The target was marking SIGN_EXTEND as Custom because it wanted to optimize
certain sign-extended shifts. In all other respects the extension is Legal,
so it'd be better to do the optimization in PerformDAGCombine instead.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 203234
Just the simple cases for now. There were a few knock-on changes of
MachineBasicBlock *s to MachineBasicBlock &s. No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 203105
...into (ashr (shl (anyext X), ...), ...), which requires one fewer
instruction. The (anyext X) can sometimes be simplified too.
I didn't do this in DAGCombiner because widening shifts isn't a win
on all targets.
llvm-svn: 199114
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
...namely LOAD AND ADD, LOAD AND AND, LOAD AND OR and LOAD AND EXCLUSIVE OR.
LOAD AND ADD LOGICAL isn't really separately useful for LLVM.
I'll look at adding reusing the CC results in new year.
llvm-svn: 197985
If the extension of a loaded value is compared against zero and used in
other arithmetic, InstCombine will change the comparison to use the
unextended load. It's also possible that the comparison could be against
the unextended load from the outset.
In DAG form this becomes a truncation of an extending load. We want to
strip the truncation if possible so that we can use load-and-test instructions.
llvm-svn: 197804
This originally came about after noticing that InstCombine turns
some of the TMHH (icmp (and...), ...) tests into plain comparisons.
Since there is no instruction to compare with a 64-bit immediate,
TMHH is generally better than an ordered comparison for the cases
that it can handle.
llvm-svn: 197238
This patch makes more use of LPGFR and LNGFR. It builds on top of
the LTGFR selection from r197234. Most of the tests are motivated
by what InstCombine would produce.
llvm-svn: 197236
...in an attempt to rein back the increasingly complex selection code.
A knock-on effect is that ICmpType is exposed from the outset, which
slightly simplifies adjustSubwordCmp.
The code is no piece of art even after this change, but at least it should
be slightly better. No behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 197235
InstCombine turns (sext (trunc)) into (ashr (shl)), then converts any
comparison of the ashr against zero into a comparison of the shl against zero.
This makes sense in itself, but we want to undo it for z, since the sign-
extension instruction has a CC-setting form.
I've included tests for both the original and InstCombined variants,
but the former already worked. The patch fixes the latter.
llvm-svn: 197234
One unusual feature of the z architecture is that the result of a
previous load can be reused indefinitely for subsequent loads, even if
a cache-coherent store to that location is performed by another CPU.
A special serializing instruction must be used if you want to force
a load to be reattempted.
Since volatile loads are not supposed to be omitted in this way,
we should insert a serializing instruction before each such load.
The same goes for atomic loads.
The patch implements this at the IR->DAG boundary, in a similar way
to atomic fences. It is a no-op for targets other than SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 196906
One unusual feature of the z architecture is that the result of a
previous load can be reused indefinitely for subsequent loads, even if
a cache-coherent store to that location is performed by another CPU.
A special serializing instruction must be used if you want to force
a load to be reattempted.
Since volatile loads are not supposed to be omitted in this way,
we should insert a serializing instruction before each such load.
The same goes for atomic loads.
The patch implements this at the IR->DAG boundary, in a similar way
to atomic fences. It is a no-op for targets other than SystemZ.
llvm-svn: 196905
Since z has no setcc instruction as such, the choice of setBooleanContents
is a bit arbitrary. Currently it's set to ZeroOrOneBooleanContent,
so we produced a branch-free form when selecting between 0 and 1,
but not when selecting between 0 and -1. This patch handles the latter
case too.
At some point I'd like to measure whether it's better to use conditional
moves for constant selects on z196, but that's future work.
llvm-svn: 196578
The backend converts 64-bit ORs into subreg moves if the upper 32 bits
of one operand and the low 32 bits of the other are known to be zero.
It then tries to peel away redundant ANDs from the upper 32 bits.
Since AND masks are canonicalized to exclude known-zero bits,
the test ORs the mask and the known-zero bits together before
checking for redundancy. The problem was that it was using the
wrong node when checking for known-zero bits, so could drop ANDs
that were still needed.
llvm-svn: 196267
We previously used the default expansion to SELECT_CC, which in turn would
expand to "LHI; BRC; LHI". In most cases it's better to use an IPM-based
sequence instead.
llvm-svn: 192784
Floats are stored in the high 32 bits of an FPR, and the only GPR<->FPR
transfers are full-register transfers. This patch optimizes GPR<->FPR
float transfers when the high word of a GPR is directly accessible.
llvm-svn: 191764
This just adds the basics necessary for allocating the upper words to
virtual registers (move, load and store). The move support is parameterised
in a way that makes it easy to handle zero extensions, but the associated
zero-extend patterns are added by a later patch.
The easiest way of testing this seemed to be add a new "h" register
constraint for high words. I don't expect the constraint to be useful
in real inline asms, but it should work, so I didn't try to hide it
behind an option.
llvm-svn: 191739
Use subreg_hNN and subreg_lNN for the high and low NN bits of a register.
List the low registers first, so that subreg_l32 also means the low 32
bits of a 128-bit register.
Floats are stored in the upper 32 bits of a 64-bit register, so they
should use subreg_h32 rather than subreg_l32.
No behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 191659
I'm about to add support for high-word operations, so it seemed better
for the low-word registers to have names like R0L rather than R0W.
No behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 191655
The backend previously folded offsets into PC-relative addresses
whereever possible. That's the right thing to do when the address
can be used directly in a PC-relative memory reference (using things
like LRL). But if we have a register-based memory reference and need
to load the PC-relative address separately, it's better to use an anchor
point that could be shared with other accesses to the same area of the
variable.
Fixes a FIXME.
llvm-svn: 191524
Another patch to avoid duplication of encoding information. Things like
NILF, NILL and NILH are used as both 32-bit and 64-bit instructions.
Here the 64-bit versions are defined as aliases of the 32-bit ones.
llvm-svn: 191369
Another patch to reduce the duplication of encoding information.
Rather than define separate patterns for truncating 64-bit stores,
use the 32-bit stores with a subreg. No behavioral changed intended.
llvm-svn: 191365
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
llvm-svn: 190400
The architecture has many comparison instructions, including some that
extend one of the operands. The signed comparison instructions use sign
extensions and the unsigned comparison instructions use zero extensions.
In cases where we had a free choice between signed or unsigned comparisons,
we were trying to decide at lowering time which would best fit the available
instructions, taking things like extension type into account. The code
to do that was getting increasingly hairy and was also making some bad
decisions. E.g. when comparing the result of two LLCs, it is better to use
CR rather than CLR, since CR can be fused with a branch while CLR can't.
This patch removes the lowering code and instead adds an operand to
integer comparisons to say whether signed comparison is required,
whether unsigned comparison is required, or whether either is OK.
We can then leave the choice of instruction up to the normal isel code.
llvm-svn: 190138
For now this just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189819
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189469
Lengths up to a certain threshold (currently 6 * 256) use a series of MVCs.
Lengths above that threshold use a loop to handle X*256 bytes followed
by a single MVC to handle the excess (if any). This loop will also be
needed in future when support for variable lengths is added.
Because the same tablegen classes are used to define MVC and CLC,
the patch also has the side-effect of defining a pseudo loop instruction
for CLC. That instruction isn't used yet (and wouldn't be handled correctly
if it were). I'm planning to use it soon though.
llvm-svn: 189331
