Previously, we just canonicalized the type, but this lead to crashes with
parameter types that referred to ParmVarDecls of the constructor. There may be
more cases that this TreeTransform needs to handle though, such as a constructor
parameter type referring to a member in an unevaluated context. Canonicalization
doesn't address these cases either though, so we can address them as-needed in
follow-up commits.
rdar://41330135
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49439
llvm-svn: 338165
Previously, clang marked the specialization as invalid without emitting a
diagnostic. This lead to an assert in CodeGen.
rdar://41806724
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49085
llvm-svn: 337497
provided by an outer template.
We made the incorrect assumption in various places that the only way we
can have any arguments already provided for a pack during template
argument deduction was from a partially-specified pack. That's not true;
we can also have arguments from an enclosing already-instantiated
template, and that can even result in the function template's own pack
parameters having a fixed length and not being packs for the purposes of
template argument deduction.
llvm-svn: 337481
As listed in the above PRs, vector_size doesn't allow
dependent types/values. This patch introduces a new
DependentVectorType to handle a VectorType that has a dependent
size or type.
In the future, ALL the vector-types should be able to create one
of these to handle dependent types/sizes as well. For example,
DependentSizedExtVectorType could likely be switched to just use
this instead, though that is left as an exercise for the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49045
llvm-svn: 337036
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.
Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.
llvm-svn: 336945
The member init list for the sole constructor for CodeGenFunction
has gotten out of hand, so this patch moves the non-parameter-dependent
initializations into the member value inits.
llvm-svn: 336726
We track when we see a name-shaped expression followed by a '<' token
and parse the '<' as a comparison. Then:
* if we see a token sequence that cannot possibly be an expression but
can be a template argument (in particular, a type-id) that follows
either a ',' or the '<', diagnose that the '<' was supposed to start
a template argument list, and
* if we see '>()', diagnose that the '<' was supposed to start a
template argument list.
This only changes the diagnostic for error cases, and in practice
appears to catch the most common cases where a missing 'template'
keyword leads to parse errors within a template.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48571
llvm-svn: 335687
Clang used to pass the base lvalue of a non-type template parameter
to the template instantiation phase when the base part is __uuidof
and it's running in C++17 mode.
However, that drops its LValuePath, and unintentionally transforms
&__uuidof(...) to __uuidof(...).
This CL fixes that by passing whole expr. Fixes PR24986.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46820?id=146557
Patch from Taiju Tsuiki <tzik@chromium.org>!
llvm-svn: 332614
After a fatal error Sema::InstantiatingTemplate doesn't allow further
instantiation and doesn't push a CodeSynthesisContext. When we tried to
synthesize implicit deduction guides from constructors we hit the
assertion
> Assertion failed: (!CodeSynthesisContexts.empty() && "Cannot perform an instantiation without some context on the " "instantiation stack"), function SubstType, file clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp, line 1580.
Fix by avoiding deduction guide synthesis if InstantiatingTemplate is invalid.
rdar://problem/39051732
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46446
llvm-svn: 332307
If the name after 'template' is an unresolved using declaration (not containing
'typename'), then we don't yet know if it's a valid template-name, so don't
reject it prior to instantiation. Instead, treat it as naming a dependent
member of the current instantiation.
llvm-svn: 332291
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
I found that explicit template parameters that caused a
narrowing integer conversion resulted in the incorrect parameter
being mentioned in the note (see test attached). This is because
the argument checking code doesn't check to see if it caused
SFINAE errors when checking the arguments, so instead of giving
up on the first error, it continues through the list. This
makes the error reporting pick up the last template param every time.
This patch checks these parameters on each argument and gives up
if there is an error. The result is that only the required amount
of arguments are checked, and that the 'Converted' array contains
only the successful arguments before the first failure, as the
calls seem to all expect.
llvm-svn: 331651
This is not yet part of any C++ working draft, and so is controlled by the flag
-fchar8_t rather than a -std= flag. (The GCC implementation is controlled by a
flag with the same name.)
This implementation is experimental, and will be removed or revised
substantially to match the proposal as it makes its way through the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 331244
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
a preceding 'template' keyword.
We only diagnose in the dependent case (wherein we used to crash). Another bug
prevents the diagnostic from appearing in the non-template case.
llvm-svn: 330894
This patch is a tweak of changyu's patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40381. It differs in that the recognition of the 'concept' token is moved into the machinery that recognizes declaration-specifiers - this allows us to leverage the attribute handling machinery more seamlessly.
See the test file to get a sense of the basic parsing that this patch supports.
There is much more work to be done before concepts are usable...
Thanks Changyu!
llvm-svn: 330794
Summary:
Clean carriage returns from lib/ and include/. NFC.
(I have to make this change locally in order for `git diff` to show sane output after I edit a file, so I might as well ask for it to be committed. I don't have commit privs myself.)
(Without this patch, `git rebase`ing any change involving SemaDeclCXX.cpp is a real nightmare. :( So while I have no right to ask for this to be committed, geez would it make my workflow easier if it were.)
Here's the command I used to reformat things. (Requires bash and OSX/FreeBSD sed.)
git grep -l $'\r' lib include | xargs sed -i -e $'s/\r//'
find lib include -name '*-e' -delete
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45591
Patch by Arthur O'Dwyer.
llvm-svn: 330112
The current support of the feature produces only 2 lines in report:
-Some general Code Generation Time;
-Total time of Backend Consumer actions.
This patch extends Clang time report with new lines related to Preprocessor, Include Filea Search, Parsing, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578
llvm-svn: 329684
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
More generally, this permits a template to be specialized in any scope in which
it could be defined, so this also supersedes DR44 and DR374 (the latter of
which we previously only implemented in C++11 mode onwards due to unclarity as
to whether it was a DR).
llvm-svn: 327705
template parameter that is an expanded parameter pack, only substitute into the
current slice, not the entire pack.
This reduces the checking of N template template arguments for an expanded
parameter pack containing N parameters from quadratic time to linear time in
the length of the pack. This is important because one (and possibly the only?)
general technique for splitting a template parameter pack in linear time
depends on doing this.
llvm-svn: 326973
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
This patch addresses a FIXME and has the template-parameter processing functions return a more derived common type NamedDecl (as opposed to a type needlessly higher up in the inheritance hierarchy : Decl).
llvm-svn: 321409
The standard correctly forbids various decl-specifiers that dont make sense on non-type template parameters - such as the extern in:
template<extern int> struct X;
This patch implements those restrictions (in a fashion similar to the corresponding checks on function parameters within ActOnParamDeclarator).
Credit goes to miyuki (Mikhail Maltsev) for drawing attention to this issue, authoring the initial versions of this patch, and supporting the effort to re-engineer it slightly. Thank you!
For details of how this patch evolved please see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40705
llvm-svn: 321339
Summary:
This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test
cases are disabled.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson
Reviewed By: saar.raz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380
Patch by Changyu Li!
llvm-svn: 319992
This matches MSVC's behaviour, and we already do it for class templates
since r270897.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40621
llvm-svn: 319386
This bug was found via self-build on lld, and worked around
here: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL316180
The issue is that the 'using' causes the lookup to pick up the
first decl. However, when setting inherited default parameters,
we only update 'forward', not 'backward'. SO, only the newest param
list has all the information about the default arguments.
This patch ensures that the list of parameters we look through checks
the newest decl's template parameter list so it doesn't miss a default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39127
llvm-svn: 316405
In order to identify the copy deduction candidate, I considered two approaches:
- attempt to determine whether an implicit guide is a copy deduction candidate by checking certain properties of its subsituted parameter during overload-resolution.
- using one of the many bits (WillHaveBody) from FunctionDecl (that CXXDeductionGuideDecl inherits from) that are otherwise irrelevant for deduction guides
After some brittle gymnastics w the first strategy, I settled on the second, although to avoid confusion and to give that bit a better name, i turned it into a member of an anonymous union.
Given this identification 'bit', the tweak to overload resolution was a simple reordering of the deduction guide checks (in SemaOverload.cpp::isBetterOverloadCandidate), in-line with Jason Merrill's p0620r0 drafting which made it into the working paper. Concordant with that, I made sure the copy deduction candidate is always added.
References:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34970
See http://wg21.link/p0620r0
llvm-svn: 316292
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.
llvm-svn: 315379
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
This patch relates to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666 This adds support
for template parameters to be passed to the address_space attribute.
The main goal is to add further flexibility to the attribute and allow
for it to be used easily with templates.
The main additions are a new type (DependentAddressSpaceType) alongside
its TypeLoc and its mangling. As well as the logic required to support
dependent address spaces which mainly resides in TreeTransform.h and
SemaType.cpp.
llvm-svn: 314649
When a static_assert fails, dig out a specific condition to diagnose,
using the same logic that we use to find the enable_if condition to
diagnose.
llvm-svn: 313315
Summary:
r306137 made dllimport pointers to member functions non-constant. This
is correct because a load must be executed to resolve any dllimported
data. However, r306137 did not account for the use of dllimport member
function pointers used as template arguments.
This change re-lands r306137 with a template instantiation fix.
This fixes PR33570.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34714
llvm-svn: 307446
When enable_if disables a particular overload resolution candidate,
rummage through the enable_if condition to find the specific condition
that caused the failure. For example, if we have something like:
template<
typename Iter,
typename = std::enable_if_t<Random_access_iterator<Iter> &&
Comparable<Iterator_value_type<Iter>>>>
void mysort(Iter first, Iter last) {}
and we call "mysort" with "std::list<int>" iterators, we'll get a
diagnostic saying that the "Random_access_iterator<Iter>" requirement
failed. If we call "mysort" with
"std::vector<something_not_comparable>", we'll get a diagnostic saying
that the "Comparable<...>" requirement failed.
llvm-svn: 307196
definition or non-reference class type.
The crash occurs when there is a template parameter list in a class that
is missing the closing angle bracket followed by a definition of a
struct. For example:
class C0 {
public:
template<typename T, typename T1 = T // missing closing angle bracket
struct S0 {};
C0() : m(new S0<int>) {}
S0<int> *m;
};
This happens because the parsed struct is added to the scope of the
enclosing class without having its access specifier set, which results
in an assertion failure in SemaAccess.cpp later.
This commit fixes the crash by adding the parsed struct to the enclosing
file scope and marking structs as invalid if they are defined in
template parameter lists.
rdar://problem/31783961
rdar://problem/19570630
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33606
llvm-svn: 306317
inferring based on the current module at the point of creation.
This should result in no functional change except when building a preprocessed
module (or more generally when using #pragma clang module begin/end to switch
module in the middle of a file), in which case it allows us to correctly track
the owning module for declarations. We can't map from FileID to module in the
preprocessed module case, since all modules would have the same FileID.
There are still a couple of remaining places that try to infer a module from a
source location; I'll clean those up in follow-up changes.
llvm-svn: 303322
When we parse a redefinition of an entity for which we have a hidden existing
declaration, make it visible in the current module instead of mapping the
current source location to its containing module.
llvm-svn: 302842
When an undeclared identifier in a context that requires a type is followed by
'<', only look for type templates when typo-correcting, tweak the diagnostic
text to say that a template name (not a type name) was undeclared, and parse
the template arguments when recovering from the error.
llvm-svn: 302732
The heuristic that we use here is:
* the left-hand side must be a simple identifier or a class member access
* the right-hand side must be '<' followed by either a '>' or by a type-id that
cannot be an expression (in particular, not followed by '(' or '{')
* there is a '>' token matching the '<' token
The second condition guarantees the expression would otherwise be ill-formed.
If we're confident that the user intended the name before the '<' to be
interpreted as a template, diagnose the fact that we didn't interpret it
that way, rather than diagnosing that the template arguments are not valid
expressions.
llvm-svn: 302615
This improves our behavior in a few ways:
* We now guarantee that if a member is marked as being a member
specialization, there will actually be a member specialization declaration
somewhere on its redeclaration chain. This fixes a crash in modules builds
where we would try to check that there was a visible declaration of the
member specialization and be surprised to not find any declaration of it at
all.
* We don't set the source location of the in-class declaration of the member
specialization to the out-of-line declaration's location until we have
actually finished merging them. This fixes some very silly looking
diagnostics, where we'd point a "previous declaration is here" note at the
same declaration we're complaining about. Ideally we wouldn't mess with the
prior declaration's location at all, but too much code assumes that the
first declaration of an entity is a reasonable thing to use as an indication
of where it was declared, and that's not really true for a member
specialization unless we fake it like this.
llvm-svn: 302596
This reverts an attempt to check that types match when matching a
dependently-typed non-type template parameter. (This comes up when matching the
parameters of a template template parameter against the parameters of a
template template argument.)
The matching rules here are murky at best. Our behavior after this revert is
definitely wrong for certain C++17 features (for 'auto' template parameter
types within the parameter list of a template template argument in particular),
but our behavior before this revert is wrong for some pre-existing testcases,
so reverting to our prior behavior seems like our best option.
llvm-svn: 300262
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
A 'decltype(auto)' parameter can match any other kind of non-type template
parameter, so should be usable in place of any other parameter in a template
template argument. The standard is sadly extremely unclear on how this is
supposed to work, but this seems like the obviously-correct result.
It's less clear whether an 'auto' parameter should be able to match
'decltype(auto)', since the former cannot be used if the latter turns out to be
used for a reference type, but if we disallow that then consistency suggests we
should also disallow 'auto' matching 'T' for the same reason, defeating
intended use cases of the feature.
llvm-svn: 295866
template deduction guides for class template argument deduction.
Ensure that we have a local instantiation scope for tracking the instantiated
parameters. Additionally, unusually, we're substituting at depth 1 and leaving
depth 0 alone; make sure that we don't reduce template parameter depth by 2 for
inner parameters in the process. (This is probably also broken for alias
templates in the case where they're expanded within a dependent context, but
this patch doesn't fix that.)
llvm-svn: 295696
instantiation.
In preparation for converting the template stack to a more general context
stack (so we can include context notes for other kinds of context).
llvm-svn: 295686
guide from a constructor.
The purpose of this change is to avoid triggering instantiation of the class
when substituting back into the deduction guide if it uses a typedef member.
We will still instantiate the class if the constructor (explicitly or
implicitly, directly or indirectly) uses the current instantiation in a way
that we can't canonicalize out, but that seems unavoidable.
llvm-svn: 295016
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
Summary:
This adds associated constraints as a property of class templates.
An error is produced if redeclarations are not similarly constrained.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, nwilson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25674
llvm-svn: 294697
name. If the dependent name happened to end in a template-id (X<T>::Y<U>), we
would fail to notice that the 'typename' keyword is missing when resolving it
to a type.
It turns out that GCC has a similar bug. If this shows up in much real code, we
can easily downgrade this to an ExtWarn.
llvm-svn: 293815
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
This rule permits the injected-class-name of a class template to be used as
both a template type argument and a template template argument, with no extra
syntax required to disambiguate.
llvm-svn: 292426
The rules around typechecking deduced template arguments during partial
ordering are not clear, and while the prior behavior does not seem to be
correct (it doesn't follow the general model of partial ordering where each
template parameter is replaced by a non-dependent but unique value), the new
behavior is also not clearly right and breaks some existing idioms.
The new behavior is retained for dealing with non-type template parameters
with 'auto' types, as without it even the most basic uses of that feature
don't work. We can revisit this once CWG has come to an agreement on how
partial ordering with 'auto' non-type template parameters is supposed to
work.
llvm-svn: 292183
In the case where the template class itself is already `dllexport`, the
implicit instantiation will have already emitted all members. When we
check the explicit instantiation definition, the `Specialization` will
have inherited the `dllexport` attribute, so we'll attempt to emit all
members for a second time, which causes an assertion failure. Restrict
the exporting to when the `dllexport` attribute is newly introduced by
the explicit instantiation definition.
Fixes PR31608.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28590
llvm-svn: 291877
Fixes a crash in modules where the template class decl becomes the most recent
decl in the redeclaration chain and forcing the template instantiator try to
instantiate the friend declaration, rather than the template definition.
In practice, A::list<int> produces a TemplateSpecializationType
A::__1::list<int, allocator<type-parameter-0-0> >' failing to replace to
subsitute the default argument to allocator<int>.
Kudos Richard Smith (D28399).
llvm-svn: 291753
properly even when a non-type template parameter has a dependent type.
Previously, if a non-type template parameter was dependent, but not dependent
on an outer level of template parameter, we would not match the type of the
parameter. Under [temp.arg.template], we are supposed to check that the types
are equivalent, which means checking for syntactic equivalence in the dependent
case.
This also fixes some accepts-invalids when passing templates with auto-typed
non-type template parameters as template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 291512
dependent context and can't be used in a constant expression.
Per C++ [temp.inst]p2, "the instantiation of a static data member does not
occur unless the static data member is used in a way that requires the
definition to exist".
This doesn't /quite/ match that, as we still instantiate static data members
that are usable in constant expressions even if the use doesn't require a
definition. A followup patch will fix that for both variables and functions.
llvm-svn: 291295
In many translation units I have tried, the calls to isIgnored() removed
in this patch are more expensive than doing the analysis that is behind
it. The speed-up in translation units I have tried is between 10 and
20%.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28208
llvm-svn: 290842
to be specified for a template template parameter whenever the parameter is at
least as specialized as the argument (when there's an obvious and correct
mapping from uses of the parameter to uses of the argument). For example, a
template with more parameters can be passed to a template template parameter
with fewer, if those trailing parameters have default arguments.
This is disabled by default, despite being a DR resolution, as it's fairly
broken in its current state: there are no partial ordering rules to cope with
template template parameters that have different parameter lists, meaning that
code that attempts to decompose template-ids based on arity can hit unavoidable
ambiguity issues.
The diagnostics produced on a non-matching argument are also pretty bad right
now, but I aim to improve them in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 290792
to make reference to template parameters. This is only a partial
implementation; we retain the restriction that the argument must not be
type-dependent, since it's unclear how that would work given the existence of
other language rules requiring an exact type match in this context, even for
type-dependent cases (a question has been raised on the core reflector).
llvm-svn: 290647
specialized than the primary template. (Put another way, if we imagine there
were a partial specialization matching the primary template, we should never
select it if some other partial specialization also matches.)
llvm-svn: 290593
template parameters of reference type basically doesn't work, because we're
always deducing from an argument expression of non-reference type, so the type
of the deduced expression never matches. Instead, compare the type of an
expression naming the parameter to the type of the argument.
llvm-svn: 290586
dependent contexts when processing the template in C++11 and C++14, just like
we do in C++98 and C++1z. This allows us to diagnose invalid templates earlier.
llvm-svn: 290567
non-type template parameters.
During partial ordering, when checking the substituted deduced template
arguments match the original, check the types of non-type template arguments
match even if they're dependent. The only way we get dependent types here is if
they really represent types of the other template (which are supposed to be
modeled as being substituted for unique, non-dependent types).
In order to make this work for auto-typed non-type template arguments, we need
to be able to perform auto deduction even when the initializer and
(potentially) the auto type are dependent, support for which is the bulk of
this patch. (Note that this requires the ability to deduce only a single level
of a multi-level dependent type.)
llvm-svn: 290511
template arguments as written rather than the canonical template arguments,
so we print more user-friendly names for template parameters.
llvm-svn: 290483
argument even if the expression is value-dependent (we need to suppress the
final portion of the narrowing check, but the rest of the checking can still be
done eagerly).
This affects template template argument validity and partial ordering under
p0522r0.
llvm-svn: 290276
expressions in a function or class template.
This patch makes the following changes:
- Create a DependentScopeDeclRefExpr for the default argument instead of
a CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr.
- Pass CombineWithOuterScope=true so that the outer scope in which the
enum is declared is searched for the instantiation of the enum.
This is the first part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23096. Fixes PR28795
rdar://problem/27535319
llvm-svn: 289914
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
Some functions and templates are treated as __host__ __device__ even
when they don't have explicitly specified target attributes.
What's worse, this treatment may change depending on command line
options (-fno-cuda-host-device-constexpr) or
#pragma clang force_cuda_host_device.
Combined with strict checking for matching function target that comes
with D25809(r288962), it makes it hard to write code which would
explicitly instantiate or specialize some functions regardless of
pragmas or command line options in effect.
This patch changes the way we match target attributes of base template
vs attributes used in explicit instantiation or specialization so that
only explicitly specified attributes are considered. This makes base
template selection behave consistently regardless of pragma of command
line options that may affect CUDA target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25845
llvm-svn: 289091
* __host__ __device__ functions are no longer considered to be
redeclarations of __host__ or __device__ functions. This prevents
unintentional merging of target attributes across them.
* Function target attributes are not considered (and must match) during
explicit instantiation and specialization of function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25809
llvm-svn: 288962
On MSVC, if an implicit instantiation already exists and an explicit
instantiation definition with a DLL attribute is created, the DLL
attribute still takes effect. Make clang match this behavior for
exporting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26657
llvm-svn: 288682
An explicit template specialization can cause the implicit template
specialization of a type which inherits the attributes. In such a case, we
would end up with a delayed template specialization for a dll exported type
which we would fail to reference. This would trigger an assertion.
We now propagate the dll storage attributes through the inheritance
chain. Only after having done so do we reference the delayed template
specializations. This allows any implicit specializations which inherit dll
storage to also be referenced.
llvm-svn: 288570
arguments from a declaration; despite what the standard says, this form of
deduction should not be considering exception specifications.
llvm-svn: 288301
Similar to r284288, make the Itanium ABI follow MS ABI dllexport
semantics in the case of an explicit instantiation declaration followed
by a dllexport explicit instantiation definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26471
llvm-svn: 286419
This commit improves the "must have C++ linkage" error diagnostics that are
emitted for C++ declarations like templates and literal operators by adding an
additional note that points to the appropriate extern "C" linkage specifier.
rdar://19021120
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26189
llvm-svn: 285823
1) Merge and demote variable definitions when we find a redefinition in
MergeVarDecls, not only when we find one in AddInitializerToDecl (we only reach
the second case if it's the addition of the initializer itself that converts an
existing declaration into a definition).
2) When rebuilding a redeclaration chain for a variable, if we merge two
definitions together, mark the definitions as merged so the retained definition
is made visible whenever the demoted definition would have been.
Original commit message (from r283882):
[modules] PR28752: Do not instantiate variable declarations which are not visible.
Original patch by Vassil Vassilev! Changes listed above are mine.
llvm-svn: 284284
Original message:
"[modules] PR28752: Do not instantiate variable declarations which are not visible.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24508
Patch developed in collaboration with Richard Smith!"
llvm-svn: 284008
Summary:
This is possible now that MapVector supports move-only values.
Depends on D25404.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25405
llvm-svn: 283766
explicit specialization to a warning for C++98 mode (this is a defect report
resolution, so per our informal policy it should apply in C++98), and turn
the warning on by default for C++11 and later. In all cases where it fires, the
right thing to do is to remove the pointless explicit instantiation.
llvm-svn: 280308
within the instantiation of that same specialization. This could previously
happen for eagerly-instantiated function templates, variable templates,
exception specifications, default arguments, and a handful of other cases.
We still have an issue here for default template arguments that recursively
make use of themselves and likewise for substitution into the type of a
non-type template parameter, but in those cases we're producing a different
entity each time, so they should instead be caught by the instantiation depth
limit. However, currently we will typically run out of stack before we reach
it. :(
llvm-svn: 280190
to DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate, teach hasVisibleDefinition to correctly
determine whether a function definition is visible, and mark both the function
and the template as visible when merging function template definitions to
provide hasVisibleDefinition with the relevant information.
The change to always pass the right declaration as the PatternDef to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate also caused those checks to happen before other
diagnostics in InstantiateFunctionDefinition, giving worse diagnostics for the
same situations, so I sunk the relevant diagnostics into
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate. Those parts of this patch are based on changes
in reviews.llvm.org/D23492 by Vassil Vassilev.
This reinstates r279486, reverted in r279500, with a fix to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate to only mark uninstantiable explicit
instantiation declarations as invalid if we actually diagnosed them. (When we
trigger an explicit instantiation of a class member from an explicit
instantiation declaration for the class, it's OK if there is no corresponding
definition and we certainly don't want to mark the member invalid in that
case.) This previously caused a build failure during bootstrap.
llvm-svn: 279557
to DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate, teach hasVisibleDefinition to correctly
determine whether a function definition is visible, and mark both the function
and the template as visible when merging function template definitions to
provide hasVisibleDefinition with the relevant information.
The change to always pass the right declaration as the PatternDef to
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate also caused those checks to happen before other
diagnostics in InstantiateFunctionDefinition, giving worse diagnostics for the
same situations, so I sunk the relevant diagnostics into
DiagnoseUninstantiableTemplate. Those parts of this patch are based on changes
in reviews.llvm.org/D23492 by Vassil Vassilev.
llvm-svn: 279486
Summary:
Space for storing the //constraint-expression// of the
//requires-clause// associated with a `TemplateParameterList` is
arranged by taking a bit out of the `NumParams` field for the purpose
of determining whether there is a //requires-clause// or not, and by
adding to the trailing objects tied to the `TemplateParameterList`. An
accessor is provided.
An appropriate argument is supplied to `TemplateParameterList::Create`
at the various call sites.
Serialization changes will addressed as the Concepts implementation
becomes more solid.
Drive-by fix:
This change also replaces the custom
`FixedSizeTemplateParameterListStorage` implementation with one that
follows the interface provided by `llvm::TrailingObjects`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, faisalv, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, nwilson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19322
llvm-svn: 276069
After thinking about it, we don't really need to forbid
BuiltinTemplateDecls explicitly. The restriction doesn't really buy us
anything.
llvm-svn: 275078
