I have a big patch coming up, and this indirection is required to avoid hitting the following after my big change:
error: empty struct has size 0 in C, size 1 in C++ [-Werror,-Wextern-c-compat]
llvm-svn: 350772
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
Summary:
r306722 added diagnostics when aligned allocation is used with deployment
targets that do not support it, but the first macosx supporting aligned
allocation was incorrectly set to 10.13. In reality, the dylib shipped
with macosx10.13 does not support aligned allocation, but the dylib
shipped with macosx10.14 does.
Reviewers: ahatanak
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56445
llvm-svn: 350649
We already have a specialization that will use memcpy for construction
of trivial types from an iterator range like
std::vector<int>(int *, int *);
But if we have const-ness mismatch like
std::vector<int>(const int *, const int *);
we would use a slow path that copies each element individually. This change
enables the optimal specialization for const-ness mismatch. Fixes PR37574.
Contributions to the patch are made by Arthur O'Dwyer, Louis Dionne.
rdar://problem/40485845
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, ldionne, scanon
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, ldionne, howard.hinnant, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48342
llvm-svn: 350583
This patch changes <experimental/foo> to use #warning instead of
is harmful to common feature detection idioms.
We should also consider only emitting the warning when __DEPRECATED is
defined, like we do in the <ext/foo> headers. Users may want to specify
"-Werror=-W#warnings" while still ignoring the libc++ warnings.
llvm-svn: 350485
last_write_time(sym, new_time) changes the modification time of the file
referenced by the symlink. But reading through the symlink may change the
symlinks's access time.
This meant the previous test that checked that the symlinks access
time was unchanged was incorrect and made the test flaky.
This patch removes this test (there really is no non-flaky way
to test that the new access time coorisponds to the time at which
the symlink was last dereferenced). This should unflake the test.
llvm-svn: 350478
This patch implements path::compare according to the current spec. The
only observable change is the ordering of "/foo" and "foo", which orders
the two paths based on having or not having a root directory (instead
of lexically comparing "/" to "foo").
llvm-svn: 349881
Some tests assume that iteration through an unordered multimap elements
will return them in the same order as at the container creation. This
assumption is not true since the container is unordered, so that no
specific order of elements is ever guaranteed for such container. This
patch introduces checks verifying that any iteration will return elements
exactly from a set of valid values and without repetition, but in no
particular order.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54838.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 349780
Makes libc++ behavior consistent between C++03 and C++11.
Can use `decltype` in C++03 because `include/__config` defines a macro when
`decltype` is not available.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, erik.pilkington, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits, howard.hinnant, ldionne, christof, jkorous, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48753
llvm-svn: 349676
That test doesn't fail anymore since r349378, since the assertions that
r349378 removed must have been bugs in the dylib at some point.
llvm-svn: 349484
This test was initially marked as XFAIL using `XFAIL: macosx10.YY`, and
was then moved to `UNSUPPORTED: macosx10.YY`. The intent is to mark the
test as XFAILing when a deployment target older than macosx10.14 is used,
and the right way to do this is `XFAIL: availability=macosx10.YY`.
llvm-svn: 349426
Add a target_info definition for NetBSD. The definition is based
on the one used by FreeBSD, with libcxxrt replaced by libc++abi,
and using llvm-libunwind since we need to use its unwinder
implementation to build anyway.
Additionally, XFAIL the 30 tests that fail because of non-implemented
locale features. According to the manual, NetBSD implements only
LC_CTYPE part of locale handling. However, there is a locale database
in the system and locale specifications are validated against it,
so it makes sense to list the common locales as supported.
If I'm counting correctly, this change enables additional 43 passing
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55767
llvm-svn: 349379
Remove the two test cases for \xDA and \xFA with UTF-8 locale, as both
characters alone are invalid in UTF-8 (short sequences). Upon removing
them, the test passes on Linux again (and also on NetBSD, after adding
appropriate locale configuration).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55746
llvm-svn: 349378
This is a re-application of r345525, which had been reverted by fear of
a regression.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D53994.
Thanks to Denis Yaroshevskiy for the patch.
llvm-svn: 349358
Replace the mknod() call with socket() + bind() for creating unix
sockets. The mknod() method is not portable and does not work
on NetBSD while binding the socket should work on all systems supporting
unix sockets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55576
llvm-svn: 349305
Explicitly disable the -Wformat-zero-length diagnostic when running
ctime tests, since one of the test cases passes zero-length format
string to strftime(). When strftime() is appropriately decorated
with __attribute__(format, ...), this caused the test to fail because
of this warning (e.g. on NetBSD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55661
llvm-svn: 349294
Also, add tests making sure that vector and deque both catch the problem
when assertions are enabled. Otherwise, deque would segfault and vector
would never terminate.
llvm-svn: 348994
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
Summary:
When providing a non-const-callable comparator in a map or set, the
warning diagnostic does not include the point of instantiation of
the container that triggered the warning, which makes it difficult
to track down the problem. This commit improves the diagnostic by
placing it directly in the body of the associative container.
The same change is applied to unordered associative containers, which
had a similar problem.
Finally, this commit cleans up the forward declarations of several
map and unordered_map helpers, which are not needed anymore.
<rdar://problem/41370747>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48955
llvm-svn: 348529
The tests were marked to fail based on the 'availability' LIT feature.
However, those tests should really only be failing when we run them
against the dylibs that were deployed on macosx10.7 and macosx10.8,
which the deployment target has nothing to do with.
This caused the tests to unexpectedly pass when running the tests
with deployment target macosx10.{7,8} but running with a recent dylib.
llvm-svn: 348520
The standard section [array.zero] requires the return value of begin()
and end() methods of a zero-sized array to be unique. Eric Fiselier
clarifies: "That unique value cannot be null, and must be properly aligned".
This patch adds checks for the first part of this clarification: unique
value returned by these methods cannot be null.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55366.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348509
The section array.zero says: "The return value of data() is unspecified".
This patch marks all checks of the array<T, 0>.data() return value as
libc++ specific.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55364.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348485
Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not
a matter of availability markup.
This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly
marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition
of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of
whether visibility annotations are enabled.
llvm-svn: 348436
Summary:
This was voted into C++20 in San Diego. Note that there was a revision
D0318R2 which did include unwrap_reference_t, but we mistakingly voted
P0318R1 into the C++20 Working Draft (which does not include
unwrap_reference_t). This patch implements D0318R2, which is what
we'll end up with in the Working Draft once this mistake has been
fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54485
llvm-svn: 348138
The test was previously marked as unsupported on all Apple platforms, when
we really just want to mark it as unsupported for previously shipped dylibs
on macosx.
llvm-svn: 347920
Summary:
std::bad_array_length was added by n3467, but this never made it into C++.
This commit removes the definition of std::bad_array_length from the headers
AND from the shared library. See the comments in the ABI changelog for details
about the ABI implications of this change.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, dexonsmith, howard.hinnant, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54804
llvm-svn: 347903
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
std::dynarray had been proposed for C++14, but it was pulled out from C++14
and there are no plans to standardize it anymore.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54801
llvm-svn: 347783
This patch adds an implementation of __resize_default_init as
described in P1072R2. Additionally, it uses it in filesystem to
demonstrate its intended utility.
Once P1072 lands, or if it changes it's interface, I will adjust
the internal libc++ implementation to match.
llvm-svn: 347589
In r339743, I marked several aligned allocation tests as downright
unsupported on macosx in an attempt to unbreak the build. It turns
out that marking them as unuspported whenever we're on OS X is way
too coarse grained. This commit marks the tests as XFAIL with more
granularity.
llvm-svn: 347585
The test was marked as failing whenever the deployment target was 10.12
or older, but in reality the test passes when the deployment target is
10.12 on recent Clangs. This happens because only older clangs do not
honor the -faligned-allocation flag, which disables any availability
error related to aligned allocation support, regardless of the
deployment target.
llvm-svn: 347580
Summary:
In PR39232, we noticed that some variant tests started failing in C++2a mode
with recent Clangs, because the rules for literal types changed in C++2a. As
a result, a temporary fix was checked in (enabling the test only in C++17).
This commit is what I believe should be the long term fix: I removed the
tests that checked constexpr default-constructibility with a weird type
from the tests for index() and valueless_by_exception(), and instead I
added tests for those using an obviously literal type in the test for the
default constructor.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54767
llvm-svn: 347568
This is a revert of r347421, except I'm using the with_system_cxx_lib
lit feature instead of availability to mark the test as unsupported
(because the problem is a bug in the dylib itself). In r347421, I said
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue and that's why I was removing it:
this was because I ran lit slightly wrong. The problem mentioned really
exists.
llvm-svn: 347475
The iterator types for different specializations of containers with the
same element type but different allocators are not required to be
convertible. This patch makes the test to take the iterator type from
the same container specialization as the created container.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54806.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347423
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue referred to by the comment using
the libc++'s shipped with mac OS X 10.7 and 10.8, so I assume this may
have been fixed in a function that is now shipped in the headers. In
that case, the tests will pass no matter what dylib we're using.
In the worst case, some test bots will start failing and I'll understand
why I was wrong, and I can create an actual lit feature for it. Note
that I could just leave this test alone, but this change is on the path
towards eradicating vendor-specific availability markup from the test
suite.
llvm-svn: 347421
The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
llvm-svn: 347264
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
A bunch of unordered containers tests call library functions but don't directly
include the corresponding header files:
- fabs() (defined in <cmath> which is not included);
- is_permutation() (defined in <algorithm> which is not included);
- next() (defined in <iterator> which is not included).
- As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54643.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347085
This was implicitly converting [1, 3] to bool, which triggers
an MSVC warning. The test should just pass `true`, which is
simpler, has the same behavior, and avoids the warning. (This
is a library test, not a compiler test, and the conversion happens
before calling `push_back`, so passing [1, 3] isn't interesting
in any way. This resembles a previous change to stop passing
`1 == 1` in the `vector<bool>` tests.)
llvm-svn: 346910
This patch renames the cxx-benchmark-unittests to check-cxx-benchmarks
and converts the target to use LIT in order to make the tests run faster
and provide better output.
In particular this runs each benchmark in a suite one by one, allowing
more parallelism while ensuring output isn't garbage with multiple threads.
Additionally, it adds the CMake flag '-DLIBCXX_BENCHMARK_TEST_ARGS=<list>'
to specify what options are passed when running the benchmarks.
llvm-svn: 346888
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
llvm-svn: 346764
This patch adds tests to ensure that multiset/unordered_multiset's emplace
method correctly constructs the elements without any intervening
constructions.
llvm-svn: 346743
Summary:
This fixes an regression when using bionic introduced in r345173.
I need to follow up and figure out what exactly is implied by
TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES and see what the correct configuration is for
bionic (new versions should have everything the tests care about,
versions that predate C11 certainly don't), but this gets the tests
back to the old behavior.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mclow.lists, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53956
llvm-svn: 345900
This reverts r345525. I'm reverting because that patch apparently caused
a regression on certain platforms (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D53994).
Since we don't fully understand the reasons for the regression, I'm
reverting until we can provide a fix we understand.
llvm-svn: 345893
This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
The types/comparators passed to std::upper_bound and std::lower_bound
are not required to provided to provide an operator</comp(...) which
accepts the arguments in reverse order. Nor are the ranges required
to have a strict weak ordering.
However, in debug mode we attempted to check the result of a comparison
with the arguments reversed, which may not compiler.
This patch removes the use of the debug comparator for upper_bound
and lower_bound.
equal_range et al still use debug comparators when they call
__upper_bound and __lower_bound.
See llvm.org/PR39458
llvm-svn: 345434
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345281
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
This reverts commits r333103 and r333108. _Float16 and __fp16 are C11
extensions and compilers other than Clang don't define these for C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53670
llvm-svn: 345199
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
The test is trying to avoid saying aligned_alloc on Windows' UCRT, which does not (and can not) implement aligned_alloc. However, it's testing for c1xx, meaning clang on Windows will fail this test when using the UCRT.
llvm-svn: 344829
In this example, the ctor of G runs in the main thread in the expression G(), and also in the copy ctor of G() in the DECAY_COPY inside std::thread. The main thread destroys the G() instance at the semicolon, and the started thread destroys the G() after it returns. Thus there is a race between the threads on the n_alive variable.
The fix is to join with the background thread before attempting to destroy the G in the main thread.
llvm-svn: 344820
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
While __cplusplus was only used a few dozen times, TEST_STD_VAR is used
more than 2000 times. So we replace the former by the latter for
consistency in the tests. There should be no functional change.
llvm-svn: 344194
Summary:
Scoped capabilities need to be annotated as such, otherwise the thread
safety analysis won't work as intended.
Fixes PR39234.
Reviewers: ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53049
llvm-svn: 344096
PR38682 added a test to check for a race condition in std::future.
Part of the fix is part of the dylib, but there is no released version
of mac OS X that ships a dylib containing the fix. Hence, this test can
(and sometimes does) when testing on OS X. This commit marks the test
as unsupported to avoid spurious failures.
llvm-svn: 344053
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
One of the SIMD tests attempted to left shift a value by 42, which
is UB when the left hand side is a 32 bit integer type.
This patch adjusts the test to use the value 4 instead of 42.
llvm-svn: 342820
In rL342814, i have committed a blind fix to unbreak the asan buildbot,
but as it was later discussed, the leak is intentional,
so we can not fix the failure that way.
So this reverts the leak 'fix',
and simply disables the test in the presence of ASAN.
llvm-svn: 342819
Summary:
The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended
applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms:
1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion,
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using
additional macros.
Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer
dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For
example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`.
Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled
by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`.
This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev),
then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF
Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179
llvm-svn: 342808
This reverts r342566 as it causes on bots linker errors like
> Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
> "std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(std::nullptr_t)", referenced from:
llvm-svn: 342599
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
Summary:
This commit fixes a regression introduced in r316095, where we don't match
inverted character classes when there's no negated characrers in the []'s.
rdar://problem/43060054
Reviewers: mclow.lists, timshen, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50534
llvm-svn: 340609
Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
It looks like this test XPASSes when the deployment target is older than
the OS of the system the test is running on. It looks like we run the
tests with -mmacosx-version-min=10.12, and that makes the test expect to
fail, but it passes.
llvm-svn: 340427
These algorithms require a ForwardIterator or better. Ensure
we diagnose the contract violation at compile time instead of
of silently doing the wrong thing.
Further algorithms will be audited in upcoming patches.
llvm-svn: 340426
Summary:
When a seed sequence would lead to having no non-zero significant bits
in the initial state of a `mersenne_twister_engine`, the fallback is to
flip the most significant bit of the first value that appears in the
textual representation of the initial state.
rand.eng.mers describes this as setting the value to be 2 to the power
of one less than w; the previous value encoded in the implementation,
namely one less than "2 to the power of w", is replaced by the correct
value in this patch.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, jasonliu
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mclow.lists, jasonliu, EricWF, christof, ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50736
llvm-svn: 339969
Because FreeBSD uses _M in its <sys/types.h>, and it is hard to avoid
including that header, only define _M to NASTY_MACRO for other operating
systems. This fixes almost 2000 unexpected test failures.
Discussed with Eric Fiselier.
llvm-svn: 339794
Summary:
Since r338934, Clang emits an error when aligned allocation functions are
used in conjunction with a system libc++ dylib that does not support those
functions. This causes some tests to fail when testing against older libc++
dylibs. This commit marks those tests as UNSUPPORTED, and also documents the
various reasons for the tests being unsupported.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, mclow.lists, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50341
llvm-svn: 339743
Summary:
Those tests are breaking the test bots. A Bugzilla has been filed to
make sure those tests are re-enabled: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38572
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50748
llvm-svn: 339742
Summary:
The macro was not defined in C++11 mode when it should have been, at least
according to how _LIBCPP_HAS_C11_FEATURES is defined.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, jfb, dexonsmith
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50719
llvm-svn: 339702
Summary:
These #includes are quite important, since otherwise any
#if TEST_STD_VER > 14 && defined(TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES)
checks are always false, and so we don't actually test for C11 support
in the standard library.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50674
llvm-svn: 339675
Summary:
The current code enables aligned allocation functions when compiling in C++17
and later. This is a problem because aligned allocation functions might not
be supported on the target platform, which leads to an error at link time.
Since r338934, Clang knows not to define __cpp_aligned_new when it's not
available on the target platform -- this commit takes advantage of that to
only use aligned allocation functions when they are available.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50344
llvm-svn: 339431
(Still pending review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47400 which has been open since may; will ask for forgiveness rather than permission :) )
llvm-svn: 339214
I'm not sure if libcxx is asserting UTF-8 here; but on Windows the full char value is always passed through in its entirety, since the default codepage is something like Windows-1252. The replacement character is only used for non-chars there; and that should be a more portable test everywhere.
(Still pending review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47395 which has been open since may; will ask for forgiveness rather than permission :) )
llvm-svn: 339213
Summary:
Major QoI considerations:
- The facility is backported to C++14, same as libstdc++.
- Efforts have been made to minimize the header dependencies.
- The design is friendly to the uses of MSVC intrinsics (`__emulu`, `_umul128`, `_BitScanForward`, `_BitScanForward64`) but not implemented; future contributions are welcome.
Thanks to Milo Yip for contributing the implementation of `__u64toa` and `__u32toa`.
References:
https://wg21.link/p0067r5https://wg21.link/p0682r1
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: ldionne, Quuxplusone, christof, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41458
llvm-svn: 338479
This commit adds a node handle type, (located in __node_handle), and adds
extract() and insert() members to all map and set types, as well as their
implementations in __tree and __hash_table.
The second half of this feature is adding merge() members, which splice nodes
in bulk from one container into another. This will be committed in a follow-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46845
llvm-svn: 338472
Summary:
This patch adds a new macro _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VECTOR_EXTENSION for detecting
whether a vector extension (\_\_attribute\_\_((vector_size(num_bytes)))) is
available.
On the top of that, this patch implements the following API:
* all constructors
* operator[]
* copy_from
* copy_to
It also defines simd_abi::native to use vector extension, if available.
In GCC and Clang, certain values with vector extension are passed by registers,
instead of memory.
Based on D41148.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MaskRay, lichray, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41376
llvm-svn: 338309
The bots were failing to build the cxx_filesystem target, so the
tests were failing. Though this does lead me to wonder how it
was ever working with c++experimental.
llvm-svn: 338095
This patch implements the <filesystem> header and uses that
to provide <experimental/filesystem>.
Unlike other standard headers, the symbols needed for <filesystem>
have not yet been placed in libc++.so. Instead they live in the
new libc++fs.a library. Users of filesystem are required to link this
library. (Also note that libc++experimental no longer contains the
definition of <experimental/filesystem>, which now requires linking libc++fs).
The reason for keeping <filesystem> out of the dylib for now is that
it's still somewhat experimental, and the possibility of requiring an
ABI breaking change is very real. In the future the symbols will likely
be moved into the dylib, or the dylib will be made to link libc++fs automagically).
Note that moving the symbols out of libc++experimental may break user builds
until they update to -lc++fs. This should be OK, because the experimental
library provides no stability guarantees. However, I plan on looking into
ways we can force libc++experimental to automagically link libc++fs.
In order to use a single implementation and set of tests for <filesystem>, it
has been placed in a special `__fs` namespace. This namespace is inline in
C++17 onward, but not before that. As such implementation is available
in C++11 onward, but no filesystem namespace is present "directly", and
as such name conflicts shouldn't occur in C++11 or C++14.
llvm-svn: 338093
Summary:
The ``file_time_type`` time point is used to represent the write times for files.
Its job is to act as part of a C++ wrapper for less ideal system interfaces. The
underlying filesystem uses the ``timespec`` struct for the same purpose.
However, the initial implementation of ``file_time_type`` could not represent
either the range or resolution of ``timespec``, making it unsuitable. Fixing
this requires an implementation which uses more than 64 bits to store the
time point.
I primarily considered two solutions: Using ``__int128_t`` and using a
arithmetic emulation of ``timespec``. Each has its pros and cons, and both
come with more than one complication.
However, after a lot of consideration, I decided on using `__int128_t`. This patch implements that change.
Please see the [FileTimeType Design Document](http://libcxx.llvm.org/docs/DesignDocs/FileTimeType.html) for more information.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, joerg, arthur.j.odwyer, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, K-ballo, cfe-commits, BillyONeal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49774
llvm-svn: 337960
Tuple has tests that ensure we diagnose non-lifetime extended
reference bindings inside tuples constructors. As of yesterday,
Clang now does this for us.
Adjust the test to tolerate the new diagnostics, while still
testing that we emit diagnostics of our own. Maybe after this
version of Clang has been adopted by most users we should
remove our diagnostics; but for now more error detection is
better!
llvm-svn: 337905
Libc++ was incorrectly reporting an error when the target of create_directory
already exists, but was not a directory. This behavior is not specified
in the most recent standard, which says no error should be reported.
Additionally, libc++ failed to report an error when the attribute directory
path didn't exist or didn't name a directory. This has been fixed as well.
Although it's not clear if we should call status or symlink_status on the
attribute directory. This patch chooses to still call status.
llvm-svn: 337888
Previously the <experimental/filesystem> didn't guard its
contents in any dialect. However, the implementation implicitly
requires at least C++11, and the tests have always been marked
unsupported in C++03. This patch puts a header guard around the
contents to avoid exposing them before C++11.
Additionally, it replaces all of the usages of _NOEXCEPT or
_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR with the keyword directly, since we can
expect the compiler to implement those by now.
llvm-svn: 337884
Summary:
This is not guaranteed to work since the characters after '__has_include('
have special lexing rules that can't possibly be applied when
__has_include is generated by a macro. It also breaks the crash reproducers
generated by -frewrite-includes (see https://llvm.org/pr37990).
Reviewers: EricWF, rsmith, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49067
llvm-svn: 337824
When adding the new tests for the filesystem_error::what method,
I incorrectly removed a test case and replaced it with something else.
This patch restores that test case
llvm-svn: 337764
This patch implements the `what()` for filesystem errors. The message
includes the 'what_arg', any paths that were specified, and the
error code message.
Additionally this patch refactors how errors are created, making it easier
to report them correctly.
llvm-svn: 337664
This patch improves both the performance, and the safety of the
copy_file implementation.
The performance improvements are achieved by using sendfile on
Linux and copyfile on OS X when available.
The TOCTOU hardening is achieved by opening the source and
destination files and then using fstat to check their attributes to
see if we can copy them.
Unfortunately for the destination file, there is no way to open
it without accidentally creating it, so we first have to use
stat to determine if it exists, and if we should copy to it.
Then, once we're sure we should try to copy, we open the dest
file and ensure it names the same entity we previously stat'ed.
llvm-svn: 337649
First, <experimental/filesystem> didn't correctly guard
against min/max macros. This adds the proper push/pop macro guards.
Second, an internal time helper had been renamed but the test for
it hadn't been updated. This patch updates those tests.
llvm-svn: 337520
Summary:
This patch implements directory_entry caching *almost* as specified in P0317r1. However, I explicitly chose to deviate from the standard as I'll explain below.
The approach I decided to take is a fully caching one. When `refresh()` is called, the cache is populated by calls to `stat` and `lstat` as needed.
During directory iteration the cache is only populated with the `file_type` as reported by `readdir`.
The cache can be in the following states:
* `_Empty`: There is nothing in the cache (likely due to an error)
* `_IterSymlink`: Created by directory iteration when we walk onto a symlink only the symlink file type is known.
* `_IterNonSymlink`: Created by directory iteration when we walk onto a non-symlink. Both the regular file type and symlink file type are known.
* `_RefreshSymlink` and `_RefreshNonSymlink`: A full cache created by `refresh()`. This case includes dead symlinks.
* `_RefreshSymlinkUnresolved`: A partial cache created by refresh when we fail to resolve the file pointed to by a symlink (likely due to permissions). Symlink attributes are cached, but attributes about the linked entity are not.
As mentioned, this implementation purposefully deviates from the standard. According to some readings of the specification, and the Windows filesystem implementation, the constructors and modifiers which don't pass an `error_code` must throw when the `directory_entry` points to a entity which doesn't exist. or when attribute resolution fails for another reason.
@BillyONeal has proposed a more reasonable set of requirements, where modifiers other than refresh ignore errors. This is the behavior libc++ currently implements, with the expectation some form of the new language will be accepted into the standard.
Some additional semantics which differ from the Windows implementation:
1. `refresh` will not throw when the entry doesn't exist. In this case we can still meet the functions specification, so we don't treat it as an error.
2. We don't clear the path name when a constructor fails via refresh (this will hopefully be changed in the standard as well).
It should be noted that libstdc++'s current implementation has the same behavior as libc++, except for point (2).
If the changes to the specification don't get accepted, we'll be able to make the changes later.
[1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0317r1.html
Reviewers: mclow.lists, gromer, ldionne, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: BillyONeal, christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49530
llvm-svn: 337516
* Remove unused type from is_assignable.pass.cpp
* Don't specialize `common_type<::X<float>>` in common_type.pass.cpp, which violates the requirements of [meta.trans.other]/5
llvm-svn: 336618
When built against the old libc++ version the test was causing linker error
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::pmr::new_delete_resource()", referenced from:
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV0>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV1>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV2>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV3>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV0>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV1>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV2>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
...
llvm-svn: 334431
C++2a[container.requirements.general]p8 states that when move constructing
a container, the allocator is move constructed. Vector previously copy
constructed these allocators. This patch fixes that bug.
Additionally it cleans up some unnecessary allocator conversions
when copy constructing containers. Libc++ uses
__internal_allocator_traits::select_on_copy_construction to select
the correct allocator during copy construction, but it unnecessarily
converted the resulting allocator to the user specified allocator
type and back. After this patch list and forward_list no longer
do that.
Technically we're supposed to be using allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_copy_construction,
but that should seemingly be addressed as a separate patch, if at all.
llvm-svn: 334053
Summary:
The filesystem test was confused about access versus write / modification time. The spec says:
file_time_type last_write_time(const path& p, error_code& ec) noexcept;
Returns: The time of last data modification of p, determined as if by the value of the POSIX stat structure member st_mtime obtained as if by POSIX stat(). The signature with argument ec returns file_time_type::min() if an error occurs.
The test was looking at st_atime, not st_mtime, when comparing the result from last_write_time. That was probably due to using a pair instead of naming things nicely or using types. I opted to rename things so it's clearer.
This used to cause test bot failures.
<rdar://problem/40648859>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, aemerson
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47557
llvm-svn: 333723
Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
In the TS, `uses_allocator` construction for `pair` tried to use an allocator
type of `memory_resource*`, which is incorrect because `memory_resource*` is
not an allocator type. LWG 2969 fixed it to use `polymorphic_allocator` as the
allocator type instead.
https://wg21.link/lwg2969
(D47090 included this in `<memory_resource>`; at Eric's request, I've split
this out into its own patch applied to the existing
`<experimental/memory_resource>` instead.)
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D47109
llvm-svn: 333384
That's r333325, as well as follow-up "Fix GCC handling of ATOMIC_VAR_INIT"
r333327.
Marshall asked to revert:
Let's have a discussion about how to implement this so that it is more friendly
to people with installed code bases. We've had *extremely* loud responses to
unilaterally adding warnings - especially ones that can't be easily disabled -
to the libc++ code base in the past.
llvm-svn: 333351
r333325 from D47225 added warning checks, and the test was written to be C++11 correct by using ATOMIC_VAR_INIT (note that the committee fixed that recently...). It seems like GCC can't handle ATOMIC_VAR_INIT well because it generates 'type 'std::atomic<int>' cannot be initialized with an initializer list' on bot libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03. Drop the ATOMIC_VAR_INITs since they weren't required to test the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 333327
Summary:
The atomic non-member functions accept pointers to std::atomic / std::atomic_flag as well as to the non-atomic value. These are all dereferenced unconditionally when lowered, and therefore will fault if null. It's a tiny gotcha for new users, especially when they pass in NULL as expected value (instead of passing a pointer to a NULL value). We can therefore use the nonnull attribute to denote that:
- A warning should be generated if the argument is null
- It is undefined behavior if the argument is null (because a dereference will segfault)
This patch adds support for this attribute for clang and GCC, and sticks to the subset of the syntax both supports. In particular, work around this GCC oddity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60625
The attributes are documented:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
- https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nullability-attributes
I'm authoring a companion clang patch for the __c11_* and __atomic_* builtins, which currently only warn on a subset of the pointer parameters.
In all cases the check needs to be explicit and not use the empty nonnull list, because some of the overloads are for atomic<T*> and the values themselves are allowed to be null.
<rdar://problem/18473124>
Reviewers: arphaman, EricWF
Subscribers: aheejin, christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47225
llvm-svn: 333325
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
llvm-svn: 332040
Atomics in C and C++ are incompatible at the moment and mixing the
headers can result in confusing error messages.
Emit an error explicitly telling about the incompatibility. Introduce
the macro `__ALLOW_STDC_ATOMICS_IN_CXX__` that allows to choose in C++
between C atomics and C++ atomics.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
llvm-svn: 331379
When using an old version of glibc, a ::isinf(double) and ::isnan(double)
function is provided, rather than just the macro required by C and C++.
Displace this function using _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD where possible.
The only remaining case where we should get the wrong return type is now
glibc + libc++ + a non-clang compiler.
llvm-svn: 331241
seekoff.pass.cpp:
libc++'s tests are asserting things about the buffer passed to pubsetbuf. [filebuf.virtuals]/12 says that what the filebuf does with the buffer you give it is completely implementation defined. The MSVC++ implementation takes that buffer and hands it off to the CRT (by calling ::setvbuf) and the CRT doesn't necessarily follow the pattern this test wants.
This change simply makes asserts against the buffer's contents use LIBCPP_ASSERT instead of assert.
pbackfail.pass.cpp:
libc++'s tests are asserting about what characters will and will not be available in the putback area. [filebuf.virtuals]/9 says "The function can alter the number of putback positions available as a result of any call." This change LIBCPP_ASSERTS libc++'s behavior, but checks invariants of the putback area independently.
llvm-svn: 330999
Be defensive against a reentrant std::function::operator=(nullptr_t), in case
the held function object has a non-trivial destructor. Destroying the function
object in-place can lead to the destructor being called twice.
Patch by Duncan P. N. Exon Smith. C++03 support by Volodymyr Sapsai.
rdar://problem/32836603
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34331
llvm-svn: 330885
These io_error asserts that std::errc::is_a_directory has message "Is a directory". On MSVC++ it reports "is a directory" (with a lowercase I). That doesn't matter for the ios_failure component being tested, so just implement in terms of system_category().message().
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D45715
llvm-svn: 330791
There are 3 changes:
* Renamed genertor.pass.cpp to generator.pass.cpp
* Removed nothing_to_do.pass.cpp
* Mark GCC 4.9 as UNSUPPORTED for the test files that have negative
narrowing conversion SFINAE test (see GCC PR63723).
llvm-svn: 330655
Summary:
The patch includes all declarations, and also implements the following features:
* ABI.
* narrowing-conversion related SFIANE, including simd<> ctors and (static_)simd_cast.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: lichray, sanjoy, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41148
llvm-svn: 330627
This test code triggers the MSVC warning:
"unary minus operator applied to unsigned type, result still unsigned"
Although it would be possible to change the test code to avoid
this warning, I have chosen to simply silence it.
Fixes D45594.
llvm-svn: 329976
