Summary:
CXXRecordDecls that have a move constructor but no copy constructor need to
have their implicit copy constructor marked as deleted (see C++11 [class.copy]p7, p18)
Currently we don't do that when building an AST with ClangASTContext which causes
Sema to realise that the AST is malformed and asserting when trying to create an implicit
copy constructor for us in the expression:
```
Assertion failed: ((data().DefaultedCopyConstructorIsDeleted || needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor())
&& "Copy constructor should not be deleted"), function setImplicitCopyConstructorIsDeleted, file include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h, line 828.
```
In the test case there is a class `NoCopyCstr` that should have its copy constructor marked as
deleted (as it has a move constructor). When we end up trying to tab complete in the
`IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr` constructor, Sema realises that the `IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr`
has no implicit copy constructor and tries to create one for us. It then realises that
`NoCopyCstr` also has no copy constructor it could find via lookup. However because we
haven't marked the FieldDecl as having a deleted copy constructor the
`needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor()` returns false and the assert fails.
`needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor()` would return true if during the time we
added the `NoCopyCstr` FieldDecl to `IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr` we would have actually marked
it as having a deleted copy constructor (which would then mark the copy constructor of
`IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr ` as needing overload resolution and Sema is happy).
This patch sets the correct mark when we complete our CXXRecordDecls (which is the time when
we know whether a copy constructor has been declared). In theory we don't have to do this if
we had a Sema around when building our debug info AST but at the moment we don't have this
so this has to do the job for now.
Reviewers: shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72694
Summary:
This patch adds a new function to lldbtest: `expect_expr`. This function is supposed to replace the current approach
of calling `expect`/`runCmd` with `expr`, `p` etc.
`expect_expr` allows evaluating expressions and matching their value/summary/type/error message without
having to do any string matching that might allow unintended passes (e.g., `self.expect("expr 3+4", substrs=["7"])`
can unexpectedly pass for results like `(Class7) $0 = 7`, `(int) $7 = 22`, `(int) $0 = 77` and so on).
This only uses the function in a few places to test and demonstrate it. I'll migrate the tests in follow up commits.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, shafik, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70314
When trying to interpret an expression with a function call, if the
process hasn't been launched, the expression fails to be interpreted
and the user gets the following error message:
```error: Can't run the expression locally```
This message doesn't explain why the expression failed to be
interpreted, that's why this patch improves the error message that is
displayed when trying to run an expression while no process is running.
rdar://11991708
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72510
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
This just adds `NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE` to tests that don't really exercise anything debug information specific
and therefore don't need to be rerun for all debug information variants.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, aprantl, mib, jfb
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: dexonsmith, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72447
Looking at a sometimes-passing test case on a platform
where random values were being returned - sometimes
the expected digit ('1' or '2') would be included in the
random returned value. Add a prefix to reduce the likelihood of
this a bit.
Summary:
We currently don't set access specifiers for function template declarations. This seems to be fine
as long as the function template is not declared inside any record in which case Clang asserts
with the following once we try to query it's access:
```
Assertion failed: (Access != AS_none && "Access specifier is AS_none inside a record decl"), function AccessDeclContextSanity,
```
This patch just marks these function template declarations as public to make Clang happy.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71909
This fix was motivated by a crashes in expression parsing during code generation in which we had a RecordDecl that had incomplete FieldDecl. During code generation when computing the layout for the RecordDecl we crash because we have several incomplete FieldDecl.
This fixes the issue by assuring that during ImportDefinition(...) for a RecordDecl we also import the definitions for each FieldDecl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71378
If you don't do this you end up running arbitrary code with
only one thread allowed to run, which can cause deadlocks.
<rdar://problem/56422478>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71440
Summary:
A lot of our tests copied the setUp code from our TestSampleTest.py:
```
def setUp(self):
# Call super's setUp().
TestBase.setUp(self)
```
This code does nothing unless we actually do any setUp work in there, so let's remove all these method definitions.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71454
Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
Summary:
This was causing problems on linux, where we'd end up calling the
deleting destructor instead of a regular one (because they have the same
demangled name), making a lot of mischief in the process.
The only place where this was necessary (according to the test suite, at
least) was to call a base structor instead of a complete one, but this
is now handled in a more targeted fashion.
TestCallOverriddenMethod is now re-enabled as it now passes reliably.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70722
I have either opened new bug reports for these tests, or added links to
existing bugs.
This should help make the lldb-aarch64-ubuntu buildbot green (there will
still be some unexpected passes that someone should look into, but those
can be handled later).
Summary:
To run the testsuite remotely the executable needs to be uploaded to
the target system. The Target takes care of this by default.
When the test uses additional shared libraries, those won't be handled
by default and need to be registered with the target using
test.registerSharedLibrariesWithTarget(target, dylib).
Calling this API requires a target, so it doesn't mesh well with the
run_to_* helpers that we've been advertising as the right way to write
tests.
This patch adds an extra_images argument to all the helpers and does
the registration automatically when running a remote
testsuite. TestWeakSymbols.py was converted to use this new scheme.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70134
TestFormatters.py has a sequence of three 'next' commands to get past
all the initializations in the test function. On AArch64 (and
potentially other platforms), this was one 'next' too many and we ended
up outside our frame.
This patch replaces the sequence with a 'thread until ' the line of the
return from the function, so we should stop after all the
initializations but before actually returning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70303
The function call and the constructor call fail now several Linux
bots (Swift CI, my own bot and Stella's Debian system), so let's disable
the relevant test parts until we can figure out why it is failing.
Summary:
So far we rely on the default argument and the fact that we don't call this
inline function in our actual `main.cpp` to make sure that this function can only
be called if LLDB loads this header as a C++ module. This patch just adds
the nodebug attribute as yet another measure to make sure LLDB can't call this
function without the standard module loaded. Note that the test is already
requiring clang for the sysroot setup, so its fine that this is a Clang specific attribute.
Reviewers: friss, labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68861
Summary:
This patch converts another user of ArgInfo::count over to
use ArgInfo::max_positional_args instead. I also add a test
to make sure both documented signatures for python type formatters
work.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69153
llvm-svn: 375334
We call these tests in the second test function where they are
x-failed on Windows. I forgot to remove the tests from the first
test function (which is not x-failed on Windows) when extracting these
calls into their own test function, so the test is still failing on Windows.
llvm-svn: 375271
These tests were testing a bug related to constructors. It seems that
on Windows the expression command can't construct objects (or at least,
call their constructor explicitly which is required for the tests), so
this is just x-failing them until Windows actually supports constructor calls.
llvm-svn: 375173
Summary:
When we have a artificial constructor DIE, we currently create from that a global function with the name of that class.
That ends up causing a bunch of funny errors such as "must use 'struct' tag to refer to type 'Foo' in this scope" when
doing `Foo f`. Also causes that constructing a class via `Foo()` actually just calls that global function.
The fix is that when we have an artificial method decl, we always treat it as handled even if we don't create a CXXMethodDecl
for it (which we never do for artificial methods at the moment).
Fixes rdar://55757491 and probably some other radars.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jingham, shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130
llvm-svn: 375151
We essentially test libc++ in a sysroot here so let's make sure
that we actually only run this test on platforms where libc++
testing is enabled.
llvm-svn: 374572
We currently don't handle the error in the Expected we get
when searching for an equal local DeclContext. Usually this can't
happen as this would require that we have a STL container and
we can find libc++'s std module, but when we load the module in
the expression parser the module doesn't even contain the 'std'
namespace. The only way I see to test this is by having a fake
'std' module that requires a special define to actually provide
its contents, while it will just be empty (that is, it doesn't
even contain the 'std' namespace) without that define. LLDB currently
doesn't know about that define in the expression parser, so it
will load the wrong 'empty' module which should trigger this error.
Also removed the 'auto' for that variable as the function name
doesn't make it obvious that this is an expected and not just
a optional/ptr (which is how this slipped in from the start).
llvm-svn: 374525
This test was previously passing because myabs was actually emitted into the
debug information and we called that. The test itself was broken as it didn't
use the libc++ directory structure (the /v1/ directory was just called /include/).
This patch gives myabs a default argument which we can't get from debug information
and inlines the function to make sure we can't call it from LLDB without loading
the C++ module.
llvm-svn: 374335
Most of the secondary Makefiles we have are just a couple variable
definitions and then an include of Makefile.rules. This patch removes
most of the secondary Makefiles and replaces them with a direct
invocation of Makefile.rules in the main Makefile. The specificities
of each sub-build are listed right there on the recursive $(MAKE)
call. All the variables that matter are being passed automagically by
make as they have been passed on the command line. The only things you
need to specify are the variables customizating the Makefile.rules
logic for each image.
This patch also removes most of the clean logic from those Makefiles
and from Makefile.rules. The clean rule is not required anymore now
that we run the testsuite in a separate build directory that is wiped
with each run. The patch leaves a very crude version of clean in
Makefile.rules which removes everything inside of $(BUILDDIR). It does
this only when the $(BUILDDIR) looks like a sub-directory of our
standard testsuite build directory to be extra safe.
Reviewers: aprantl, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68558
llvm-svn: 374076
That flag was introduced in Clang 6.0, so this made the test fail
with Clang <= 5.0. As it only influences linking builtin libraries
like -m which aren't relevant for this test, we can drop this flag.
llvm-svn: 372827
