Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teresa Johnson
a61f5e3796 [ThinLTO] Import composite types as declarations
Summary:
When reading the metadata bitcode, create a type declaration when
possible for composite types when we are importing. Doing this in
the bitcode reader saves memory. Also it works naturally in the case
when the type ODR map contains a definition for the same composite type
because it was used in the importing module (buildODRType will
automatically use the existing definition and not create a type
declaration).

For Chromium built with -g2, this reduces the aggregate size of the
generated native object files by 66% (from 31G to 10G). It reduced
the time through the ThinLTO link and backend phases by about 20% on
my machine.

Reviewers: mehdi_amini, dblaikie, aprantl

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27775

llvm-svn: 289993
2016-12-16 21:25:01 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
73ec065604 Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982
2016-12-16 19:39:01 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
8662305bae Strip invalid TBAA when reading bitcode
This ensures backward compatibility on bitcode loading.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27839

llvm-svn: 289977
2016-12-16 19:16:29 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
74a835cda0 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920
2016-12-16 04:25:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
03c6d31a3b Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906
2016-12-16 01:00:30 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
ce13935776 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902
2016-12-16 00:36:43 +00:00
Nico Weber
b3901bdde8 Fix MSVC build after 289461; MSVC isn't sure if this is std:: or llvm::
llvm-svn: 289480
2016-12-12 22:46:40 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
ef27db879c Refactor BitcodeReader: move Metadata and ValueId handling in their own class/file
Summary:
I'm planning on changing the way we load metadata to enable laziness.
I'm getting lost in this gigantic files, and gigantic class that is the bitcode
reader. This is a first toward splitting it in a few coarse components that
are more easily understandable.

Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson

Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27646

llvm-svn: 289461
2016-12-12 19:34:26 +00:00