Fails with all versions of arm/aarch64 gcc available on ubuntu 16.04/14.04.
Passes with Linaro GCC version >= 4.8 but fails with >= 5.0. But There are other regressions when we use Linaro GCC.
llvm-svn: 286574
The debug info emitted by clang for static variables improved by
rL286302 and it exposed an incorrect test expactation because now LLDB
able to displays more data 9thanks to better debug info) then before.
llvm-svn: 286360
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Clang on ARM64 was making the three Function methods with identical bodies have
one implementation that was shared. That threw off the count of breakpoints, since
we don't count as separate locations three functions with the same address.
I also cleaned up the test case while I was at it.
<rdar://problem/27001915>
llvm-svn: 279800
Summary:
referencing a user-defined operator new was triggering an assert in clang because we were
registering the function name as string "operator new", instead of using the special operator
enum, which clang has for this purpose. Method operators already had code to handle this, and now
I extend this to cover free standing operator functions as well. Test included.
Reviewers: spyffe
Subscribers: sivachandra, paulherman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17856
llvm-svn: 278670
It's always hard to remember when to include this file, and
when you do include it it's hard to remember what preprocessor
check it needs to be behind, and then you further have to remember
whether it's windows.h or win32.h which you need to include.
This patch changes the name to PosixApi.h, which is more appropriately
named, and makes it independent of any preprocessor setting.
There's still the issue of people not knowing when to include this,
because there's not a well-defined set of things it exposes other
than "whatever is missing on Windows", but at least this should
make it less painful to fix when problems arise.
This patch depends on LLVM revision r278170.
llvm-svn: 278177
Summary:
One of the tests there does not work with gcc, so I'm spinning that off into a separate test, so
that we can XFAIL it with more granularity.
I am also renaming the test to reflect the fact that it no longer tests only integer arguments.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21923
llvm-svn: 274505
We were checking for integer types only before this. So I added the ability for CompilerType objects to check for integer and enum types.
Then I searched for places that were using the CompilerType::IsIntegerType(...) function. Many of these places also wanted to be checking for enumeration types as well, so I have fixed those places. These are in the ABI plug-ins where we are figuring out which arguments would go in where in regisers/stack when making a function call, or determining where the return value would live. The real fix for this is to use clang to compiler a CGFunctionInfo and then modify the code to be able to take the IR and a calling convention and have the backend answer the questions correctly for us so we don't need to create a really bad copy of the ABI in each plug-in, but that is beyond the scope of this bug fix.
Also added a test case to ensure this doesn't regress in the future.
llvm-svn: 273750
Prior to this we would display the typename for "TestObj<-1>" as "TestObj<4294967295>" when we showed the type. Expression parsing could also fail because we would fail to find the mangled name when evaluating expressions.
The issue was we were losing the signed'ness of the template integer parameter in DWARFASTParserClang.cpp.
<rdar://problem/25577041>
llvm-svn: 272434
This enables a couple of tests which have been shown to run reliably on the
linux x86 buildbot. If you see a failure after this commit, feel free to add
the xfail back, but please make it as specific as possible (i.e., try to make
it not cover i386/x86_64 with clang-3.5, clang-3.9 or gcc-4.9).
llvm-svn: 272326
If a lldbinline test's source file changed language, then the Makefile wasn't
updated. This was a problem if the Makefile was checked into the repository.
Now lldbinline.py always regenerates the Makefile and asserts if the
newly-generated version is not the same as the one already there. This ensures
that the repository will never be out of date without a buildbot failing.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21032
llvm-svn: 272024
Some compilers do not mark up C++ functions as extern "C" in the DWARF, so LLDB
has to fall back (if it is about to give up finding a symbol) to using the base
name of the function.
This fix also ensures that we search by full name rather than "auto," which
could cause unrelated C++ names to be found. Finally, it adds a test case.
<rdar://problem/25094302>
llvm-svn: 271551
This change adds the capability of building test inferiors
with the -gmodules flag to enable module debug info support.
Windows is excluded per @zturner.
Reviewers: granata.enrico, aprantl, zturner, labath
Subscribers: zturner, labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19998
llvm-svn: 270848
Summary:
using stdio in tests does not work on windows, and it is not completely reliable on linux.
Avoid using stdio in this test, as it is not necessary for this purpose.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, zturner
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20567
llvm-svn: 270831
Remove XFAIL from some tests that now pass.
Add XFAIL to some tests that now fail.
Fix a crasher where a null pointer check isn't guarded.
Properly handle all types of errors in SymbolFilePDB.
llvm-svn: 269454
1. Fixed semicolon placement in the lambda in the test itself.
2. Fixed lldbinline tests in general so that we don't attempt tests on platforms that don't use the given type of debug info. (For example, no DWO tests on Windows.) This fixes one of the two failures on Windows. (TestLambdas.py was the only inline test that wasn't XFailed or skipped on Windows.)
3. Set the error string in IRInterpreter::CanInterpret so that the caller doesn't print (null) instead of an explanation. I don't entirely understand the error, so feel free to suggest a better wording.
4. XFailed the test on Windows. The interpreter won't evaluate the lambda because the module has multiple function bodies. I don't exactly understand why that's a problem for the interpreter nor why the problem arises only on Windows.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19606
llvm-svn: 268573
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration
in 'foo' member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 268083
This reverts commit r267833 as it breaks the build. It looks like some work in progress got
committed together with the actual fix, but I'm not sure which one is which, so I'll revert the
whole patch and let author resumbit it after fixing the build error.
llvm-svn: 267861
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration in 'foo'
member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 267833
A number of test cases were failing on big-endian systems simply due to
byte order assumptions in the tests themselves, and no underlying bug
in LLDB.
These two test cases:
tools/lldb-server/lldbgdbserverutils.py
python_api/process/TestProcessAPI.py
actually check for big-endian target byte order, but contain Python errors
in the corresponding code paths.
These test cases:
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-python-synth/TestDataFormatterPythonSynth.py
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-smart-array/TestDataFormatterSmartArray.py
functionalities/data-formatter/synthcapping/TestSyntheticCapping.py
lang/cpp/frame-var-anon-unions/TestFrameVariableAnonymousUnions.py
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (first change)
could be fixed to check for big-endian target byte order and update the
expected result strings accordingly. For the two synthetic tests, I've
also updated the source to make sure the fake_a value is always nonzero
on both big- and little-endian platforms.
These test case:
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (second change)
functionalities/memory/cache/TestMemoryCache.py
simply accessed memory with the wrong size, which wasn't noticed on LE
but fails on BE.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18985
llvm-svn: 266315
the main reason is that our decorator contains extra fluff to "expect" crashes (which seem to
happen occasionaly on the android buildbot).
llvm-svn: 263633
The inlining semantics for C and C++ are different, which affects the test's expectation of the number of times the function should appear in the binary. In the case of this test, C semantics means there should be three instances of inner_inline, while C++ semantics means there should be only two.
On Windows, clang uses C++ inline semantics even for C code, and there doesn't seem to be a combination of compiler flags to avoid this.
So, for consistency, I've recast the test to use C++ everywhere. Since the test resided under lang/c, it seemed appropriate to move it to lang/cpp.
This does not address the other XFAIL for this test on Linux/gcc. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17650
llvm-svn: 262255
Both Linux and FreeBSD had a comment "This needs to be root-caused."
It looks like the failure has been fixed on both, and the Linux XFAIL
decorator was removed in r233716 (Mar 2015).
llvm-svn: 261333
CFLAGS is now being set correctly to pass -flimit-debug-info or
-fno-limit-debug-info on FreeBSD. I'm not sure which change is
responsible for the fix, though.
llvm.org/pr25626
llvm-svn: 260330
