Process DMCA request

This commit is contained in:
Hubot 2019-06-21 13:17:12 -07:00
parent 4730655c0e
commit df31da3ddd

View File

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
**Are you the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owners behalf?**
I am a solicitor (lawyer) authorised to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
**Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.**
There are five original copyright works as follows:
1 https://github.com/QuickBlox/quickblox-android-sdk
2 https://github.com/quickblox/quickblox-javascript-sdk/tree/gh-pages/samples
3 https://github.com/QuickBlox/quickblox-javascript-sdk/tree/gh-pages/samples/chat_bots/simple_bot
4 https://github.com/QuickBlox/q-municate-services-ios
5 https://github.com/QuickBlox/QMChatViewController-ios
**What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repositorys URL:**
1 https://github.com/ConnectyCube/connectycube-android-samples
2 https://github.com/ConnectyCube/connectycube-js-samples
3 https://github.com/ConnectyCube/chat-bot-demo
4 https://github.com/ConnectyCube/sdk-ios-services
5 https://github.com/ConnectyCube/ios-chat-view-controller
**Have you searched for any forks of the allegedly infringing files or repositories? Each fork is a distinct repository and must be identified separately if you believe it is infringing and wish to have it taken down.**
Yes - fork details follow:
Public forks of https://github.com/ConnectyCube/connectycube-js-samples :
- https://github.com/akshat296/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/alfonsoappdesign/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/amirrezamds/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/anwaar2019/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/brandon1997fl/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/CubeVitaliy/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/DilkaDilukshi/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/FirstUpApp/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/gdcollect/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/gzulmc/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/imsujan276/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/lherman-cs/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/lhq220/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/michelepapale1996/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/mitulverma13/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/NilayPorwal/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/SagaRPate/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/sagoAguilar/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/shivanip2507/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/vishnujnv15/connectycube-js-samples
- https://github.com/wli-dev4/connectycube-js-samples
Public forks of https://github.com/ConnectyCube/connectycube-android-samples :
- https://github.com/Amittechzade/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/CubeRomanMagellan/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/DCOSMINC/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/gokulrajkc/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/Humanpr/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/jeyachitr/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/Montassar-net/connectycube-android-samples
- https://github.com/olaemmyfiz/connectycube-android-samples
Public forks of https://github.com/ConnectyCube/connectycube-ios-samples :
- https://github.com/abnegate/connectycube-ios-samples
- https://github.com/frankcrest/connectycube-ios-samples
- https://github.com/samreen-kaur/connectycube-ios-samples
- https://github.com/willsjah/connectycube-ios-samples
**Is the work licensed under an open source license? If so, which open source license? Are the allegedly infringing files being used under the open source license, or are they in violation of the license?**
yes, licensed under open source.
The open source licences are listed below.
The files are in violation of the licenses, in all five cases, because they have removed the copyright notices.
Details
1)Original file: QuickBlox/quickblox-android-sdk bore a copyright notice ©2015 Quickblox and was subject to open source licence BSD 2-Clause “Simplified” Licence. BSD 2-Clause simplified licence contains the following provisions at Clause 2: "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice". The infringing copy at ConnectyCube/connectycube-android-samples has not reproduced the copyright notice and that is why it is in violation of the licence.
2)the original file QuickBlox/quickblox-javascript-sdk/tree/gh-pages/samples bore a copyright notice ©2016 Quickblox (in Apache licence).Apache 2.0 licence26/4/2016 contains the following text; "(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works". But the copied work at ConnectyCube/connectycube-js-samples does not contain any prominent notice saying that it changed the files in breach of clause (b) andhas not retained the copyright notice in breach of (c) above.
3) The third original file, QuickBlox/quickblox-javascript-sdk/tree/gh-pages/samples/chat_bots/simple_bot (Apache 2.0 licence26/4/2016) bore a copyright notice ©2016 Quickblox
(in Apache licence). The Apache 2.0 licence contains the following text: "(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works"; The original copyright work at bears a copyright notice ©2016 Quickblox. But the copied work at ConnectyCube/chat-bot-demo does not contain any prominent notice saying that it changed the files in breach of clause (b) and has not retained the copyright notice in breach of (c) above.
4)the fourth original file at QuickBlox/q-municate-services-ios bore a copyright notice ©2016 Quickblox was licensed under the BSD 3-Clause licence. The BSD-3-Clause licence states: "All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution."
The infringing file at ConnectyCube/sdk-ios-services does not comply with these terms because it does not retain the Quickblox copyright notice.
5)The fifth original file at QuickBlox/QMChatViewController-ios bore a copyright notice ©2016 Quickblox and its used is also covered by the BSD 3-Clause licence. The BSD 3-Clause licence states "All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution."
The infringing file at ConnectyCube/ios-chat-view-controller does not reproduce the above copyright notice or the list of conditions.
**What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement? Are there specific changes the other person can make other than removal?** The changes the user could make to bring the project into compliance with the terms of your license is to restore the copyright notices ©Quickblox
**Can the repository be made private?**
No, making it private would just help the infringers.
**Do you have the alleged infringers contact information? If so, please provide it:**
There are three infringers working together:
1 [private]
[private]
2 [private]
3 [private]
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into consideration
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
I have read your Guide to Submitting a DMCA Takedown Notice: https://help.github.com/articles/guide-to-submitting-a-dmca-takedown-notice/
**So that we can get back to you, please provide either your telephone number or physical address:**
[private]
**Please type your full legal name below to sign this request:**
[private]