teak-llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/commands/command/source/TestCommandSource.py
Raphael Isemann a52a11139c [lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests that don't actually call 'print()'
Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.

Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
2019-12-13 12:23:04 +01:00

35 lines
1.1 KiB
Python

"""
Test that lldb command "command source" works correctly.
"""
import lldb
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
class CommandSourceTestCase(TestBase):
mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
@no_debug_info_test
def test_command_source(self):
"""Test that lldb command "command source" works correctly."""
# Sourcing .lldb in the current working directory, which in turn imports
# the "my" package that defines the date() function.
self.runCmd("command source .lldb")
# Python should evaluate "my.date()" successfully.
command_interpreter = self.dbg.GetCommandInterpreter()
self.assertTrue(command_interpreter, VALID_COMMAND_INTERPRETER)
result = lldb.SBCommandReturnObject()
command_interpreter.HandleCommand("script my.date()", result)
import datetime
self.expect(result.GetOutput(), "script my.date() runs successfully",
exe=False,
substrs=[str(datetime.date.today())])