mirror of
https://github.com/Gericom/teak-llvm.git
synced 2025-06-19 03:25:54 -04:00
f7766b1ed4
The warnings now in -Wformat-type-confusion don't align with how we interpret 'pedantic' in clang, and don't belong in -pedantic. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67775 llvm-svn: 373774
21 lines
884 B
C
21 lines
884 B
C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-format -Wformat-pedantic %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -xobjective-c -fblocks -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-format -Wformat-pedantic %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -xc++ -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-format -Wformat-pedantic %s
|
|
|
|
__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
|
|
int printf(const char *restrict, ...);
|
|
|
|
int main() {
|
|
printf("%p", (int *)0); // expected-warning {{format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has type 'int *'}}
|
|
printf("%p", (void *)0);
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __OBJC__
|
|
printf("%p", ^{}); // expected-warning {{format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has type 'void (^)(void)'}}
|
|
printf("%p", (id)0); // expected-warning {{format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has type 'id'}}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
|
printf("%p", nullptr); // expected-warning {{format specifies type 'void *' but the argument has type 'nullptr_t'}}
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|