilation unit.
If we look at the support files and see file paths that indicate where the C standard library and libc++ are, we can just create the module
configuration this information. This fixes all the problems above which means we can enable all the tests now on Linux, macOS and with other debug information
than what we currently had. The only debug information specific code is now the iteration over external type module when -gmodules is used (as `std` and also the
`Darwin` module are their own external type module with their own files).
The meat of this patch is the CppModuleConfiguration which looks at the file paths from the compilation unit and then figures out the include paths
based on those paths. It's quite conservative in that it only enables modules if we find a single C library and single libc++ library. It's still missing some
test mode where we try to compile an expression before we actually activate the config for the user (which probably also needs some caching mechanism),
but for now it works and makes the feature usable.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: mgorny, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67760
llvm-svn: 372716
Summary:
Instead of each test case knowing its depth relative to the test root,
we can just have dotest add the folder containing Makefile.rules to the
include path.
This was motivated by r370616, though I have been wanting to do this
ever since we moved to building tests out-of-tree.
The only manually modified files in this patch are lldbinline.py and
plugins/builder_base.py. The rest of the patch has been produced by this
shell command:
find . \( -name Makefile -o -name '*.mk' \) -exec sed --in-place -e '/LEVEL *:\?=/d' -e '1,2{/^$/d}' -e 's,\$(LEVEL)/,,' {} +
Reviewers: teemperor, aprantl, espindola, jfb
Subscribers: emaste, javed.absar, arichardson, christof, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67083
llvm-svn: 370845
Summary:
As discussed on lldb-dev, this patch moves some LLDB tests into a hierarchy that more closely
resembles the commands we use in the LLDB interpreter. This patch should only move tests
that use the command interpreter and shouldn't touch any tests that primarily test the SB API.
Reviewers: #lldb, jfb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67033
llvm-svn: 370605