expression (a * b + c) that can be implemented as a fused multiply-add (fma)
if the target determines that this will be more efficient. This intrinsic
will be used to implement FP_CONTRACT support and an aggressive FMA formation
mode.
If your target has a fast FMA instruction you should override the
isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd method in TargetLowering to return true.
llvm-svn: 158014
IntegersSubsetGeneric, IntegersSubsetMapping: added IntTy template parameter, that allows use either APInt or IntItem. This change allows to write unittest for these classes.
llvm-svn: 157880
IntegersSubset devided into IntegersSubsetGeneric and into IntegersSubset itself. The first has no references to ConstantInt and works with IntItem only.
IntegersSubsetMapping also made generic. Here added second template parameter "IntegersSubsetTy" that allows to use on of two IntegersSubset types described below.
llvm-svn: 157815
Implemented IntItem - the wrapper around APInt. Why not to use APInt item directly right now?
1. It will very difficult to implement case ranges as series of small patches. We got several large and heavy patches. Each patch will about 90-120 kb. If you replace ConstantInt with APInt in SwitchInst you will need to changes at the same time all Readers,Writers and absolutely all passes that uses SwitchInst.
2. We can implement APInt pool inside and save memory space. E.g. we use several switches that works with 256 bit items (switch on signatures, or strings). We can avoid value duplicates in this case.
3. IntItem can be easyly easily replaced with APInt.
4. Currenly we can interpret IntItem both as ConstantInt and as APInt. It allows to provide SwitchInst methods that works with ConstantInt for non-updated passes.
Why I need it right now? Currently I need to update SimplifyCFG pass (EqualityComparisons). I need to work with APInts directly a lot, so peaces of code
ConstantInt *V = ...;
if (V->getValue().ugt(AnotherV->getValue()) {
...
}
will look awful. Much more better this way:
IntItem V = ConstantIntVal->getValue();
if (AnotherV < V) {
}
Of course any reviews are welcome.
P.S.: I'm also going to rename ConstantRangesSet to IntegersSubset, and CRSBuilder to IntegersSubsetMapping (allows to map individual subsets of integers to the BasicBlocks).
Since in future these classes will founded on APInt, it will possible to use them in more generic ways.
llvm-svn: 157576
SimplifyCFG tends to form a lot of 2-3 case switches when merging branches. Move
the most likely condition to the front so it is checked first and the others can
be skipped. This is currently not as effective as it could be because SimplifyCFG
destroys profiling metadata when merging branches and switches. Merging branch
weight metadata is tricky though.
This code touches at most 3 cases so I didn't use a proper sorting algorithm.
llvm-svn: 157521
to pass around a struct instead of a large set of individual values. This
cleans up the interface and allows more information to be added to the struct
for future targets without requiring changes to each and every target.
NV_CONTRIB
llvm-svn: 157479
SelectionDAGBuilder::Clusterify : main functinality was replaced with CRSBuilder::optimize, so big part of Clusterify's code was reduced.
llvm-svn: 157046
This is the CodeGen equivalent of r153747. I tested that there is not noticeable
performance difference with any combination of -O0/-O2 /-g when compiling
gcc as a single compilation unit.
llvm-svn: 153817
Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.
llvm-svn: 152532
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120130/136146.html
Implemented CaseIterator and it solves almost all described issues: we don't need to mix operand/case/successor indexing anymore. Base iterator class is implemented as a template since it may be initialized either from "const SwitchInst*" or from "SwitchInst*".
ConstCaseIt is just a read-only iterator.
CaseIt is read-write iterator; it allows to change case successor and case value.
Usage of iterator allows totally remove resolveXXXX methods. All indexing convertions done automatically inside the iterator's getters.
Main way of iterator usage looks like this:
SwitchInst *SI = ... // intialize it somehow
for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->caseBegin(), e = SI->caseEnd(); i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *BB = i.getCaseSuccessor();
ConstantInt *V = i.getCaseValue();
// Do something.
}
If you want to convert case number to TerminatorInst successor index, just use getSuccessorIndex iterator's method.
If you want initialize iterator from TerminatorInst successor index, use CaseIt::fromSuccessorIndex(...) method.
There are also related changes in llvm-clients: klee and clang.
llvm-svn: 152297
When the GEP index is a vector of pointers, the code that calculated the size
of the element started from the vector type, and not the contained pointer type.
As a result, instead of looking at the data element pointed by the vector, this
code used the size of the vector. This works for 32bit members (on 32bit
systems), but not for other types. Added code to peel the vector type and
added a test.
llvm-svn: 151626
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
llvm-svn: 151623
variable declaration as an argument because we want that address
anyhow for our debug information.
This seems to fix rdar://9965111, at least we have more debug
information than before and from reading the assembly it appears
to be the correct location.
llvm-svn: 151335
The purpose of refactoring is to hide operand roles from SwitchInst user (programmer). If you want to play with operands directly, probably you will need lower level methods than SwitchInst ones (TerminatorInst or may be User). After this patch we can reorganize SwitchInst operands and successors as we want.
What was done:
1. Changed semantics of index inside the getCaseValue method:
getCaseValue(0) means "get first case", not a condition. Use getCondition() if you want to resolve the condition. I propose don't mix SwitchInst case indexing with low level indexing (TI successors indexing, User's operands indexing), since it may be dangerous.
2. By the same reason findCaseValue(ConstantInt*) returns actual number of case value. 0 means first case, not default. If there is no case with given value, ErrorIndex will returned.
3. Added getCaseSuccessor method. I propose to avoid usage of TerminatorInst::getSuccessor if you want to resolve case successor BB. Use getCaseSuccessor instead, since internal SwitchInst organization of operands/successors is hidden and may be changed in any moment.
4. Added resolveSuccessorIndex and resolveCaseIndex. The main purpose of these methods is to see how case successors are really mapped in TerminatorInst.
4.1 "resolveSuccessorIndex" was created if you need to level down from SwitchInst to TerminatorInst. It returns TerminatorInst's successor index for given case successor.
4.2 "resolveCaseIndex" converts low level successors index to case index that curresponds to the given successor.
Note: There are also related compatability fix patches for dragonegg, klee, llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, safecode, clang.
llvm-svn: 149481
Before we'd get:
$ clang t.c
fatal error: error in backend: Invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'!
Now we get:
$ clang t.c
t.c:16:5: error: invalid operand for inline asm constraint 'i'!
"movq (%4), %%mm0\n"
^
Which at least gets us the inline asm that is the problem.
llvm-svn: 147502
undefined result. This adds new ISD nodes for the new semantics,
selecting them when the LLVM intrinsic indicates that the undef behavior
is desired. The new nodes expand trivially to the old nodes, so targets
don't actually need to do anything to support these new nodes besides
indicating that they should be expanded. I've done this for all the
operand types that I could figure out for all the targets. Owners of
various targets, please review and let me know if any of these are
incorrect.
Note that the expand behavior is *conservatively correct*, and exactly
matches LLVM's current behavior with these operations. Ideally this
patch will not change behavior in any way. For example the regtest suite
finds the exact same instruction sequences coming out of the code
generator. That's why there are no new tests here -- all of this is
being exercised by the existing test suite.
Thanks to Duncan Sands for reviewing the various bits of this patch and
helping me get the wrinkles ironed out with expanding for each target.
Also thanks to Chris for clarifying through all the discussions that
this is indeed the approach he was looking for. That said, there are
likely still rough spots. Further review much appreciated.
llvm-svn: 146466
change, now you need a TargetOptions object to create a TargetMachine. Clang
patch to follow.
One small functionality change in PTX. PTX had commented out the machine
verifier parts in their copy of printAndVerify. That now calls the version in
LLVMTargetMachine. Users of PTX who need verification disabled should rely on
not passing the command-line flag to enable it.
llvm-svn: 145714
dropping weights on the floor for invokes. This was impeding my writing
further test cases for invoke when interacting with probabilities and
block placement.
No test case as there doesn't appear to be a way to test this stuff. =/
Suggestions for a test case of course welcome. I hope to be able to add
test cases that indirectly cover this eventually by adding probabilities
to the exceptional edge and reordering blocks as a result.
llvm-svn: 145060
When this field is true it means that the load is from constant (runt-time or compile-time) and so can be hoisted from loops or moved around other memory accesses
llvm-svn: 144100
This code makes different decisions when compiled into x87 instructions
because of different rounding behavior. That caused phase 2/3
miscompares on 32-bit Linux when the phase 1 compiler was built with gcc
(using x87), and the phase 2 compiler was built with clang (using SSE).
This fixes PR11200.
llvm-svn: 143006
This isn't put into the 'clear()' method because the information needs to stick
around (at least for a little bit) after the selection DAG is built.
llvm-svn: 142032
The inline asm operand constraint is initially encoded in the virtual
register for the operand, but that register class may change during
coalescing, and the original constraint is lost.
Encode the original register class as part of the flag word for each
inline asm operand. This makes it possible to recover the actual
constraint required by inline asm, just like we can for normal
instructions.
llvm-svn: 141833
This intrinsic is used to pass the index of the function context to the back-end
for further processing. The back-end is in charge of filling in the rest of the
entries.
llvm-svn: 140676
with a vector condition); such selects become VSELECT codegen nodes.
This patch also removes VSETCC codegen nodes, unifying them with SETCC
nodes (codegen was actually often using SETCC for vector SETCC already).
This ensures that various DAG combiner optimizations kick in for vector
comparisons. Passes dragonegg bootstrap with no testsuite regressions
(nightly testsuite as well as "make check-all"). Patch mostly by
Nadav Rotem.
llvm-svn: 139159
init.trampoline and adjust.trampoline intrinsics, into two intrinsics
like in GCC. While having one combined intrinsic is tempting, it is
not natural because typically the trampoline initialization needs to
be done in one function, and the result of adjust trampoline is needed
in a different (nested) function. To get around this llvm-gcc hacks the
nested function lowering code to insert an additional parent variable
holding the adjust.trampoline result that can be accessed from the child
function. Dragonegg doesn't have the luxury of tweaking GCC code, so it
stored the result of adjust.trampoline in the memory GCC set aside for
the trampoline itself (this is always available in the child function),
and set up some new memory (using an alloca) to hold the trampoline.
Unfortunately this breaks Go which allocates trampoline memory on the
heap and wants to use it even after the parent has exited (!). Rather
than doing even more hacks to get Go working, it seemed best to just use
two intrinsics like in GCC. Patch mostly by Sanjoy Das.
llvm-svn: 139140
I don't really like the patterns, but I'm having trouble coming up with a
better way to handle them.
I plan on making other targets use the same legalization
ARM-without-memory-barriers is using... it's not especially efficient, but
if anyone cares, it's not that hard to fix for a given target if there's
some better lowering.
llvm-svn: 138621
