In preparation for introducing writing capabilities for each of
these classes, I would like to adopt a Foo / FooRef naming
convention, where Foo indicates that the class can manipulate and
serialize Foos, and FooRef indicates that it is an immutable view of
an existing Foo. In other words, Foo is a writer and FooRef is a
reader. This patch names some existing readers to conform to the
FooRef convention, while offering no functional change.
llvm-svn: 301810
Previously parsing of these were all grouped together into a
single master class that could parse any type of debug info
fragment.
With writing forthcoming, the complexity of each individual
fragment is enough to warrant them having their own classes so
that reading and writing of each fragment type can be grouped
together, but isolated from the code for reading and writing
other fragment types.
In doing so, I found a place where parsing code was duplicated
for the FileChecksums fragment, across llvm-readobj and the
CodeView library, and one of the implementations had a bug.
Now that the codepaths are merged, the bug is resolved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32547
llvm-svn: 301557
We have a lot of very similarly named classes related to
dealing with module debug info. This patch has NFC, it just
renames some classes to be more descriptive (albeit slightly
more to type). The mapping from old to new class names is as
follows:
Old | New
ModInfo | DbiModuleDescriptor
ModuleSubstream | ModuleDebugFragment
ModStream | ModuleDebugStream
With the corresponding Builder classes renamed accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32506
llvm-svn: 301555
