Process DMCA request

2025/03/2025-03-25-pocketbase-query-counternotice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+**Are you the owner of the content that has been disabled, or authorized to act on the owner’s behalf?**
+
+Yes, I am the content owner.
+
+**Please describe the nature of your content ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.**
+
+I am [private], the [private] and [private] of `pb-query`.
+
+**What files were taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository’s URL.**
+
+https://github.com/sergio9929/pb-query
+
+**Do you want to make changes to your repository or do you want to dispute the notice?**
+
+Dispute the notice.
+
+**Is there anything else you think we should know about why you believe the material was removed as a result of a mistake?**
+
+Good evening,
+
+A few days ago, the [private] of `pocketbase-query` asked [private] to add a reference to his library in [private] documentation and include the MIT license. Here is [private] conversation: [private]. [private] did exactly that. However, I was unaware that I needed to include his license, not just a MIT license, in [private] repository. Now that I understand the situation better, I will not do so.
+
+It is now clear to me that he believes I copied his code, but that is not true, as I already explained in this post before publishing my repository: [private]. This post "[private]" was the only content I saw before writing my own code—nothing more. I did not review his source code, download his library from [private], or use any part of it.
+
+It is true that after creating the foundation of my library, as I mentioned in my previous post, I looked at his code to compare approaches, as I did with other query builders. I noticed that he had a function called `[private]`, which he used in each basic operator. I thought it was a good name and a convenient abstraction, so I adopted it in my own implementation. That does not mean my code is his code. if I removed that, my code would still work exactly the same and be exactly the same.
+
+In our conversation [private], he could have told me that I needed to include his MIT license, and at that time, I would have done so without issue, as I wasn’t fully aware of the implications. However, now that I have a better understanding of the situation, I will not include his license because I did not copy his code, and my repository is not a fork of his project.
+
+[private] have given him proper attribution in [private] README for inspiring [private] to create `pb-query` and for the similarities in syntax, but after all the time and effort [private] have put into this project, I will not say that my code is his—because it simply isn’t.
+
+PS: I already submitted a counter notice a few days ago, but it seems there was an error and it was not sent correctly.
+
+**I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good-faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of a mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.**
+
+**I consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which my address is located (if in the United States, otherwise the Northern District of California where GitHub is located), and I will accept service of process from the person who provided the DMCA notification or an agent of such person.**
+
+**Please confirm that you have you have read our <a href="https://docs.github.com/articles/guide-to-submitting-a-dmca-counter-notice">Guide to Submitting a DMCA Counter Notice</a>.**
+
+**So that the complaining party can get back to you, please provide both your telephone number and physical address.**
+
+Telephone:  
+[private]
+
+Address:  
+[private]   
+[private]   
+[private]   
+
+**Please type your full legal name below to sign this request.**
+
+[private]