teak-llvm/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-self-assign-builtin.cpp
Roman Lebedev 61061d69ea [Sema] Extend -Wself-assign and -Wself-assign-field to warn on overloaded self-assignment (classes)
Summary:
This has just bit me, so i though it would be nice to avoid that next time :)
Motivational case:
  https://godbolt.org/g/cq9UNk
Basically, it's likely to happen if you don't like shadowing issues,
and use `-Wshadow` and friends. And it won't be diagnosed by clang.

The reason is, these self-assign diagnostics only work for builtin assignment
operators. Which makes sense, one could have a very special operator=,
that does something unusual in case of self-assignment,
so it may make sense to not warn on that.

But while it may be intentional in some cases, it may be a bug in other cases,
so it would be really great to have some diagnostic about it...

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rtrieu, nikola, rjmccall, dblaikie

Reviewed By: rjmccall

Subscribers: EricWF, lebedev.ri, thakis, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883

llvm-svn: 329493
2018-04-07 10:39:21 +00:00

68 lines
1.7 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wself-assign -verify %s
void f() {
int a = 42, b = 42;
a = a; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
b = b; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
a = b;
b = a = b;
a = a = a; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
a = b = b = a;
a *= a;
a /= a;
a %= a;
a += a;
a -= a;
a <<= a;
a >>= a;
a &= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}}
a |= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}}
a ^= a;
}
// Dummy type.
struct S {};
void false_positives() {
#define OP =
#define LHS a
#define RHS a
int a = 42;
// These shouldn't warn due to the use of the preprocessor.
a OP a;
LHS = a;
a = RHS;
LHS OP RHS;
#undef OP
#undef LHS
#undef RHS
// A way to silence the warning.
a = (int &)a;
// Volatile stores aren't side-effect free.
volatile int vol_a;
vol_a = vol_a;
volatile int &vol_a_ref = vol_a;
vol_a_ref = vol_a_ref;
}
// Do not diagnose self-assigment in an unevaluated context
void false_positives_unevaluated_ctx(int a) noexcept(noexcept(a = a)) // expected-warning {{expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context}}
{
decltype(a = a) b = a; // expected-warning {{expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context}}
static_assert(noexcept(a = a), ""); // expected-warning {{expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context}}
static_assert(sizeof(a = a), ""); // expected-warning {{expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context}}
}
template <typename T>
void g() {
T a;
a = a; // expected-warning{{explicitly assigning}}
}
void instantiate() {
g<int>();
g<S>();
}