teak-llvm/clang/test/Sema/implicit-builtin-redecl.c
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00

27 lines
486 B
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// PR3592
static void* malloc(int);
static void* malloc(int size) {
return ((void*)0); /*do not use heap in this file*/
}
void *calloc(int, int, int); // expected-warning{{incompatible redeclaration of library function 'calloc'}} \
// expected-note{{'calloc' is a builtin with type 'void *}}
void f1(void) {
calloc(0, 0, 0);
}
void f2() {
int index = 1;
}
static int index;
int f3() {
return index << 2;
}
typedef int rindex;