Summary:
This was causing problems on linux, where we'd end up calling the
deleting destructor instead of a regular one (because they have the same
demangled name), making a lot of mischief in the process.
The only place where this was necessary (according to the test suite, at
least) was to call a base structor instead of a complete one, but this
is now handled in a more targeted fashion.
TestCallOverriddenMethod is now re-enabled as it now passes reliably.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70722
The function call and the constructor call fail now several Linux
bots (Swift CI, my own bot and Stella's Debian system), so let's disable
the relevant test parts until we can figure out why it is failing.
We call these tests in the second test function where they are
x-failed on Windows. I forgot to remove the tests from the first
test function (which is not x-failed on Windows) when extracting these
calls into their own test function, so the test is still failing on Windows.
llvm-svn: 375271
These tests were testing a bug related to constructors. It seems that
on Windows the expression command can't construct objects (or at least,
call their constructor explicitly which is required for the tests), so
this is just x-failing them until Windows actually supports constructor calls.
llvm-svn: 375173
Summary:
When we have a artificial constructor DIE, we currently create from that a global function with the name of that class.
That ends up causing a bunch of funny errors such as "must use 'struct' tag to refer to type 'Foo' in this scope" when
doing `Foo f`. Also causes that constructing a class via `Foo()` actually just calls that global function.
The fix is that when we have an artificial method decl, we always treat it as handled even if we don't create a CXXMethodDecl
for it (which we never do for artificial methods at the moment).
Fixes rdar://55757491 and probably some other radars.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, shafik
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jingham, shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68130
llvm-svn: 375151
The test is now passing, so remove the expected failure. No other tests associated with the bug are passing, though, so only remove expected failure from this one test
llvm-svn: 372634
Summary:
Instead of each test case knowing its depth relative to the test root,
we can just have dotest add the folder containing Makefile.rules to the
include path.
This was motivated by r370616, though I have been wanting to do this
ever since we moved to building tests out-of-tree.
The only manually modified files in this patch are lldbinline.py and
plugins/builder_base.py. The rest of the patch has been produced by this
shell command:
find . \( -name Makefile -o -name '*.mk' \) -exec sed --in-place -e '/LEVEL *:\?=/d' -e '1,2{/^$/d}' -e 's,\$(LEVEL)/,,' {} +
Reviewers: teemperor, aprantl, espindola, jfb
Subscribers: emaste, javed.absar, arichardson, christof, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67083
llvm-svn: 370845
Summary:
As discussed on lldb-dev, this patch moves some LLDB tests into a hierarchy that more closely
resembles the commands we use in the LLDB interpreter. This patch should only move tests
that use the command interpreter and shouldn't touch any tests that primarily test the SB API.
Reviewers: #lldb, jfb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67033
llvm-svn: 370605
