The fix is that ExprEvaluatorBase::VisitInitListExpr should handle transparent exprs instead of exprs with one element. Fixing that uncovers one testcase failure because the AST for "constexpr _Complex float test2 = {1};" is wrong (the _Complex prvalue should not be const-qualified), and a number of test failures in test/OpenMP where the captured stmt contains an InitListExpr that is in syntactic form.
llvm-svn: 301891
CheckForIntOverflow used to implement a whitelist of top-level expressions to
send to the constant expression evaluator, which handled many more expressions
than the CheckForIntOverflow whitelist did.
llvm-svn: 301742
Add a triple to the run lines so that integers will the same sizes across runs.
Also add a compile time check to ensure the assumptions about sizes are met.
llvm-svn: 265991
r257357 fixed clang to warn on integer overflow in struct initializers.
However, it didn't warn when a struct had a nested initializer. This
commit makes changes in Sema::CheckForIntOverflow to handle nested
initializers.
For example:
struct s {
struct t {
unsigned x;
} t;
} s = {
{
.x = 4 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024
}
};
rdar://problem/23526454
llvm-svn: 260360
variables in C, in the cases where we can constant-fold it to a value
regardless (such as floating-point division by zero and signed integer
overflow). Strictly enforcing this rule breaks too much code.
llvm-svn: 254992
side-effect, so that we don't allow speculative evaluation of such expressions
during code generation.
This caused a diagnostic quality regression, so fix constant expression
diagnostics to prefer either the first "can't be constant folded" diagnostic or
the first "not a constant expression" diagnostic depending on the kind of
evaluation we're doing. This was always the intent, but didn't quite work
correctly before.
This results in certain initializers that used to be constant initializers to
no longer be; in particular, things like:
float f = 1e100;
are no longer accepted in C. This seems appropriate, as such constructs would
lead to code being executed if sanitizers are enabled.
llvm-svn: 254574
When visiting AssignmentOps, keep evaluating after a failure (when possible) in
order to identify overflow in subexpressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D1238
llvm-svn: 228202
