init list formatting. This suggestion has now gone into the LLVM coding
standards, and is particularly relevant now that we're using C++11.
Updated a really ridiculous number of tests to reflect this change.
llvm-svn: 202637
Generally people seem to prefer wrapping the first function parameter
over wrapping the trailing tokens "const", "override" and "final". This
does not extend to function-like annotations and probably not to other
non-standard annotations.
Before:
void someLongFunction(int SomeLongParameter)
const { ... }
After:
void someLongFunction(
int SomeLongParameter) const { ... }
llvm-svn: 201504
Before:
auto result = SomeObject
// Calling someFunction on SomeObject
.someFunction();
After:
auto result = SomeObject
// Calling someFunction on SomeObject
.someFunction();
llvm-svn: 201138
It seems like most people see unary operators more like part of the
subsequent identifier and find relative indentation odd.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaa));
After:
aaaaaaaaaa(!aaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaa));
llvm-svn: 200840
Before:
typedef NS_ENUM(NSInteger, MyType) {
/// Information about someDecentlyLongValue.
someDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about anotherDecentlyLongValue.
anotherDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about aThirdDecentlyLongValue.
aThirdDecentlyLongValue};
After:
typedef NS_ENUM(NSInteger, MyType) {
/// Information about someDecentlyLongValue.
someDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about anotherDecentlyLongValue.
anotherDecentlyLongValue,
/// Information about aThirdDecentlyLongValue.
aThirdDecentlyLongValue
};
llvm-svn: 200469
Mozilla and WebKit seem to use a space after @property (verified by
grepping their codebases) so we turn this on there as well.
Change by Christian Legnitto. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 200320
This was done when we were not able to parse lambdas to handle some
edge cases for block formatting different in return statements, but is
not necessary any more.
llvm-svn: 199982
Before:
std::unique_ptr<int[]> foo() {}
After:
std::unique_ptr<int []> foo() {}
Also, the formatting could go severely wrong after such a function
before.
llvm-svn: 199817
The author might be missing the "#" or these might be protocol buffer
definitions. Either way, we should not break the line or the string.
There don't seem to be other valid use cases.
llvm-svn: 199501
We cannot simply change the start column to accomodate for the @ in an
ObjC string literal as that will make clang-format happily violate the
column limit.
Use a different workaround instead. However, a better long-term
solution might be to join the @ and the rest of the literal into a
single token.
llvm-svn: 199198
Before:
SomeThing // break
.SomeFunction( // break
param);
After:
SomeThing // break
.SomeFunction( // break
param);
Seems to be more common in editors and codebases I have looked at.
llvm-svn: 199105
Before:
SomeMap[std::pair(aaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb)]
.insert(ccccccccccccccccccccccc);
After:
SomeMap[std::pair(aaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb)].insert(
ccccccccccccccccccccccc);
This seems to be about 3:1 more common in Google and Chromium style and I found
only a handful of instances inside the LLVM codebase.
llvm-svn: 198924
While it is allowed to not have an @ on subsequent lines, it seems
general practice to add them. If undesired, the code author can easily
remove them again and clang-format won't re-add them.
llvm-svn: 198871
Before:
#pragma mark Any non - hyphenated or hyphenated string(including parentheses).
After:
#pragma mark Any non-hyphenated or hyphenated string (including parentheses).
llvm-svn: 198870
- Format a braced list with one element per line if it has nested
braced lists.
- Use a column layout only when the list has 6+ elements (instead of the
current 4+ elements).
llvm-svn: 198869
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Before:
enum ShortEnum {
A,
B,
C
};
After:
enum ShortEnum { A, B, C };
This seems to be the predominant choice in LLVM/Clang as well as in
Google style.
llvm-svn: 198558
A comment following the "{" of a braced list seems to almost always
refer to the first element of the list and thus should be aligned
to it.
Before (with Cpp11 braced list style):
SomeFunction({ // Comment 1
"first entry",
// Comment 2
"second entry"});
After:
SomeFunction({// Comment 1
"first entry",
// Comment 2
"second entry"});
llvm-svn: 197725
Unexpectedly, it seems that people commonly know what they were doing
when writing a comment.
Also, being more conservative about comment breaking has the advantage
of giving more flexibility. If a linebreak within the comment can
improve formatting, the author can add it (after which clang-format
won't undo it). There is no way to override clang-format's behavior if
it breaks a comment.
llvm-svn: 197698
Before:
aaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
aaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
After:
aaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
aaaaaaaaaa = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
Probably still not ideal, but should be a step into the right direction.
llvm-svn: 197557
Formatting this:
void f() { // 1 space initial indent.
int i;
#define A \
int i; \
int j;
int k; // Format this line.
}
void f() {
#define A 1 // Format this line.
}
Before:
void f() { // 1 space initial indent.
int i;
#define A \
int i; \
int j;
int k; // Format this line.
}
void f() {
#define A 1 // Format this line.
}
After:
void f() { // 1 space initial indent.
int i;
#define A \
int i; \
int j;
int k; // Format this line.
}
void f() {
#define A 1 // Format this line.
}
llvm-svn: 197494
