Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hans Wennborg
dd1ea8abb7 Inline asm constraints: allow ICE-like pointers for the "n" constraint (PR40890)
Apparently GCC allows this, and there's code relying on it (see bug).

The idea is to allow expression that would have been allowed if they
were cast to int. So I based the code on how such a cast would be done
(the CK_PointerToIntegral case in IntExprEvaluator::VisitCastExpr()).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58821

llvm-svn: 355491
2019-03-06 10:26:19 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger
a9488fbebf Ensure that set constrained asm operands are not affected by truncation.
llvm-svn: 355058
2019-02-28 00:55:09 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger
49ef2a4acd Fix inline assembler constraint validation
The current constraint logic is both too lax and too strict. It fails
for input outside the [INT_MIN..INT_MAX] range, but it also implicitly
accepts 0 as value when it should not. Adjust logic to handle both
correctly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58649

llvm-svn: 354937
2019-02-27 00:40:59 +00:00
Alexey Bataev
91e5860fad [X86, inlineasm] Improve analysis of x,Y0,Yi,Ym,Yt,L,e,Z,s asm constraints (patch by Alexey Frolov)
Improve Sema checking of 9 existing inline asm constraints (‘x’, ‘Y*’, ‘L’, ‘e’, ‘Z’, ‘s’).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10536

llvm-svn: 242665
2015-07-20 12:08:00 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger
a43872ccdd When reporting constraints that should be constant, the type doesn't
really help. Improve diagnostics.

llvm-svn: 226863
2015-01-22 21:01:00 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool
a2823578e6 Sema: analyze I,J,K,M,N,O constraints
Add additional constraint checking for target specific behaviour for inline
assembly constraints.  We would previously silently let all arguments through
for these constraints.  In cases where the constraints were violated, we could
end up failing to select instructions and triggering assertions or worse,
silently ignoring instructions.

llvm-svn: 225244
2015-01-06 04:26:34 +00:00