mirror of
https://github.com/Gericom/teak-llvm.git
synced 2025-06-19 19:45:40 -04:00
a52a11139c
Summary: A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`. Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file. I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives). I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited. Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
22 lines
504 B
Python
22 lines
504 B
Python
"""
|
|
Test that backticks without a target should work (not infinite looping).
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import lldb
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
|
|
|
|
|
|
class BackticksWithNoTargetTestCase(TestBase):
|
|
|
|
mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
|
|
|
|
@no_debug_info_test
|
|
def test_backticks_no_target(self):
|
|
"""A simple test of backticks without a target."""
|
|
self.expect("print `1+2-3`",
|
|
substrs=[' = 0'])
|