teak-llvm/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-init.cpp
Richard Smith 5159bbad8b PR38627: Fix handling of exception specification adjustment for
destructors.

We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after
completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification
was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend
redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the
destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification
immediately after creating it.

This requires delaying various checks against the exception
specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception
specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we
can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being
defined.

This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext
for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make
the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing
its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a
diagnostic quality improvement.

This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception
specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be)
results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this.

llvm-svn: 341499
2018-09-05 22:30:37 +00:00

161 lines
4.3 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
struct X0 { // expected-note 8{{candidate}}
X0(int*, float*); // expected-note 4{{candidate}}
};
template<typename T, typename U>
X0 f0(T t, U u) {
X0 x0(t, u); // expected-error{{no matching}}
return X0(t, u); // expected-error{{no matching}}
}
void test_f0(int *ip, float *fp, double *dp) {
f0(ip, fp);
f0(ip, dp); // expected-note{{instantiation}}
}
template<typename Ret, typename T, typename U>
Ret f1(Ret *retty, T t, U u) {
Ret r0(t, u); // expected-error{{no matching}}
return Ret(t, u); // expected-error{{no matching}}
}
void test_f1(X0 *x0, int *ip, float *fp, double *dp) {
f1(x0, ip, fp);
f1(x0, ip, dp); // expected-note{{instantiation}}
}
namespace PR6457 {
template <typename T> struct X { explicit X(T* p = 0) { }; };
template <typename T> struct Y { Y(int, const T& x); };
struct A { };
template <typename T>
struct B {
B() : y(0, X<A>()) { }
Y<X<A> > y;
};
B<int> b;
}
namespace PR6657 {
struct X
{
X (int, int) { }
};
template <typename>
void f0()
{
X x = X(0, 0);
}
void f1()
{
f0<int>();
}
}
// Instantiate out-of-line definitions of static data members which complete
// types through an initializer even when the only use of the member that would
// cause instantiation is in an unevaluated context, but one requiring its
// complete type.
namespace PR10001 {
template <typename T> struct S {
static const int arr[];
static const int x;
static int f();
};
template <typename T> const int S<T>::arr[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
template <typename T> const int S<T>::x = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
template <typename T> int S<T>::f() { return x; }
int x = S<int>::f();
}
namespace PR7985 {
template<int N> struct integral_c { };
template <typename T, int N>
integral_c<N> array_lengthof(T (&x)[N]) { return integral_c<N>(); } // expected-note 2{{candidate template ignored: could not match 'T [N]' against 'const Data<}}
template<typename T>
struct Data {
T x;
};
template<typename T>
struct Description {
static const Data<T> data[];
};
template<typename T>
const Data<T> Description<T>::data[] = {{ 1 }}; // expected-error{{cannot initialize a member subobject of type 'int *' with an rvalue of type 'int'}}
template<>
const Data<float*> Description<float*>::data[];
void test() {
integral_c<1> ic1 = array_lengthof(Description<int>::data);
(void)sizeof(array_lengthof(Description<float>::data));
sizeof(array_lengthof( // expected-error{{no matching function for call to 'array_lengthof'}}
Description<int*>::data // expected-note{{in instantiation of static data member 'PR7985::Description<int *>::data' requested here}}
));
array_lengthof(Description<float*>::data); // expected-error{{no matching function for call to 'array_lengthof'}}
}
}
namespace PR13064 {
// Ensure that in-class direct-initialization is instantiated as
// direct-initialization and likewise copy-initialization is instantiated as
// copy-initialization.
struct A { explicit A(int); }; // expected-note{{here}}
template<typename T> struct B { T a { 0 }; };
B<A> b;
template <typename T> struct C { // expected-note {{in instantiation of default member initializer}}
T a = {0}; // expected-error{{explicit}}
};
C<A> c; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
}
namespace PR16903 {
// Make sure we properly instantiate list-initialization.
template<typename T>
void fun (T it) {
int m = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i, ++it){
m |= long{char{*it}};
}
}
int test() {
char in[4] = {0,0,0,0};
fun(in);
}
}
namespace ReturnStmtIsInitialization {
struct X {
X() {}
X(const X &) = delete;
};
template<typename T> X f() { return {}; }
auto &&x = f<void>();
}
namespace InitListUpdate {
struct A { int n; };
using AA = A[1];
// Check that an init list update doesn't "lose" the pack-ness of an expression.
template <int... N> void f() {
g(AA{0, [0].n = N} ...); // expected-warning 3{{overrides prior init}} expected-note 3{{previous init}}
g(AA{N, [0].n = 0} ...); // expected-warning 3{{overrides prior init}} expected-note 3{{previous init}}
};
void g(AA, AA);
void h() { f<1, 2>(); } // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
}