teak-llvm/clang/test/Analysis/initialization.c
Rafael Stahl 0137aa8679 [analyzer] const init: handle non-explicit cases more accurately
Summary: If the access is out of bounds, return UndefinedVal. If it is missing an explicit init, return the implicit zero value it must have.

Reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, george.karpenkov

Reviewed By: NoQ

Subscribers: szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46823

llvm-svn: 333417
2018-05-29 14:14:22 +00:00

29 lines
713 B
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-apple-darwin10 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core.builtin,debug.ExprInspection -verify %s
void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
void initbug() {
const union { float a; } u = {};
(void)u.a; // no-crash
}
int const parr[2] = {1};
void constarr() {
int i = 2;
clang_analyzer_eval(parr[i]); // expected-warning{{UNDEFINED}}
i = 1;
clang_analyzer_eval(parr[i] == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
i = -1;
clang_analyzer_eval(parr[i]); // expected-warning{{UNDEFINED}}
}
struct SM {
int a;
int b;
};
const struct SM sm = {.a = 1};
void multinit() {
clang_analyzer_eval(sm.a == 1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(sm.b == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}