Summary:
- Fix test jump for powerpc64le
Jumping directly to the return line on power architecture dos not means
returning the value that is seen on the code. The last test fails, because
it needs the execution of some assembly in the beginning of the function.
Avoiding this test for this architecture.
- Avoid evaluate environ variable name on Linux
On Linux the Symbol environ conflicts with another variable, then in
order to avoid it, this test was moved into a specific test, which is not
supported if the OS is Linux.
- Added PPC64le as MIPS behavior
Checking the disassembler output, on PPC64le machines behaves as MPIS.
Added method to identify PPC64le architecture and checking it when
disassembling instructions in the test case.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: clayborg, labath, luporl, alexandreyy, sdardis, ki.stfu, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44101
Patch by Leonardo Bianconi <leonardo.bianconi@eldorado.org.br>.
llvm-svn: 327977
These tests fail with a relatively frequently on Darwin machines with
errors such as:
File ".../lldb/third_party/Python/module/pexpect-2.4/pexpect.py", line 1444, in expect_loop
raise EOF(str(e) + '\n' + str(self))
EOF: End Of File (EOF) in read_nonblocking(). Empty string style platform.
The unpredictable failures make these tests noisy.
rdar://37046976
llvm-svn: 326739
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these tests, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without
any errors or failures.
I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches
to address this. arm64 looks good.
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 314132
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without
any errors or failures.
I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches
to address this. arm64 looks good.
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 314038
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point.
There will be some smaller follow-on patches. The changes to tools/lldb-server are
verbose and I'm not thrilled with having to skip all of these tests manually.
There are a few places where I'm making the assumption that "armv7", "armv7k", "arm64"
means it's an ios device, and I need to review & clean these up with an OS check
as well. (Android will show up as "arm" and "aarch64" so by pure luck they shouldn't
cause problems, but it's not an assumption I want to rely on).
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 313932
Summary:
Test was skipped because -data-evaluate-expression was thought
to not work on globals. This is not the case - the issue was clang
removes debug info for globals in cpp files that are not used.
Add a reference to the globals in question, and fix memory patter in
test to match memory pattern in testcase.
Reviewers: ki.stfu, abidh
Reviewed By: ki.stfu
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37533
llvm-svn: 312726
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in
to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like
`import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces
a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when
unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached
from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports
it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test
does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of
the same package.
The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead
of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import
lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar
cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path
to ensure that this can't happen again.
llvm-svn: 251886
Summary:
As per the following link, the "--" separator can appear between the options
and parameters of any MI command. Previously this separator was only
handled by the `-data-disassemble` MI command. I have moved the relevant
code into `CMICmdBase` so that any MI command can handle the
aforementioned separator.
https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/GDB_002fMI-Input-Syntax.html#GDB_002fMI-Input-Syntax
Reviewers: ki.stfu
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14197
llvm-svn: 251793
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
