Pavel Labath 21a365ba59 NativeProcessLinux: Fix handling of raise(SIGTRAP) ... In NativeProcessLinux::MonitorSIGTRAP we were asserting that the si_code value is one of the codes we know about. However, that list was very incomplete -- for example, we were not handling SI_TKILL/SI_USER, generated by raise(SIGTRAP). A cursory examination show there are at least a dozen codes like these that an app can generate, and more can be added at any point. So, instead of trying to play catchup, I change the default behavior to treat an unknown si_code like an ordinary signal. The only reason we needed to inspect si_code in the first place is because watchpoint/breakpoints are notified as SIGTRAP, but we already know about those, and us starting to use a new debug event is far less likely than somebody introducing a new non-debug event. I add a test case to TestRaise to verify we are handling raise(SIGTRAP) in an application properly. llvm-svn: 307644		2017-07-11 10:38:40 +00:00
..
main.c	NativeProcessLinux: Fix handling of raise(SIGTRAP)	2017-07-11 10:38:40 +00:00
Makefile
TestRaise.py	NativeProcessLinux: Fix handling of raise(SIGTRAP)	2017-07-11 10:38:40 +00:00