Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
Summary:
expect() forwards its command to sendline(). This can be problematic if the command already contains a newline: sendline() unconditionally adds a newline to the command, which causes the command to run twice (hitting enter in lldb runs the previous command). The expect() helper looks for the prompt and finds the first one, but because the command has run a second time, the buffer will contain the contents of the second time the command ran, causing potential erroneous matching.
Simplify the editline test, which was using different commands to workaround this misunderstanding.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70324
Summary:
This adds several 5C/5D escape codes that allow moving forward/backward words similar to bash command line navigation.
On my terminal, `ctrl+v ctrl+<left arrow>` prints `^[[1;5D`. However, it seems inputrc also maps other escape variants of this to forward/backward word, so I've included those too. Similar for 5C = ctrl+right arrow.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70137
