The previous names took the shift amount in bits to match gcc and required a multiply by 8 in the header. This creates a misleading error message when we check the range of the immediate to the builtin since the allowed range also got multiplied by 8.
This commit changes the builtins to use a byte shift amount to match the underlying instruction and the Intel intrinsic.
Fixes the remaining issue from PR37795.
llvm-svn: 334773
Summary:
This fixes the ranges for the vcvth family of FP16 intrinsics in the clang front end. Previously it was accepting incorrect ranges
-Changed builtin range checking in SemaChecking
-added tests SemaCheck changes - included in their own file since no similar one exists
-modified existing tests to reflect new ranges
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47592
llvm-svn: 334489
I'm looking into making the select builtins require avx512f, avx512bw, or avx512vl since masking operations generally require those features.
The extract builtins are funny because the 512-bit versions return a 128 or 256 bit vector with masking even when avx512vl is not supported.
llvm-svn: 334330
These builtins are all handled by CGBuiltin.cpp so it doesn't much matter what the immediate type is, but int matches the intrinsic spec.
llvm-svn: 334310
Test changes are due to differences in how we generate undef elements now. We also changed the types used for extractf128_si256/insertf128_si256 to match the signature of the builtin that previously existed which this patch resurrects. This also matches gcc.
llvm-svn: 334261
Adds support for these intrinsics, which are ARM and ARM64 only:
_interlockedbittestandreset_acq
_interlockedbittestandreset_rel
_interlockedbittestandreset_nf
_interlockedbittestandset_acq
_interlockedbittestandset_rel
_interlockedbittestandset_nf
Refactor the bittest intrinsic handling to decompose each intrinsic into
its action, its width, and its atomicity.
llvm-svn: 334239
We still emit shufflevector instructions we just do it from CGBuiltin.cpp now. This ensures the intrinsics that use this are only available on CPUs that support the feature.
I also added range checking to the immediate, but only checked it is 8 bits or smaller. We should maybe be stricter since we never use all 8 bits, but gcc doesn't seem to do that.
llvm-svn: 334237
We still lower them to native shuffle IR, but we do it in CGBuiltin.cpp now. This allows us to check the target feature and ensure the immediate fits in 8 bits.
This also improves our -O0 codegen slightly because we're able to see the zeroinitializer in the shuffle. It looks like it got lost behind a store+load previously.
llvm-svn: 334208
Summary:
We recently switch to using a selects in the intrinsics header files for FMA instructions. But the 512-bit versions support flavors with rounding mode which must be an Integer Constant Expression. This has forced those intrinsics to be implemented as macros. As it stands now the mask and mask3 intrinsics evaluate one of their macro arguments twice. If that argument itself is another intrinsic macro, we can end up over expanding macros. Or if its something we can CSE later it would show up multiple times when it shouldn't.
I tried adding __extension__ around the macro and making it an expression statement and declaring a local variable. But whatever name you choose for the local variable can never be used as the name of an input to the macro in user code. If that happens you would end up with the same name on the LHS and RHS of an assignment after expansion. We might be safe if we use __ in front of the variable names because those names are reserved and user code shouldn't use that, but I wasn't sure I wanted to make that claim.
The other option which I've chosen here, is to add back _mask, _maskz, and _mask3 flavors of the builtin which we will expand in CGBuiltin.cpp to replicate the argument as needed and insert any fneg needed on the third operand to make a subtract. The _maskz isn't truly necessary if we have an unmasked version or if we use the masked version with a -1 mask and wrap a select around it. But I've chosen to make things more uniform.
I separated out the scalar builtin handling to avoid too many things going on in EmitX86FMAExpr. It was different enough due to the extract and insert that the minor duplication of the CreateCall was probably worth it.
Reviewers: tkrupa, RKSimon, spatel, GBuella
Reviewed By: tkrupa
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47724
llvm-svn: 334159
Previously we were just using extended vector operations in the header file.
This unfortunately allowed non-constant indices to be used with the intrinsics. This is incompatible with gcc, icc, and MSVC. It also introduces a different performance characteristic because non-constant index gets lowered to a vector store and an element sized load.
By adding the builtins we can check for the index to be a constant and ensure its in range of the vector element count.
User code still has the option to use extended vector operations themselves if they need non-constant indexing.
llvm-svn: 334057
This patch replaces all packed (and scalar without rounding
mode) fused intrinsics with fmadd/fmaddsub variations.
Then fmadd/fmaddsub are lowered to native IR.
Patch by tkrupa
Reviewers: craig.topper, sroland, spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47444
llvm-svn: 333555
Handling of the third parameter was only checking for *_n and not for the C11 variant, which means that cmpxchg of a 'desired' 0 value was erroneously warning. Handle C11 properly, and add extgensive tests for this as well as NULL pointers in a bunch of places.
Fixes r333246 from D47229.
llvm-svn: 333290
Summary:
As a companion to libc++ patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D47225, mark builtin atomic non-member functions which accept pointers as nonnull.
The atomic non-member functions accept pointers to std::atomic / std::atomic_flag as well as to the non-atomic value. These are all dereferenced unconditionally when lowered, and therefore will fault if null. It's a tiny gotcha for new users, especially when they pass in NULL as expected value (instead of passing a pointer to a NULL value).
<rdar://problem/18473124>
Reviewers: arphaman
Subscribers: aheejin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47229
llvm-svn: 333246
Like other conversion warnings, allow float overflow warnings to be disabled
in known dead paths of template instantiation. This often occurs when a
template template type is a numeric type and the template will check the
range of the numeric type before performing the conversion.
llvm-svn: 332310
These intrinsics work exactly as all other atomic_fetch_* intrinsics and allow to create *atomicrmw* with ordering.
Updated the clang-extensions document.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46386
llvm-svn: 332193
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
As Eli brought up here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46535
I'd previously messed up this fix by missing conversions
that are just slightly outside the range. This patch fixes
this by no longer ignoring the return value of
convertToInteger. Additionally, one of the error messages
wasn't very sensical (mentioning out of range value, when it
really was not), so it was cleaned up as well.
llvm-svn: 331812
As identified and briefly discussed here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37305
Converting a floating point number to an integer type when
the integral part is out of the range of the integer type is
undefined behavior in C. Additionally, CodeGen emits an undef
in this situation.
HOWEVER, we've been giving a warning that says that the value is
changed. This patch corrects the warning to list that it is actually
undefined behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46535
llvm-svn: 331673
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
These builtins can't be handled by the backend on 64-bit targets. So error up front instead of throwing an isel error.
Fixes PR37225
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46132
llvm-svn: 330987
Issue a warning when non-trivial C structs are copied or initialized by
calls to memset, bzero, memcpy, or memmove.
rdar://problem/36124208
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45310
llvm-svn: 330202
The current support of the feature produces only 2 lines in report:
-Some general Code Generation Time;
-Total time of Backend Consumer actions.
This patch extends Clang time report with new lines related to Preprocessor, Include Filea Search, Parsing, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578
llvm-svn: 329684
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
Summary:
Libc++'s default allocator uses `__builtin_operator_new` and `__builtin_operator_delete` in order to allow the calls to new/delete to be ellided. However, libc++ now needs to support over-aligned types in the default allocator. In order to support this without disabling the existing optimization Clang needs to support calling the aligned new overloads from the builtins.
See llvm.org/PR22634 for more information about the libc++ bug.
This patch changes `__builtin_operator_new`/`__builtin_operator_delete` to call any usual `operator new`/`operator delete` function. It does this by performing overload resolution with the arguments passed to the builtin to determine which allocation function to call. If the selected function is not a usual allocation function a diagnostic is issued.
One open issue is if the `align_val_t` overloads should be considered "usual" when `LangOpts::AlignedAllocation` is disabled.
In order to allow libc++ to detect this new behavior the value for `__has_builtin(__builtin_operator_new)` has been updated to `201802`.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington, bogner, ahatanak
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43047
llvm-svn: 328134
The patch fixes a number of bugs related to parameter indexing in
attributes:
* Parameter indices in some attributes (argument_with_type_tag,
pointer_with_type_tag, nonnull, ownership_takes, ownership_holds,
and ownership_returns) are specified in source as one-origin
including any C++ implicit this parameter, were stored as
zero-origin excluding any this parameter, and were erroneously
printing (-ast-print) and confusingly dumping (-ast-dump) as the
stored values.
* For alloc_size, the C++ implicit this parameter was not subtracted
correctly in Sema, leading to assert failures or to silent failures
of __builtin_object_size to compute a value.
* For argument_with_type_tag, pointer_with_type_tag, and
ownership_returns, the C++ implicit this parameter was not added
back to parameter indices in some diagnostics.
This patch fixes the above bugs and aims to prevent similar bugs in
the future by introducing careful mechanisms for handling parameter
indices in attributes. ParamIdx stores a parameter index and is
designed to hide the stored encoding while providing accessors that
require each use (such as printing) to make explicit the encoding that
is needed. Attribute declarations declare parameter index arguments
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument, which are exposed as ParamIdx[*]. This
patch rewrites all attribute arguments that are processed by
checkFunctionOrMethodParameterIndex in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to be declared
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument. The only exception is xray_log_args's
argument, which is encoded as a count not an index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248
llvm-svn: 326602
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
The code for going up the macro arg expansion is duplicated in many
places (and we need it for the analyzer as well, so I did not want to
duplicate it two more times).
This patch is an NFC, so the semantics should remain the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42458
llvm-svn: 324780
typeof expressions
This commit looks through typeof type at the original expression when diagnosing
-Wsign-compare to avoid an unfriendly diagnostic.
rdar://36588828
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42561
llvm-svn: 324514
The 'trivial_abi' attribute can be applied to a C++ class, struct, or
union. It makes special functions of the annotated class (the destructor
and copy/move constructors) to be trivial for the purpose of calls and,
as a result, enables the annotated class or containing classes to be
passed or returned using the C ABI for the underlying type.
When a type that is considered trivial for the purpose of calls despite
having a non-trivial destructor (which happens only when the class type
or one of its subobjects is a 'trivial_abi' class) is passed to a
function, the callee is responsible for destroying the object.
For more background, see the discussions that took place on the mailing
list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/055955.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180101/thread.html#214043
rdar://problem/35204524
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039
llvm-svn: 324269
The constant is already reduced to 8-bits by the time we get here and the checks were just ensuring that it was 8 bits. Thus I don't think there's anyway for them to fail.
llvm-svn: 322244
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
and fold together into a single function.
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
This re-commits r320122 and r320124, minus two changes:
* Comparisons between a constant and a non-constant expression of enumeration
type never warn, not even if the constant is out of range. We should be
warning about the creation of such a constant, not about its use.
* We do not use more precise bit-widths for comparisons against bit-fields.
The more precise diagnostics probably are the right thing, but we should
consider moving them under their own warning flag.
Other than the refactoring, this patch should only change the behavior for the
buggy cases (where the warnings didn't take into account that promotion from
signed to unsigned can leave a range of inaccessible values in the middle of
the promoted type).
llvm-svn: 320211
> Unify implementation of our two different flavours of -Wtautological-compare.
>
> In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
> positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
> for the comparison.
This caused a new warning in Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 64.
I thought we didn't use to warn (with out-of-range-compare) when comparing
against the boundaries of a type?
llvm-svn: 320162
This broke Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 63.
Did this use to fall under the "in-range" case before? I thought we
didn't use to warn when comparing against the boundaries of a type.
llvm-svn: 320133
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
llvm-svn: 320122
This is a follow up of r302131, in which we forgot to add SemaChecking
tests. Adding these tests revealed two problems which have been fixed:
- added missing intrinsic __qdbl,
- properly range checking ssat16 and usat16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40888
llvm-svn: 320019
This is a fix for PR35509 in which we crash because we attempt to compute the
alignment of an incomplete type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40895
llvm-svn: 320017
codepath plus the new "minimum / maximum value of type" diagnostic to get the
same effect.
Move the warning for an in-range but tautological comparison of a constant (0
or 1) against a bool out of -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare into
the more-appropriate -Wtautological-constant-compare.
llvm-svn: 319942
An enumeration with a fixed underlying type can have any value in its
underlying type, not just those spanned by the values of its enumerators.
llvm-svn: 319875
It seems this somehow made -Wempty-body fire in some macro cases where
it didn't before, e.g.
../../third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/bitstream.c(169,5): error: if statement has empty body [-Werror,-Wempty-body]
ff_dlog(NULL, "new table index=%d size=%d\n", table_index, table_size);
^
../../third_party/ffmpeg\libavutil/internal.h(276,80): note: expanded from macro 'ff_dlog'
# define ff_dlog(ctx, ...) do { if (0) av_log(ctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
^
../../third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/bitstream.c(169,5): note: put the
semicolon on a separate line to silence this warning
Reverting until this can be figured out.
> Do not show it when `if` or `else` come from macros.
> E.g.,
>
> #define USED(A) if (A); else
> #define SOME_IF(A) if (A)
>
> void test() {
> // No warnings are shown in those cases now.
> USED(0);
> SOME_IF(0);
> }
>
> Patch by Ilya Biryukov!
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40185
llvm-svn: 318665
Do not show it when `if` or `else` come from macros.
E.g.,
#define USED(A) if (A); else
#define SOME_IF(A) if (A)
void test() {
// No warnings are shown in those cases now.
USED(0);
SOME_IF(0);
}
Patch by Ilya Biryukov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40185
llvm-svn: 318556
Summary:
As Mattias Eriksson has reported in PR35009, in C, for enums, the underlying type should
be used when checking for the tautological comparison, unlike C++, where the enumerator
values define the value range. So if not in CPlusPlus mode, use the enum underlying type.
Also, i have discovered a problem (a crash) when evaluating tautological-ness of the following comparison:
```
enum A { A_a = 0 };
if (a < 0) // expected-warning {{comparison of unsigned enum expression < 0 is always false}}
return 0;
```
This affects both the C and C++, but after the first fix, only C++ code was affected.
That was also fixed, while preserving (i think?) the proper diagnostic output.
And while there, attempt to enhance the test coverage.
Yes, some tests got moved around, sorry about that :)
Fixes PR35009
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rjmccall
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Rakete1111, efriedma, materi, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39122
llvm-svn: 316268
Use the new helper methods to get the underlying type for NSUInteger,
NSInteger types. This avoids spreading the knowledge of the underlying
types in various sites. For non-LLP64 targets, this has no change.
llvm-svn: 316013
The first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx
test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it.
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315875
Summary:
Convert clang::LangAS to a strongly typed enum
Currently both clang AST address spaces and target specific address spaces
are represented as unsigned which can lead to subtle errors if the wrong
type is passed. It is especially confusing in the CodeGen files as it is
not possible to see what kind of address space should be passed to a
function without looking at the implementation.
I originally made this change for our LLVM fork for the CHERI architecture
where we make extensive use of address spaces to differentiate between
capabilities and pointers. When merging the upstream changes I usually
run into some test failures or runtime crashes because the wrong kind of
address space is passed to a function. By converting the LangAS enum to a
C++11 we can catch these errors at compile time. Additionally, it is now
obvious from the function signature which kind of address space it expects.
I found the following errors while writing this patch:
- ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder::LayoutField was passing a clang AST address
space to TargetInfo::getPointer{Width,Align}()
- TypePrinter::printAttributedAfter() prints the numeric value of the
clang AST address space instead of the target address space.
However, this code is not used so I kept the current behaviour
- initializeForBlockHeader() in CGBlocks.cpp was passing
LangAS::opencl_generic to TargetInfo::getPointer{Width,Align}()
- CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockLiteral() was passing a AST address space to
TargetInfo::getPointerWidth()
- CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX::translateParameter() passed a target address space
to Qualifiers::addAddressSpace()
- CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX::getParameterAddress() was using
llvm::Type::getPointerTo() with a AST address space
- clang_getAddressSpace() returns either a LangAS or a target address
space. As this is exposed to C I have kept the current behaviour and
added a comment stating that it is probably not correct.
Other than this the patch should not cause any functional changes.
Reviewers: yaxunl, pcc, bader
Reviewed By: yaxunl, bader
Subscribers: jlebar, jholewinski, nhaehnle, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38816
llvm-svn: 315871
Currently Clang uses default address space (0) to represent private address space for OpenCL
in AST. There are two issues with this:
Multiple address spaces including private address space cannot be diagnosed.
There is no mangling for default address space. For example, if private int* is emitted as
i32 addrspace(5)* in IR. It is supposed to be mangled as PUAS5i but it is mangled as
Pi instead.
This patch attempts to represent OpenCL private address space explicitly in AST. It adds
a new enum LangAS::opencl_private and adds it to the variable types which are implicitly
private:
automatic variables without address space qualifier
function parameter
pointee type without address space qualifier (OpenCL 1.2 and below)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35082
llvm-svn: 315668
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315614
This function is used to perform semantic analysis on Microsoft style
`__va_start`. Rename it to make this more explicit. `__va_start` is
marked as `ALL_MS_LANGUAGES`, and requires Microsoft compatibility.
Other GNU targets will use `__builtin_va_start` instead. NFC.
Addresses post-commit review comments from David Majnemer.
llvm-svn: 314241
The `__va_start` intrinsic for Windows ARM does not account for const
correctness when performing a check. All local qualifiers are ignored
when validating the invocation. This was exposed by building the swift
stdlib against the Windows 10586 SDK for ARM. Simply expand out the
check for the two parameters and ignore the qualifiers for the check.
llvm-svn: 314226
For the triple thumbv7-apple-ios8.0.0 ssize_t is long and size_t is unsigned long,
while NSInteger is int and NSUinteger is unsigned int. Following
https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Strings/Articles/formatSpecifiers.html
Clang catches it and insert a cast to long, for example
printf("%zd", getNSInteger())
will be replaced with
printf("%zd", (long)getNSInteger())
but since the underlying type of ssize_t is long the specifier "%zd" is not getting replaced.
This diff changes this behavior to enable replacing the specifier "%zd" with the correct one.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38159
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 314011
As reported here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34692
A non-defined enum with a backing type was always defaulting to
being treated as a signed type. IN the case where it IS defined,
the signed-ness of the actual items is used.
This patch uses the underlying type's signed-ness in the non-defined
case to test signed-comparision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38145
llvm-svn: 313907
As Aaron Ballman has pointed out, that is not really correct.
So the key problem there is the invalidity of the testcase.
Revert r313747, and rework testcase in such a way, so these
details (platform-specific default enum sigdness) are
accounted for.
Also, add a C++-specific testcase.
llvm-svn: 313756
Hopefully fixes test-clang-msc-x64-on-i686-linux-RA build.
The underlying problem is that the enum is signed there.
Yet still, it is invalid for it to contain negative values,
so the comparison is always tautological in this case.
No differential, but related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313747
Recommit. Original commit was reverted because buildbots broke.
The error was only reproducible in the build with assertions.
The problem was that the diagnostic expected true/false as
bool, while it was provided as string "true"/"false".
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313745
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313677
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
