teak-llvm/clang/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
Jordan Rose 81125c4497 [analyzer] Push "references are non-null" knowledge up to the common parent.
This reduces duplication across the Basic and Range constraint managers, and
keeps their internals free of dealing with the semantics of C++. It's still
a little unfortunate that the constraint manager is dealing with this at all,
but this is pretty much the only place to put it so that it will apply to all
symbolic values, even when embedded in larger expressions.

llvm-svn: 162313
2012-08-21 20:52:19 +00:00

152 lines
3.4 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,experimental.core,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-store=region -analyzer-constraints=basic -verify -Wno-null-dereference %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,experimental.core,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-store=region -analyzer-constraints=range -verify -Wno-null-dereference %s
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
typedef typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t;
void malloc (size_t);
void f1() {
int const &i = 3;
int b = i;
int *p = 0;
if (b != 3)
*p = 1; // no-warning
}
char* ptr();
char& ref();
// These next two tests just shouldn't crash.
char t1 () {
ref() = 'c';
return '0';
}
// just a sanity test, the same behavior as t1()
char t2 () {
*ptr() = 'c';
return '0';
}
// Each of the tests below is repeated with pointers as well as references.
// This is mostly a sanity check, but then again, both should work!
char t3 () {
char& r = ref();
r = 'c'; // no-warning
if (r) return r;
return *(char*)0; // no-warning
}
char t4 () {
char* p = ptr();
*p = 'c'; // no-warning
if (*p) return *p;
return *(char*)0; // no-warning
}
char t5 (char& r) {
r = 'c'; // no-warning
if (r) return r;
return *(char*)0; // no-warning
}
char t6 (char* p) {
*p = 'c'; // no-warning
if (*p) return *p;
return *(char*)0; // no-warning
}
// PR13440 / <rdar://problem/11977113>
// Test that the array-to-pointer decay works for array references as well.
// More generally, when we want an lvalue for a reference field, we still need
// to do one level of load.
namespace PR13440 {
typedef int T[1];
struct S {
T &x;
int *m() { return x; }
};
struct S2 {
int (&x)[1];
int *m() { return x; }
};
void test() {
int a[1];
S s = { a };
S2 s2 = { a };
if (s.x != a) return;
if (s2.x != a) return;
a[0] = 42;
clang_analyzer_eval(s.x[0] == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(s2.x[0] == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
}
void testNullReference() {
int *x = 0;
int &y = *x; // expected-warning{{Dereference of null pointer}}
y = 5;
}
void testRetroactiveNullReference(int *x) {
// According to the C++ standard, there is no such thing as a
// "null reference". So the 'if' statement ought to be dead code.
// However, Clang (and other compilers) don't actually check that a pointer
// value is non-null in the implementation of references, so it is possible
// to produce a supposed "null reference" at runtime. The analyzer shoeuld
// still warn when it can prove such errors.
int &y = *x;
if (x != 0)
return;
y = 5; // expected-warning{{Dereference of null pointer}}
}
void testReferenceAddress(int &x) {
clang_analyzer_eval(&x != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(&ref() != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
struct S { int &x; };
extern S *getS();
clang_analyzer_eval(&getS()->x != 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
// This actually takes a different path, because it's not a BinaryOperator.
clang_analyzer_eval(&getS()->x); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
// ------------------------------------
// False negatives
// ------------------------------------
namespace rdar11212286 {
class B{};
B test() {
B *x = 0;
return *x; // should warn here!
}
B &testRef() {
B *x = 0;
return *x; // should warn here!
}
}
void testReferenceFieldAddress() {
struct S { int &x; };
extern S getS();
clang_analyzer_eval(&getS().x != 0); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}