Gericom/teak-llvm
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Gericom/teak-llvm.git synced 2025-06-24 14:05:49 -04:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
306,812 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags 875 MiB
81fe1fbf4a
Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Haojian Wu
cd5e59f552 [Tooling] Add "-filter" option to AllTUsExecution 
Summary: We can run the tools on a subset files of compilation database.

Reviewers: ioeric

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54092

llvm-svn: 346131
 2018-11-05 13:42:05 +00:00
Ilya Biryukov
dbdd8e5238 [Tooling] Add a isSingleProcess() helper to ToolExecutor 
Summary:
Used in clangd's symbol builder to optimize for the common
shared-memory executor case.

Reviewers: ioeric

Reviewed By: ioeric

Subscribers: kadircet, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51164

llvm-svn: 340599
 2018-08-24 09:03:29 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
497fd98af2 Revert "[Tooling] [0/1] Refactor FrontendActionFactory::create() to return std::unique_ptr<>" 
This reverts commit rL326201

This broke gcc4.8 builds, compiler just segfaults:¬
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/builds/14909¬
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-abi-test/builds/22673¬

llvm-svn: 326204
 2018-02-27 15:54:55 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
6017bf4f31 [Tooling] [0/1] Refactor FrontendActionFactory::create() to return std::unique_ptr<> 
Summary:
Noticed during review of D41102.

I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.

I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.

This is clang part.
Clang-tools-extra part is D43780.

Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc

Reviewed By: alexfh

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779

llvm-svn: 326201
 2018-02-27 15:19:20 +00:00
Eric Liu
2a27ebe670 [Tooling] Test more APIs of ToolExecutor. NFC. 
llvm-svn: 323517
 2018-01-26 11:10:32 +00:00
Eric Liu
e25f3676b0 Add a tool executor that runs actions on all TUs in the compilation database. 
Summary: Tool results are deduplicated by the result key.

Reviewers: hokein

Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41729

llvm-svn: 321864
 2018-01-05 10:32:16 +00:00
Eric Liu
190afe955c [Tooling] Test internal::createExecutorFromCommandLineArgsImpl instead of the wrapper. 
llvm-svn: 317466
 2017-11-06 09:29:09 +00:00
Eric Liu
152ad05050 [Tooling] Fix linking of StandaloneToolExecutorPlugin. 
llvm-svn: 317332
 2017-11-03 15:57:27 +00:00
Eric Liu
83454aaec4 Try to fix warnings and windows test failures caused by r316653 
llvm-svn: 316661
 2017-10-26 13:09:50 +00:00
Eric Liu
826b783214 [Tooling] A new framework for executing clang frontend actions. 
Summary:
This defines a `clang::tooling::ToolExecutor` interface that can be extended to support different execution plans including standalone execution on a given set of TUs or parallel execution on all TUs in a codebase.

In order to enable multiprocessing execution, tool actions are expected to output result into a `ToolResults` interface provided by executors. The `ToolResults` interface abstracts how results are stored e.g. in-memory for standalone executions or on-disk for large-scale execution.

New executors can be registered as `ToolExecutorPlugin`s via the `ToolExecutorPluginRegistry`. CLI tools can use `createExecutorFromCommandLineArgs` to create a specific registered executor according to the command-line arguments.

This patch also implements `StandaloneToolExecutor` which has the same behavior as the current `ClangTool` interface, i.e. execute frontend actions on a given set of TUs. At this point, it's simply a wrapper around `ClangTool` at this point.

This is still experimental but expected to replace the existing `ClangTool` interface so that specific tools would not need to worry about execution.

Reviewers: klimek, arphaman, hokein, sammccall

Reviewed By: klimek

Subscribers: cfe-commits, djasper, mgorny, omtcyfz

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34272

llvm-svn: 316653
 2017-10-26 10:38:14 +00:00