Summary:
The fix added in r352904 is not quite correct, or rather misleading:
1. When the texfailctrl (TFC) argument was non-constant, the fix assumed
non-TFE/LWE, which is incorrect.
2. Regardless, this code path cannot even be hit for correct
TFE/LWE-enabled calls, because those return a struct. Added
a test case for those for completeness.
Change-Id: I92d314dbc67a2670f6d7adaab765ef45f56a49cf
Reviewers: hliao, dstuttard, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57681
llvm-svn: 353097
GEPs can produce either scalar or vector results. If we're extracting only a subset of the vector lanes, simplifying the operands is helpful in eliminating redundant computation, and (eventually) allowing further optimizations
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57177
llvm-svn: 352440
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
TFE and LWE support requires extra result registers that are written in the
event of a failure in order to detect that failure case.
The specific use-case that initiated these changes is sparse texture support.
This means that if image intrinsics are used with either option turned on, the
programmer must ensure that the return type can contain all of the expected
results. This can result in redundant registers since the vector size must be a
power-of-2.
This change takes roughly 6 parts:
1. Modify the instruction defs in tablegen to add new instruction variants that
can accomodate the extra return values.
2. Updates to lowerImage in SIISelLowering.cpp to accomodate setting TFE or LWE
(where the bulk of the work for these instruction types is now done)
3. Extra verification code to catch cases where intrinsics have been used but
insufficient return registers are used.
4. Modification to the adjustWritemask optimisation to account for TFE/LWE being
enabled (requires extra registers to be maintained for error return value).
5. An extra pass to zero initialize the error value return - this is because if
the error does not occur, the register is not written and thus must be zeroed
before use. Also added a new (on by default) option to ensure ALL return values
are zero-initialized that is required for sparse texture support.
6. Disable the inst_combine optimization in the presence of tfe/lwe (later TODO
for this to re-enable and handle correctly).
There's an additional fix now to avoid a dmask=0
For an image intrinsic with tfe where all result channels except tfe
were unused, I was getting an image instruction with dmask=0 and only a
single vgpr result for tfe. That is incorrect because the hardware
assumes there is at least one vgpr result, plus the one for tfe.
Fixed by forcing dmask to 1, which gives the desired two vgpr result
with tfe in the second one.
The TFE or LWE result is returned from the intrinsics using an aggregate
type. Look in the test code provided to see how this works, but in essence IR
code to invoke the intrinsic looks as follows:
%v = call {<4 x float>,i32} @llvm.amdgcn.image.load.1d.v4f32i32.i32(i32 15,
i32 %s, <8 x i32> %rsrc, i32 1, i32 0)
%v.vec = extractvalue {<4 x float>, i32} %v, 0
%v.err = extractvalue {<4 x float>, i32} %v, 1
This re-submit of the change also includes a slight modification in
SIISelLowering.cpp to work-around a compiler bug for the powerpc_le
platform that caused a buildbot failure on a previous submission.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48826
Change-Id: If222bc03642e76cf98059a6bef5d5bffeda38dda
Work around for ppcle compiler bug
Change-Id: Ie284cf24b2271215be1b9dc95b485fd15000e32b
llvm-svn: 351054
Also revert fix r347876
One of the buildbots was reporting a failure in some relevant tests that I can't
repro or explain at present, so reverting until I can isolate.
llvm-svn: 347911
TFE and LWE support requires extra result registers that are written in the
event of a failure in order to detect that failure case.
The specific use-case that initiated these changes is sparse texture support.
This means that if image intrinsics are used with either option turned on, the
programmer must ensure that the return type can contain all of the expected
results. This can result in redundant registers since the vector size must be a
power-of-2.
This change takes roughly 6 parts:
1. Modify the instruction defs in tablegen to add new instruction variants that
can accomodate the extra return values.
2. Updates to lowerImage in SIISelLowering.cpp to accomodate setting TFE or LWE
(where the bulk of the work for these instruction types is now done)
3. Extra verification code to catch cases where intrinsics have been used but
insufficient return registers are used.
4. Modification to the adjustWritemask optimisation to account for TFE/LWE being
enabled (requires extra registers to be maintained for error return value).
5. An extra pass to zero initialize the error value return - this is because if
the error does not occur, the register is not written and thus must be zeroed
before use. Also added a new (on by default) option to ensure ALL return values
are zero-initialized that is required for sparse texture support.
6. Disable the inst_combine optimization in the presence of tfe/lwe (later TODO
for this to re-enable and handle correctly).
There's an additional fix now to avoid a dmask=0
For an image intrinsic with tfe where all result channels except tfe
were unused, I was getting an image instruction with dmask=0 and only a
single vgpr result for tfe. That is incorrect because the hardware
assumes there is at least one vgpr result, plus the one for tfe.
Fixed by forcing dmask to 1, which gives the desired two vgpr result
with tfe in the second one.
The TFE or LWE result is returned from the intrinsics using an aggregate
type. Look in the test code provided to see how this works, but in essence IR
code to invoke the intrinsic looks as follows:
%v = call {<4 x float>,i32} @llvm.amdgcn.image.load.1d.v4f32i32.i32(i32 15,
i32 %s, <8 x i32> %rsrc, i32 1, i32 0)
%v.vec = extractvalue {<4 x float>, i32} %v, 0
%v.err = extractvalue {<4 x float>, i32} %v, 1
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48826
Change-Id: If222bc03642e76cf98059a6bef5d5bffeda38dda
llvm-svn: 347871
Support funnel shifts in InstCombine demanded bits simplification.
If the shift amount is constant, we can determine both the demanded
bits of the operands, as well as the known bits of the result.
If one of the operands has no demanded bits, it will be replaced
by undef and the funnel shift will be simplified into a simple shift
due to the simplifications added in D54778.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54869
llvm-svn: 347515
This is the umin alternative to the umax code from rL344237. We use
DeMorgans law on the umax case to bring us to the same thing on umin,
but using countLeadingOnes, not countLeadingZeros.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53036
llvm-svn: 344239
Use the demanded bits of umax(A,C) to prove we can just use A so long as the
lowest non-zero bit of DemandMask is higher than the highest non-zero bit of C
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53033
llvm-svn: 344237
We established the (unfortunately complicated) rules for UB/poison
propagation with vector ops in:
D48893
D48987
D49047
It's clear from the affected tests that we are potentially creating
poison where none existed before the transforms. For add/sub/mul,
the answer is simple: just drop the flags because the extra undef
vector lanes are generally more valuable for analysis and codegen.
llvm-svn: 343819
We're a long way from D50992 and D51553, but this is where we have to start.
We weren't back-propagating undefs into binop constant values for anything but
add/sub/mul/and/or/xor.
This is likely because we have to be careful about not introducing UB/poison
with div/rem/shift. But I suspect we already are getting the poison part wrong
for add/sub/mul (although it may not be possible to expose the bug currently
because we use SimplifyDemandedVectorElts from a limited set of opcodes).
See the discussion/implementation from D48987 and D49047.
This patch just enables functionality for FP ops because those do not have
UB/poison potential.
llvm-svn: 343727
I noticed that we were not back-propagating undef lanes to shuffle masks when we have a
shuffle that reduces the vector width. This is part of investigating/solving PR38691:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38691
The DAG equivalent was proposed with:
D51696
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51433
llvm-svn: 341981
I'm preparing to add the same functionality both here and to the DAG
version of this code in D51696 / D51433, so try to make those cases
as similar as possible to avoid bugs.
llvm-svn: 341545
This converts them to what clang is now using for codegen. Unfortunately, there seem to be a few kinks to work out still. I'll try to address with follow up patches.
llvm-svn: 336871
Summary:
This also removes the need for atomic pseudo instructions, since
we select the correct encoding directly in SITargetLowering::lowerImage
for dimension-aware image intrinsics.
Mesa uses dimension-aware image intrinsics since
commit a9a7993441.
Change-Id: I7473d20009476a4ed6d919cae4e6dca9ff42e77a
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, mareko, tpr, b-sumner
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48167
llvm-svn: 335231
Summary:
Use the expanded features of the TableGen generic tables to avoid manually
adding the combinatorially exploded set of intrinsics. The
getAMDGPUImageDimIntrinsic lookup function is early-out,
i.e. non-AMDGPU intrinsics will never look at the underlying table.
Use a generic approach for getting the new intrinsic overload to keep the
code simple, and make the image dmask handling more generic:
- handle non-sampler image loads
- handle the case where the set of demanded elements is not a prefix
There is some overlap between this code and an optimization that happens
in the backend during code generation. They currently complement each other:
- only the codegen optimization can generate vec3 loads
- only the InstCombine optimization can handle D16
The InstCombine optimization also likely covers more cases since the
codegen optimization is fairly ad-hoc. Ideally, we'll remove the optimization
in codegen once the infrastructure for vec3 is in place (which will probably
take a long time).
Modify the test cases to use dimension-aware intrinsics. This makes it
easier to see that the test coverage for the new intrinsics is equivalent,
and the old style intrinsics will be removed in a follow-up commit anyway.
Change-Id: I4b91ea661413d13004956fe4ef7d13d41b8ce3ad
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, majnemer
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, mgorny, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48165
llvm-svn: 335230
Put in a conservatively correct estimate for now. Avoids miscompiling
clang in FDO mode. This is really tricky to trigger in reality as
basically all interesting cases will be folded away by computeKnownBits
earlier, I was unable to find a reasonably small test case.
llvm-svn: 331975
This is safe as long as the udiv is not exact. The pattern is not common in
C++ code, but comes up all the time in code generated by XLA's GPU backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46647
llvm-svn: 331933
This completes the work started in r329604 and r329605 when we changed clang to no longer use the intrinsics.
We lost some InstCombine SimplifyDemandedBit optimizations through this change as we aren't able to fold 'and', bitcast, shuffle very well.
llvm-svn: 329990
I was comparing the demanded-bits implementations between InstCombine
and TargetLowering as part of investigating questions in D42088 and
noticed that this was wrong in IR. We were losing all of the prior
known bits when we got back to the 'zext'.
llvm-svn: 322662
Recurse instead of returning on the first found optimization. Also, return early in the caller
instead of continuing because that allows another round of simplification before we might
potentially lose undef information from a shuffle mask by eliminating the shuffle.
As noted in the review, we could probably do better and be more efficient by moving all of
demanded elements into a separate pass, but this is yet another quick fix to instcombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37236
llvm-svn: 312248
Just create an all 1s demanded mask and continue recursing like normal. The recursive calls should be able to handle an all 1s mask and do the right thing.
The only time we should care about knowing whether the upper bit was demanded is when we need to know if we should clear the NSW/NUW flags.
Now that we have a consistent path through the code for all cases, use KnownBits::computeForAddSub to compute the known bits at the end since we already have the LHS and RHS.
My larger goal here is to move the code that turns add into xor if only 1 bit is demanded and no bits below it are non-zero from InstCombiner::OptAndOp to here. This will allow it to be more general instead of just looking for 'add' and 'and' with constant RHS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36486
llvm-svn: 311789
There are cases where AShr have better chance to be optimized than LShr, especially when the demanded bits are not known to be Zero, and also known to be similar to the sign bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36936
llvm-svn: 311773
Summary:
As far as I can tell the earlier call getLimitedValue will guaranteed ShiftAmt is saturated to BitWidth-1 preventing it from ever being equal or greater than BitWidth.
At one point in the past the getLimitedValue call was only passed BitWidth not BitWidth - 1. This would have allowed the equality case to get here. And in fact this check was initially added as just BitWidth == ShiftAmt, but was changed shortly after to include > which should have never been possible.
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36123
llvm-svn: 309690
Previously the InstCombiner class contained a pointer to an IR builder that had been passed to the constructor. Sometimes this would be passed to helper functions as either a pointer or the pointer would be dereferenced to be passed by reference.
This patch makes it a reference everywhere including the InstCombiner class itself so there is more inconsistency. This a large, but mechanical patch. I've done very minimal formatting changes on it despite what clang-format wanted to do.
llvm-svn: 307451
Going through the Constant methods requires redetermining that the Constant is a ConstantInt and then calling isZero/isOne/isMinusOne.
llvm-svn: 307292
While there avoid resizing the DemandedMask twice. Make a copy into a separate variable instead. This potentially removes an allocation on large bit widths.
With the use of the zextOrTrunc methods on APInt and KnownBits these can be made almost source identical. The only difference is the zero of the upper bits for ZExt. This is similar to how its done in computeKnownBits in ValueTracking.
llvm-svn: 303791
The current code created a NewBits mask and used it as a mask several times. One of them just before a call to trunc making it unnecessary. A call to getActiveBits can get us the same information for the case. We also ORed with this mask later when we should have just sign extended the known bits.
We also called trunc on the guaranteed to be zero KnownZeros/Ones masks entering this code. Creating appropriately sized temporary APInts is probably better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32098
llvm-svn: 303779
This patch adds min/max population count, leading/trailing zero/one bit counting methods.
The min methods return answers based on bits that are known without considering unknown bits. The max methods give answers taking into account the largest count that unknown bits could give.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32931
llvm-svn: 302925
This adds routines for reseting KnownBits to unknown, making the value all zeros or all ones. It also adds methods for querying if the value is zero, all ones or unknown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32637
llvm-svn: 302262
This patch adds zext, sext, and trunc methods to KnownBits and uses them where possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32784
llvm-svn: 302088
Summary: This patch adds isNegative, isNonNegative for querying whether the sign bit is known. It also adds makeNegative and makeNonNegative for controlling the sign bit.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, davide
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32651
llvm-svn: 301747
This patch introduces a new KnownBits struct that wraps the two APInt used by computeKnownBits. This allows us to treat them as more of a unit.
Initially I've just altered the signatures of computeKnownBits and InstCombine's simplifyDemandedBits to pass a KnownBits reference instead of two separate APInt references. I'll do similar to the SelectionDAG version of computeKnownBits/simplifyDemandedBits as a separate patch.
I've added a constructor that allows initializing both APInts to the same bit width with a starting value of 0. This reduces the repeated pattern of initializing both APInts. Once place default constructed the APInts so I added a default constructor for those cases.
Going forward I would like to add more methods that will work on the pairs. For example trunc, zext, and sext occur on both APInts together in several places. We should probably add a clear method that can be used to clear both pieces. Maybe a method to check for conflicting information. A method to return (Zero|One) so we don't write it out everywhere. Maybe a method for (Zero|One).isAllOnesValue() to determine if all bits are known. I'm sure there are many other methods we can come up with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32376
llvm-svn: 301432
