teak-llvm/clang/test/Analysis/inline.cpp
Jordan Rose d66bee3f76 [analyzer] Don't inline virtual calls unless we can devirtualize properly.
Previously we were using the static type of the base object to inline
methods, whether virtual or non-virtual. Now, we try to see if the base
object has a known type, and if so ask for its implementation of the method.

llvm-svn: 160094
2012-07-12 00:16:25 +00:00

46 lines
912 B
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-ipa=inlining -verify %s
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
class A {
public:
int getZero() { return 0; }
virtual int getNum() { return 0; }
};
void test(A &a) {
clang_analyzer_eval(a.getZero() == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(a.getNum() == 0); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
A copy(a);
clang_analyzer_eval(copy.getZero() == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(copy.getNum() == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
class One : public A {
public:
virtual int getNum() { return 1; }
};
void testPathSensitivity(int x) {
A a;
One b;
A *ptr;
switch (x) {
case 0:
ptr = &a;
break;
case 1:
ptr = &b;
break;
default:
return;
}
// This should be true on both branches.
clang_analyzer_eval(ptr->getNum() == x); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
}