There are six separate instances of getPointerOperand() utility.
LoopVectorize.cpp has one of them,
and I don't want to create a 7th one while I'm trying to move
LoopVectorizationLegality into a separate file
(eventual objective is to move it to Analysis tree).
See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-February/120999.html
for llvm-dev discussions
Closes D43323.
Patch by Hideki Saito <hideki.saito@intel.com>.
llvm-svn: 327173
Fixes PR36311.
See more detailed analysis in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36311.
isUniform() information is recomputed after LV started transforming the
underlying IR and that triggered an assert in SCEV.
From vectorizer's architectural perspective, such information, while
still useful in vector code gen, should not be recomputed after the
start of transforming the LLVM IR. Instead, we should collect and cache
such information during the analysis phase of LV and use the cached info
during code gen.
From the symptom perspective, this assert as it stands right now is not
very useful. Legality already rejected loops that would trigger the
assert. As such, commenting out the assert is NFC from vectorizer's
functionality perspective. On top of that, just above the assertion, we
check for unit-strided load/store or
gather scatter. Addresses can't be uniform below that check.
From vectorization theory point of view, we don't have to reject all
cases of stores to uniform addresses. Eventually, we should support
safe/profitable cases.
This patch resolves the issue by removing the useless assertion that is
invoking LAA's isUniform() that requires up-to-date DomTree ---- once
vector code gen starts modifying CFG, we don't have an up-to-date
DomTree.
Patch by Hideki Saito <hideki.saito@intel.com>.
llvm-svn: 327109
Summary: GCN ISA supports instructions that can read 16 consecutive dwords from memory through the scalar data cache;
loadstoreVectorizer should take advantage of the wider vector length and pack 16/8 elements of dwords/quadwords.
Author: FarhanaAleen
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: llvm-commits, AMDGPU
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44179
llvm-svn: 326910
The LoadStoreVectorizer thought that <1 x T> and T were the same types
when merging stores, leading to a crash later.
Patch by Erik Hogeman.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44014
llvm-svn: 326884
This patch adds support for detecting outer loops with irreducible control
flow in LV. Current detection uses SCCs and only works for innermost loops.
This patch adds a utility function that works on any CFG, given its RPO
traversal and its LoopInfoBase. This function is a generalization
of isIrreducibleCFG from lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp. The code in
lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp is also updated to use the new generic utility
function.
Patch by Diego Caballero <diego.caballero@intel.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40874
llvm-svn: 326568
Removes verifyDomTree, using assert(verify()) everywhere instead, and
changes verify a little to always run IsSameAsFreshTree first in order
to print good output when we find errors. Also adds verifyAnalysis for
PostDomTrees, which will allow checking of PostDomTrees it the same way
we check DomTrees and MachineDomTrees.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41298
llvm-svn: 326315
All SIMD architectures can emulate masked load/store/gather/scatter
through element-wise condition check, scalar load/store, and
insert/extract. Therefore, bailing out of vectorization as legality
failure, when they return false, is incorrect. We should proceed to cost
model and determine profitability.
This patch is to address the vectorizer's architectural limitation
described above. As such, I tried to keep the cost model and
vectorize/don't-vectorize behavior nearly unchanged. Cost model tuning
should be done separately.
Please see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120164.html for
RFC and the discussions.
Closes D43208.
Patch by: Hideki Saito <hideki.saito@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 326079
Summary:
Reversed loads are handled as gathering. But we can just reshuffle
these values. Patch adds support for vectorization of reversed loads.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43022
llvm-svn: 325134
Making a width of GEP Index, which is used for address calculation, to be one of the pointer properties in the Data Layout.
p[address space]:size:memory_size:alignment:pref_alignment:index_size_in_bits.
The index size parameter is optional, if not specified, it is equal to the pointer size.
Till now, the InstCombiner normalized GEPs and extended the Index operand to the pointer width.
It works fine if you can convert pointer to integer for address calculation and all registered targets do this.
But some ISAs have very restricted instruction set for the pointer calculation. During discussions were desided to retrieve information for GEP index from the Data Layout.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120416.html
I added an interface to the Data Layout and I changed the InstCombiner and some other passes to take the Index width into account.
This change does not affect any in-tree target. I added tests to cover data layouts with explicitly specified index size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42123
llvm-svn: 325102
Summary:
For better vectorization result we should take into consideration the
cost of the user insertelement instructions when we try to
vectorize sequences that build the whole vector. I.e. if we have the
following scalar code:
```
<Scalar code>
insertelement <ScalarCode>, ...
```
we should consider the cost of the last `insertelement ` instructions as
the cost of the scalar code.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, hfinkel, mkuper
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42657
llvm-svn: 324893
Summary:
If -pass-remarks=loop-vectorize, atomic ops will be seen by
analyzeInterleaving(), even though canVectorizeMemory() == false. This
is because we are requesting extra analysis instead of bailing out.
In such a case, we end up with a Group in both Load- and StoreGroups,
and then we'll try to access freed memory when traversing LoadGroups after having had released the Group when iterating over StoreGroups.
The fix is to include mayWriteToMemory() when validating that two
instructions are the same kind of memory operation.
Reviewers: mssimpso, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: hsaito, fhahn, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43064
llvm-svn: 324786
Summary:
Loops with inequality comparers, such as:
// unsigned bound
for (unsigned i = 1; i < bound; ++i) {...}
have getSmallConstantMaxTripCount report a large maximum static
trip count - in this case, 0xffff fffe. However, profiling info
may show that the trip count is much smaller, and thus
counter-recommend vectorization.
This change:
- flips loop-vectorize-with-block-frequency on by default.
- validates profiled loop frequency data supports vectorization,
when static info appears to not counter-recommend it. Absence
of profile data means we rely on static data, just as we've
done so far.
Reviewers: twoh, mkuper, davidxl, tejohnson, Ayal
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: bkramer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42946
llvm-svn: 324543
The type-shrinking logic in reduction detection, although narrow in scope, is
also rather ad-hoc, which has led to bugs (e.g., PR35734). This patch modifies
the approach to rely on the demanded bits and value tracking analyses, if
available. We currently perform type-shrinking separately for reductions and
other instructions in the loop. Long-term, we should probably think about
computing minimal bit widths in a more complete way for the loops we want to
vectorize.
PR35734
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42309
llvm-svn: 324195
Summary:
If the same value is going to be vectorized several times in the same
tree entry, this entry is considered to be a gather entry and cost of
this gather is counter as cost of InsertElementInstrs for each gathered
value. But we can consider these elements as ShuffleInstr with
SK_PermuteSingle shuffle kind.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38697
llvm-svn: 323662
Summary:
If the same value is going to be vectorized several times in the same
tree entry, this entry is considered to be a gather entry and cost of
this gather is counter as cost of InsertElementInstrs for each gathered
value. But we can consider these elements as ShuffleInstr with
SK_PermuteSingle shuffle kind.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38697
llvm-svn: 323530
Summary:
If the same value is going to be vectorized several times in the same
tree entry, this entry is considered to be a gather entry and cost of
this gather is counter as cost of InsertElementInstrs for each gathered
value. But we can consider these elements as ShuffleInstr with
SK_PermuteSingle shuffle kind.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38697
llvm-svn: 323441
Summary:
If the same value is going to be vectorized several times in the same
tree entry, this entry is considered to be a gather entry and cost of
this gather is counter as cost of InsertElementInstrs for each gathered
value. But we can consider these elements as ShuffleInstr with
SK_PermuteSingle shuffle kind.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38697
llvm-svn: 323430
Summary:
If the same value is going to be vectorized several times in the same
tree entry, this entry is considered to be a gather entry and cost of
this gather is counter as cost of InsertElementInstrs for each gathered
value. But we can consider these elements as ShuffleInstr with
SK_PermuteSingle shuffle kind.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38697
llvm-svn: 323348
Summary:
If the same value is going to be vectorized several times in the same
tree entry, this entry is considered to be a gather entry and cost of
this gather is counter as cost of InsertElementInstrs for each gathered
value. But we can consider these elements as ShuffleInstr with
SK_PermuteSingle shuffle kind.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, mkuper, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38697
llvm-svn: 323246
Summary:
If the vectorized tree has truncate to minimum required bit width and
the vector type of the cast operation after the truncation is the same
as the vector type of the cast operands, count cost of the vector cast
operation as 0, because this cast will be later removed.
Also, if the vectorization tree root operations are integer cast operations, do not consider them as candidates for truncation. It will just create extra number of the same vector/scalar operations, which will be removed by instcombiner.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, mkuper, hfinkel, mssimpso
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41948
llvm-svn: 322946
Summary: Sometimes vectorization of insertelement instructions with extractelement operands may produce an extra shuffle operation, if these operands are in the reverse order. Patch tries to improve this situation by the reordering of the operands to remove this extra shuffle operation.
Reviewers: mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33954
llvm-svn: 322579
Summary:
This method is supposed to be called for IVs that have casts in their use-def
chains that are completely ignored after vectorization under PSE. However, for
truncates of such IVs the same InductionDescriptor is used during
creation/widening of both original IV based on PHINode and new IV based on
TruncInst.
This leads to unintended second call to recordVectorLoopValueForInductionCast
with a VectorLoopVal set to the newly created IV for a trunc and causes an
assert due to attempt to store new information for already existing entry in the
map. This is wrong and should not be done.
Fixes PR35773.
Reviewers: dorit, Ayal, mssimpso
Reviewed By: dorit
Subscribers: RKSimon, dim, dcaballe, hsaito, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41913
llvm-svn: 322473
Summary:
Fixes the bug with incorrect handling of InsertValue|InsertElement
instrucions in SLP vectorizer. Currently, we may use incorrect
ExtractElement instructions as the operands of the original
InsertValue|InsertElement instructions.
Reviewers: mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41767
llvm-svn: 321994
Summary:
If the vectorized value is marked as extra reduction argument, its users
are not considered as external users. Patch fixes this.
Reviewers: mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41786
llvm-svn: 321993
The approach was never discussed, I wasn't able to reproduce this
non-determinism, and the original author went AWOL.
After a discussion on the ML, Philip suggested to revert this.
llvm-svn: 321974
Another small step forward to move VPlan stuff outside of LoopVectorize.cpp.
VPlanBuilder.h is renamed to LoopVectorizationPlanner.h
LoopVectorizationPlanner class is moved from LoopVectorize.cpp to
LoopVectorizationPlanner.h LoopVectorizationCostModel::VectorizationFactor
class is moved to LoopVectorizationPlanner.h (used by the planner class) ---
this needs further streamlining work in later patches and thus all I did was
take it out of the CostModel class and moved to the header file. The callback
function had to stay inside LoopVectorize.cpp since it calls an
InnerLoopVectorizer member function declared in it. Next Steps: Make
InnerLoopVectorizer, LoopVectorizationCostModel, and other classes more modular
and more aligned with VPlan direction, in small increments.
Previous step was: r320900 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41045)
Patch by Hideki Saito, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420
llvm-svn: 321962
canVectorize is only checking if the loop has a normalized pre-header if DoExtraAnalysis is true.
This doesn't make sense to me because reporting analysis information shouldn't alter legality
checks. This is probably the result of a last minute minor change before committing (?).
Patch by Diego Caballero.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40973
llvm-svn: 321172
Changes to the original scalar loop during LV code gen cause the return value
of Legal->isConsecutivePtr() to be inconsistent with the return value during
legal/cost phases (further analysis and information of the bug is in D39346).
This patch is an alternative fix to PR34965 following the CM_Widen approach
proposed by Ayal and Gil in D39346. It extends InstWidening enum with
CM_Widen_Reverse to properly record the widening decision for consecutive
reverse memory accesses and, consequently, get rid of the
Legal->isConsetuviePtr() call in LV code gen. I think this is a simpler/cleaner
solution to PR34965 than the one in D39346.
Fixes PR34965.
Patch by Diego Caballero, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40742
llvm-svn: 320913
This is a small step forward to move VPlan stuff to where it should belong (i.e., VPlan.*):
1. VP*Recipe classes in LoopVectorize.cpp are moved to VPlan.h.
2. Many of VP*Recipe::print() and execute() definitions are still left in
LoopVectorize.cpp since they refer to things declared in LoopVectorize.cpp. To
be moved to VPlan.cpp at a later time.
3. InterleaveGroup class is moved from anonymous namespace to llvm namespace.
Referencing it in anonymous namespace from VPlan.h ended up in warning.
Patch by Hideki Saito, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41045
llvm-svn: 320900
In SLPVectorizer, the vector build instructions (insertvalue for aggregate type) is passed to BoUpSLP.buildTree, it is treated as UserIgnoreList, so later in cost estimation, the cost of these instructions are not counted.
For aggregate value, later usage are more likely to be done in scalar registers, either used as individual scalars or used as a whole for function call or return value. Ignore scalar extraction instructions may cause too aggressive vectorization for aggregate values, and slow down performance. So for vectorization of aggregate value, the scalar extraction instructions are required in cost estimation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41139
llvm-svn: 320736
D30041 extended SCEVPredicateRewriter to improve handling of Phi nodes whose
update chain involves casts; PSCEV can now build an AddRecurrence for some
forms of such phi nodes, under the proper runtime overflow test. This means
that we can identify such phi nodes as an induction, and the loop-vectorizer
can now vectorize such inductions, however inefficiently. The vectorizer
doesn't know that it can ignore the casts, and so it vectorizes them.
This patch records the casts in the InductionDescriptor, so that they could
be marked to be ignored for cost calculation (we use VecValuesToIgnore for
that) and ignored for vectorization/widening/scalarization (i.e. treated as
TriviallyDead).
In addition to marking all these casts to be ignored, we also need to make
sure that each cast is mapped to the right vector value in the vector loop body
(be it a widened, vectorized, or scalarized induction). So whenever an
induction phi is mapped to a vector value (during vectorization/widening/
scalarization), we also map the respective cast instruction (if exists) to that
vector value. (If the phi-update sequence of an induction involves more than one
cast, then the above mapping to vector value is relevant only for the last cast
of the sequence as we allow only the "last cast" to be used outside the
induction update chain itself).
This is the last step in addressing PR30654.
llvm-svn: 320672
Summary:
This patch tries to vectorize loads of consecutive memory accesses, accessed
in non-consecutive or jumbled way. An earlier attempt was made with patch D26905
which was reverted back due to some basic issue with representing the 'use mask' of
jumbled accesses.
This patch fixes the mask representation by recording the 'use mask' in the usertree entry.
Change-Id: I9fe7f5045f065d84c126fa307ef6ebe0787296df
Reviewers: mkuper, loladiro, Ayal, zvi, danielcdh
Reviewed By: Ayal
Subscribers: mgrang, dcaballe, hans, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36130
llvm-svn: 320548
