The current support of the feature produces only 2 lines in report:
-Some general Code Generation Time;
-Total time of Backend Consumer actions.
This patch extends Clang time report with new lines related to Preprocessor, Include Filea Search, Parsing, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578
llvm-svn: 329684
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
Summary:
Libc++'s default allocator uses `__builtin_operator_new` and `__builtin_operator_delete` in order to allow the calls to new/delete to be ellided. However, libc++ now needs to support over-aligned types in the default allocator. In order to support this without disabling the existing optimization Clang needs to support calling the aligned new overloads from the builtins.
See llvm.org/PR22634 for more information about the libc++ bug.
This patch changes `__builtin_operator_new`/`__builtin_operator_delete` to call any usual `operator new`/`operator delete` function. It does this by performing overload resolution with the arguments passed to the builtin to determine which allocation function to call. If the selected function is not a usual allocation function a diagnostic is issued.
One open issue is if the `align_val_t` overloads should be considered "usual" when `LangOpts::AlignedAllocation` is disabled.
In order to allow libc++ to detect this new behavior the value for `__has_builtin(__builtin_operator_new)` has been updated to `201802`.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington, bogner, ahatanak
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43047
llvm-svn: 328134
The patch fixes a number of bugs related to parameter indexing in
attributes:
* Parameter indices in some attributes (argument_with_type_tag,
pointer_with_type_tag, nonnull, ownership_takes, ownership_holds,
and ownership_returns) are specified in source as one-origin
including any C++ implicit this parameter, were stored as
zero-origin excluding any this parameter, and were erroneously
printing (-ast-print) and confusingly dumping (-ast-dump) as the
stored values.
* For alloc_size, the C++ implicit this parameter was not subtracted
correctly in Sema, leading to assert failures or to silent failures
of __builtin_object_size to compute a value.
* For argument_with_type_tag, pointer_with_type_tag, and
ownership_returns, the C++ implicit this parameter was not added
back to parameter indices in some diagnostics.
This patch fixes the above bugs and aims to prevent similar bugs in
the future by introducing careful mechanisms for handling parameter
indices in attributes. ParamIdx stores a parameter index and is
designed to hide the stored encoding while providing accessors that
require each use (such as printing) to make explicit the encoding that
is needed. Attribute declarations declare parameter index arguments
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument, which are exposed as ParamIdx[*]. This
patch rewrites all attribute arguments that are processed by
checkFunctionOrMethodParameterIndex in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to be declared
as [Variadic]ParamIdxArgument. The only exception is xray_log_args's
argument, which is encoded as a count not an index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43248
llvm-svn: 326602
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
The code for going up the macro arg expansion is duplicated in many
places (and we need it for the analyzer as well, so I did not want to
duplicate it two more times).
This patch is an NFC, so the semantics should remain the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42458
llvm-svn: 324780
typeof expressions
This commit looks through typeof type at the original expression when diagnosing
-Wsign-compare to avoid an unfriendly diagnostic.
rdar://36588828
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42561
llvm-svn: 324514
The 'trivial_abi' attribute can be applied to a C++ class, struct, or
union. It makes special functions of the annotated class (the destructor
and copy/move constructors) to be trivial for the purpose of calls and,
as a result, enables the annotated class or containing classes to be
passed or returned using the C ABI for the underlying type.
When a type that is considered trivial for the purpose of calls despite
having a non-trivial destructor (which happens only when the class type
or one of its subobjects is a 'trivial_abi' class) is passed to a
function, the callee is responsible for destroying the object.
For more background, see the discussions that took place on the mailing
list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/055955.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180101/thread.html#214043
rdar://problem/35204524
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039
llvm-svn: 324269
The constant is already reduced to 8-bits by the time we get here and the checks were just ensuring that it was 8 bits. Thus I don't think there's anyway for them to fail.
llvm-svn: 322244
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
and fold together into a single function.
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
This re-commits r320122 and r320124, minus two changes:
* Comparisons between a constant and a non-constant expression of enumeration
type never warn, not even if the constant is out of range. We should be
warning about the creation of such a constant, not about its use.
* We do not use more precise bit-widths for comparisons against bit-fields.
The more precise diagnostics probably are the right thing, but we should
consider moving them under their own warning flag.
Other than the refactoring, this patch should only change the behavior for the
buggy cases (where the warnings didn't take into account that promotion from
signed to unsigned can leave a range of inaccessible values in the middle of
the promoted type).
llvm-svn: 320211
> Unify implementation of our two different flavours of -Wtautological-compare.
>
> In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
> positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
> for the comparison.
This caused a new warning in Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 64.
I thought we didn't use to warn (with out-of-range-compare) when comparing
against the boundaries of a type?
llvm-svn: 320162
This broke Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 63.
Did this use to fall under the "in-range" case before? I thought we
didn't use to warn when comparing against the boundaries of a type.
llvm-svn: 320133
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
llvm-svn: 320122
This is a follow up of r302131, in which we forgot to add SemaChecking
tests. Adding these tests revealed two problems which have been fixed:
- added missing intrinsic __qdbl,
- properly range checking ssat16 and usat16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40888
llvm-svn: 320019
This is a fix for PR35509 in which we crash because we attempt to compute the
alignment of an incomplete type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40895
llvm-svn: 320017
codepath plus the new "minimum / maximum value of type" diagnostic to get the
same effect.
Move the warning for an in-range but tautological comparison of a constant (0
or 1) against a bool out of -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare into
the more-appropriate -Wtautological-constant-compare.
llvm-svn: 319942
An enumeration with a fixed underlying type can have any value in its
underlying type, not just those spanned by the values of its enumerators.
llvm-svn: 319875
It seems this somehow made -Wempty-body fire in some macro cases where
it didn't before, e.g.
../../third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/bitstream.c(169,5): error: if statement has empty body [-Werror,-Wempty-body]
ff_dlog(NULL, "new table index=%d size=%d\n", table_index, table_size);
^
../../third_party/ffmpeg\libavutil/internal.h(276,80): note: expanded from macro 'ff_dlog'
# define ff_dlog(ctx, ...) do { if (0) av_log(ctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
^
../../third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/bitstream.c(169,5): note: put the
semicolon on a separate line to silence this warning
Reverting until this can be figured out.
> Do not show it when `if` or `else` come from macros.
> E.g.,
>
> #define USED(A) if (A); else
> #define SOME_IF(A) if (A)
>
> void test() {
> // No warnings are shown in those cases now.
> USED(0);
> SOME_IF(0);
> }
>
> Patch by Ilya Biryukov!
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40185
llvm-svn: 318665
Do not show it when `if` or `else` come from macros.
E.g.,
#define USED(A) if (A); else
#define SOME_IF(A) if (A)
void test() {
// No warnings are shown in those cases now.
USED(0);
SOME_IF(0);
}
Patch by Ilya Biryukov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40185
llvm-svn: 318556
Summary:
As Mattias Eriksson has reported in PR35009, in C, for enums, the underlying type should
be used when checking for the tautological comparison, unlike C++, where the enumerator
values define the value range. So if not in CPlusPlus mode, use the enum underlying type.
Also, i have discovered a problem (a crash) when evaluating tautological-ness of the following comparison:
```
enum A { A_a = 0 };
if (a < 0) // expected-warning {{comparison of unsigned enum expression < 0 is always false}}
return 0;
```
This affects both the C and C++, but after the first fix, only C++ code was affected.
That was also fixed, while preserving (i think?) the proper diagnostic output.
And while there, attempt to enhance the test coverage.
Yes, some tests got moved around, sorry about that :)
Fixes PR35009
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rjmccall
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Rakete1111, efriedma, materi, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39122
llvm-svn: 316268
Use the new helper methods to get the underlying type for NSUInteger,
NSInteger types. This avoids spreading the knowledge of the underlying
types in various sites. For non-LLP64 targets, this has no change.
llvm-svn: 316013
The first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx
test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it.
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315875
Summary:
Convert clang::LangAS to a strongly typed enum
Currently both clang AST address spaces and target specific address spaces
are represented as unsigned which can lead to subtle errors if the wrong
type is passed. It is especially confusing in the CodeGen files as it is
not possible to see what kind of address space should be passed to a
function without looking at the implementation.
I originally made this change for our LLVM fork for the CHERI architecture
where we make extensive use of address spaces to differentiate between
capabilities and pointers. When merging the upstream changes I usually
run into some test failures or runtime crashes because the wrong kind of
address space is passed to a function. By converting the LangAS enum to a
C++11 we can catch these errors at compile time. Additionally, it is now
obvious from the function signature which kind of address space it expects.
I found the following errors while writing this patch:
- ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder::LayoutField was passing a clang AST address
space to TargetInfo::getPointer{Width,Align}()
- TypePrinter::printAttributedAfter() prints the numeric value of the
clang AST address space instead of the target address space.
However, this code is not used so I kept the current behaviour
- initializeForBlockHeader() in CGBlocks.cpp was passing
LangAS::opencl_generic to TargetInfo::getPointer{Width,Align}()
- CodeGenFunction::EmitBlockLiteral() was passing a AST address space to
TargetInfo::getPointerWidth()
- CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX::translateParameter() passed a target address space
to Qualifiers::addAddressSpace()
- CGOpenMPRuntimeNVPTX::getParameterAddress() was using
llvm::Type::getPointerTo() with a AST address space
- clang_getAddressSpace() returns either a LangAS or a target address
space. As this is exposed to C I have kept the current behaviour and
added a comment stating that it is probably not correct.
Other than this the patch should not cause any functional changes.
Reviewers: yaxunl, pcc, bader
Reviewed By: yaxunl, bader
Subscribers: jlebar, jholewinski, nhaehnle, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38816
llvm-svn: 315871
Currently Clang uses default address space (0) to represent private address space for OpenCL
in AST. There are two issues with this:
Multiple address spaces including private address space cannot be diagnosed.
There is no mangling for default address space. For example, if private int* is emitted as
i32 addrspace(5)* in IR. It is supposed to be mangled as PUAS5i but it is mangled as
Pi instead.
This patch attempts to represent OpenCL private address space explicitly in AST. It adds
a new enum LangAS::opencl_private and adds it to the variable types which are implicitly
private:
automatic variables without address space qualifier
function parameter
pointee type without address space qualifier (OpenCL 1.2 and below)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35082
llvm-svn: 315668
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315614
This function is used to perform semantic analysis on Microsoft style
`__va_start`. Rename it to make this more explicit. `__va_start` is
marked as `ALL_MS_LANGUAGES`, and requires Microsoft compatibility.
Other GNU targets will use `__builtin_va_start` instead. NFC.
Addresses post-commit review comments from David Majnemer.
llvm-svn: 314241
The `__va_start` intrinsic for Windows ARM does not account for const
correctness when performing a check. All local qualifiers are ignored
when validating the invocation. This was exposed by building the swift
stdlib against the Windows 10586 SDK for ARM. Simply expand out the
check for the two parameters and ignore the qualifiers for the check.
llvm-svn: 314226
For the triple thumbv7-apple-ios8.0.0 ssize_t is long and size_t is unsigned long,
while NSInteger is int and NSUinteger is unsigned int. Following
https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Strings/Articles/formatSpecifiers.html
Clang catches it and insert a cast to long, for example
printf("%zd", getNSInteger())
will be replaced with
printf("%zd", (long)getNSInteger())
but since the underlying type of ssize_t is long the specifier "%zd" is not getting replaced.
This diff changes this behavior to enable replacing the specifier "%zd" with the correct one.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38159
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 314011
As reported here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34692
A non-defined enum with a backing type was always defaulting to
being treated as a signed type. IN the case where it IS defined,
the signed-ness of the actual items is used.
This patch uses the underlying type's signed-ness in the non-defined
case to test signed-comparision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38145
llvm-svn: 313907
As Aaron Ballman has pointed out, that is not really correct.
So the key problem there is the invalidity of the testcase.
Revert r313747, and rework testcase in such a way, so these
details (platform-specific default enum sigdness) are
accounted for.
Also, add a C++-specific testcase.
llvm-svn: 313756
Hopefully fixes test-clang-msc-x64-on-i686-linux-RA build.
The underlying problem is that the enum is signed there.
Yet still, it is invalid for it to contain negative values,
so the comparison is always tautological in this case.
No differential, but related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313747
Recommit. Original commit was reverted because buildbots broke.
The error was only reproducible in the build with assertions.
The problem was that the diagnostic expected true/false as
bool, while it was provided as string "true"/"false".
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313745
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313677
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
This patch adds support for __builtin_cpu_is. I've tried to match the strings supported to the latest version of gcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35449
llvm-svn: 310657
Converting a _Complex type to a real one simply discards the imaginary part.
This can easily lead to loss of information so for safety (and GCC
compatibility) this patch disallows that when the conversion would be implicit.
The one exception is bool, which actually compares both real and imaginary
parts and so is safe.
llvm-svn: 310427
OpenCL 2.0 atomic builtin functions have a scope argument which is ideally
represented as synchronization scope argument in LLVM atomic instructions.
Clang supports translating Clang atomic builtin functions to LLVM atomic
instructions. However it currently does not support synchronization scope
of LLVM atomic instructions. Without this, users have to use LLVM assembly
code to implement OpenCL atomic builtin functions.
This patch adds OpenCL 2.0 atomic builtin functions as Clang builtin
functions, which supports generating LLVM atomic instructions with
synchronization scope operand.
Currently only constant memory scope argument is supported. Support of
non-constant memory scope argument will be added later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28691
llvm-svn: 310082
Move builtins from the x86 specific scope into the global
scope. Their use is still limited to x86_64 and aarch64 though.
This allows wine on aarch64 to properly handle variadic functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34475
llvm-svn: 308218
This patch series adds support for the IBM z14 processor. This part includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
Support for the -fzvector extension to vector float and the new
high-level vector intrinsics is provided by separate patches.
llvm-svn: 308197
Also add testcases for a bunch of expression forms that cause our evaluator to
crash. See PR33140 and PR32864 for crashes that this was causing.
This reverts r305287, which reverted r305239, which reverted r301742. The
previous revert claimed that buildbots were broken, but did not add any
testcases and the buildbots have lost all memory of what was wrong here.
Changes to test/OpenMP are not reverted; another change has triggered those
tests to change their output in the same way that r301742 did.
llvm-svn: 306346
Summary:
First, getCurFunction looks through blocks and lambdas, which is wrong.
Inside a lambda, va_start should refer to the lambda call operator
prototype. This fixes PR32737.
Second, we shouldn't use any of the getCur* methods, because they look
through contexts that we don't want to look through (EnumDecl,
CapturedStmtDecl). We can use CurContext directly as the calling
context.
Finally, this code assumed that CallExprs would never appear outside of
code contexts (block, function, obj-c method), which is wrong. Struct
member initializers are an easy way to create and parse exprs in a
non-code context.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32761
llvm-svn: 302188
Combine the logic doing the ms_abi/sysv_abi checks into one function so
that each check and its logical opposite are near each other. Now we
don't need two Sema entry points for MS va_start and regular va_start.
Refactor the code that checks if the va_start caller is a function,
block, or obj-c method. We do this in three places, and they are all
buggy for variadic lambdas (PR32737). After this change, I have one
place to apply the functional fix.
NFC
llvm-svn: 301968
CheckForIntOverflow used to implement a whitelist of top-level expressions to
send to the constant expression evaluator, which handled many more expressions
than the CheckForIntOverflow whitelist did.
llvm-svn: 301742
A boxed expression evaluates its subexpr and then calls an objc method to transform it into another value with pointer type. The objc method can never be constexpr and therefore this expression can never be evaluated. Fixes a miscompile boxing expressions with side-effects.
Also make ObjCBoxedExpr handling a normal part of the expression evaluator instead of being the only case besides full-expression where we check for integer overflow.
llvm-svn: 301721
Check unqualified type for ndrange argument in device_side_enqueue so
device_side_enqueue accept const and volatile qualified ndranges.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31458
Patch by Dmitry Borisenkov!
llvm-svn: 300988
The Result variable is unused both in Sema::CheckARMBuiltinFunctionCall
and Sema::CheckAArch64BuiltinFunctionCall, remove it.
Patch by Wei-Ren Chen!
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: aemerson, cfe-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32014
llvm-svn: 300572
Our _MM_HINT_T0/T1 constant values are 3/2 which matches gcc, but not icc or Intel documentation. Interestingly gcc had this same bug on their implementation of the gather/scatter builtins at one point too.
Fixes PR32411.
llvm-svn: 299233
Reasoning behind this change was allowing the function to accept all values
from range [-128, 255] since all of them can be encoded in an 8bit wide
value.
This differs from the prior state where only range [-128, 127] was accepted,
where values were assumed to be signed, whereas now the actual
interpretation of the immediate is deferred to the consumer as required.
Patch by Stefan Maksimovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31082
llvm-svn: 299229
This adds -Wbitfield-enum-conversion, which warns on implicit
conversions that happen on bitfield assignment that change the value of
some enumerators.
Values of enum type typically take on a very small range of values, so
they are frequently stored in bitfields. Unfortunately, there is no
convenient way to calculate the minimum number of bits necessary to
store all possible values at compile time, so users usually hard code a
bitwidth that works today and widen it as necessary to pass basic
testing and validation. This is very error-prone, and leads to stale
widths as enums grow. This warning aims to catch such bugs.
This would have found two real bugs in clang and two instances of
questionable code. See r297680 and r297654 for the full description of
the issues.
This warning is currently disabled by default while we investigate its
usefulness outside of LLVM.
The major cause of false positives with this warning is this kind of
enum:
enum E { W, X, Y, Z, SENTINEL_LAST };
The last enumerator is an invalid value used to validate inputs or size
an array. Depending on the prevalance of this style of enum across a
codebase, this warning may be more or less feasible to deploy. It also
has trouble on sentinel values such as ~0U.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, thakis
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: hfinkel, voskresensky.vladimir, sashab, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923
llvm-svn: 297761
The only valid values for scale immediate of scatter/gather builtins are 1, 2, 4, or 8. This patch enforces this in the frontend otherwise we generate invalid instruction encodings in the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30875
llvm-svn: 297642
Given that we have already explicitly stated in the qualifier that the
expression is __unaligned, it makes little sense to diagnose that the address
of the packed member may not be aligned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30884
llvm-svn: 297620
Removes immediate range checks for these instructions, since they have GPR
rt as their input operand.
Patch by Stefan Maksimovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30693
llvm-svn: 297485
instantiation.
In preparation for converting the template stack to a more general context
stack (so we can include context notes for other kinds of context).
llvm-svn: 295686
Removed ndrange_t as Clang builtin type and added
as a struct type in the OpenCL header.
Use type name to do the Sema checking in enqueue_kernel
and modify IR generation accordingly.
Review: D28058
Patch by Dmitry Borisenkov!
llvm-svn: 295311
This patch changes how we handle argument-dependent `diagnose_if`
attributes. In particular, we now check them in the same place that we
check for things like passing NULL to Nonnull args, etc. This is
basically better in every way than how we were handling them before. :)
This fixes PR31638, PR31639, and PR31640.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28889
llvm-svn: 293360
* In C++, never create a FunctionNoProtoType for a builtin (fixes C++1z
crasher from r289754).
* Fix type of __sync_synchronize to be a no-parameter function rather than a
varargs function. This matches GCC.
* Fix type of vfprintf to match its actual type. We gave it a wrong type due
to PR4290 (apparently autoconf generates invalid code and expects compilers
to choke it down or it miscompiles the program; the relevant error in clang
was downgraded to a warning in r122744 to fix other occurrences of this
autoconf brokenness, so we don't need this workaround any more).
* Turn off vararg argument checking for __noop, since it's not *really* a
varargs function. Alternatively we could add custom type checking for it
and synthesize parameter types matching the actual arguments in each call,
but that seemed like overkill.
llvm-svn: 290146
The function SemaBuiltinFPClassification removed superfluous float to double
casts, this was changed to also remove float to float casts but this isn't
valid in all cases, for example when doing an rvaluetolvalue cast. Added a
check to only remove if this was a conventional floating cast.
Added additional tests into SemaOpenCL/extensions to cover these cases
llvm-svn: 289650
This change makes sure single-precision floating point types are used if the
cl_fp64 extension is not supported by the target.
Also removed the check to see whether the OpenCL version is >= 1.2, as this has
been incorporated into the extension setting code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24235
llvm-svn: 289544
- Rename CheckMinZero to CheckMaxUnsignedZero to reflect its actual purpose.
- Remove unused parameters from CheckAbsoluteValueFunction and
CheckMaxUnsignedZero functions.
- Refactor the function name check so both functions can use the same one.
llvm-svn: 288756
New default warning that triggers when an unsigned zero is used in a call to
std::max. For unsigned values, zero is the minimum value, so any call to
std::max is always equal to the other value. A common pattern was to take
the max of zero and the difference of two unsigned values, not taking into
account that unsigned values wrap around below zero. This warning also emits
a note with a fixit hint to remove the zero and call to std::max.
llvm-svn: 288732
declared variables.
Teach Sema to check the aligned attribute attached to variable
declarations so that it doesn't issue spurious warnings.
rdar://problem/26517471
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21099
llvm-svn: 288267
This commit teaches clang that is has to emit a warning when NULL is passed
as the 'expected' pointer parameter into an atomic compare exchange call.
rdar://18926650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26978
llvm-svn: 287776
Summary:
This is a simple sema check patch for arguments of `__builtin_arm_rsr` and the related builtins, which currently do not allow special registers with indexes >7.
Some of the possible register name formats these builtins accept are:
```
{c}p<coprocessor>:<op1>:c<CRn>:c<CRm>:<op2>
```
```
o0:op1:CRn:CRm:op2
```
where `op1` / `op2` are integers in the range [0, 7] and `CRn` / `CRm` are integers in the range [0, 15].
The current sema check does not allow `CRn` > 7 and accepts `op2` up to 15.
Reviewers: LukeCheeseman, rengolin
Subscribers: asl, aemerson, rengolin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26464
llvm-svn: 287378
Summary:
Add a warning when assigning enums to bitfields without an explicit
unsigned underlying type. This is to prevent problems with MSVC
compatibility, since the Microsoft ABI defaults to storing enums with a
signed type, causing inconsistencies with saving to/reading from
bitfields.
Also disabled the warning in the dr0xx.cpp test which throws the error,
and added a test for the warning.
The warning can be disabled with -Wno-signed-enum-bitfield.
Patch by Sasha Bermeister!
Reviewers: rnk, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, thakis, dcheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24289
llvm-svn: 287177
Make handling integer parameters more flexible:
- For the number of events argument allow to pass larger
integers than 32 bits as soon as compiler can prove that
the range fits in 32 bits. If not, the diagnostic will be given.
- Change type of the arguments specifying the sizes of
the corresponding block arguments to be size_t.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26509
llvm-svn: 286849
- Accept NULL pointer as a valid parameter value for clk_event.
- Generate clk_event_t arguments of internal
__enqueue_kernel_XXX function as pointers in generic address space.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26507
llvm-svn: 286836
Unfortunately, the backend currently doesn't fold masks into the instructions correctly when they come from these shufflevectors. I'll work on that in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 285667
The second argument to __builtin_alloca_with_align is supposed to be in
bits, not bytes. Using alignof there would be indicative of a bug.
llvm-svn: 285609
__builtin_alloca always uses __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ for the alignment of
the allocation. __builtin_alloca_with_align allows the programmer to
specify the alignment of the allocation.
This fixes PR30658.
llvm-svn: 285544
Unfortunately, the backend currently doesn't fold masks into the instructions correctly when they come from these shufflevectors. I'll work on that in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 285540
This reverts commit r285007 and reapply r284990, with a fix for the
opencl test that I broke. Original commit message follows:
These new builtins support a mechanism for logging OS events, using a
printf-like format string to specify the layout of data in a buffer.
The _buffer_size version of the builtin can be used to determine the size
of the buffer to allocate to hold the data, and then __builtin_os_log_format
can write data into that buffer. This implements format checking to report
mismatches between the format string and the data arguments. Most of this
code was written by Chris Willmore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25888
llvm-svn: 285019
These new builtins support a mechanism for logging OS events, using a
printf-like format string to specify the layout of data in a buffer.
The _buffer_size version of the builtin can be used to determine the size
of the buffer to allocate to hold the data, and then __builtin_os_log_format
can write data into that buffer. This implements format checking to report
mismatches between the format string and the data arguments. Most of this
code was written by Chris Willmore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25888
llvm-svn: 284990
This commit improves the '-Wformat' warnings by ensuring that the formatting
checker can see through Objective-C message sends when we are calling an
Objective-C method with an appropriate format_arg attribute.
rdar://23622446
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25820
llvm-svn: 284961
This patch teaches clang to range check immediates for MIPS MSA instrinsics.
This checking is done strictly in comparison to some existing GCC
implementations. E.g. msa_andvi_b(var, 257) does not result in andvi $wX, 1.
Similarily msa_ldi_b takes a range of -128 to 127.
As part of this effort, correct the existing MSA test as it has both illegal
types and immediates.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25017
llvm-svn: 284620
This reverts commit r283802. It introduces temporarily static
initializers, because StringRef ctor isn't (yet) constexpr for
string literals.
I plan to get there this week, but apparently GCC is so terrible
with these static initializer right now (10 min+ extra codegen
time was reported) that I'll hold on to this patch till the
constexpr one is ready, and land these at the same time.
llvm-svn: 283920
This commit improves the packed member warning by showing the name of the
anonymous structure/union when it was defined within a typedef declaration.
rdar://28498901
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25106
llvm-svn: 283304
Summary:
This lets people link against LLVM and their own version of the UTF
library.
I determined this only affects llvm, clang, lld, and lldb by running
$ git grep -wl 'UTF[0-9]\+\|\bConvertUTF\bisLegalUTF\|getNumBytesFor' | cut -f 1 -d '/' | sort | uniq
clang
lld
lldb
llvm
Tested with
ninja lldb
ninja check-clang check-llvm check-lld
(ninja check-lldb doesn't complete for me with or without this patch.)
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: klimek, beanz, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24996
llvm-svn: 282822
The backend can't encode all possible values of the argument and will fail isel. Checking in the frontend presents a friendlier experience to the user.
I started with builtins that can only take _MM_CUR_DIRECTION or _MM_NO_EXC. More builtins coming in the future.
llvm-svn: 282228
Summary:
The diagnostic did not handle ~ well. An expression such as ~0 is often used when 'all ones' is needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24232
llvm-svn: 282156
Summary:
Offset was doubled in size, but the assignment was missing. We just need
to reassign to the original variable in this case to fix it.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, echristo
Subscribers: meikeb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24648
llvm-svn: 281706
Summary:
The warning for a format string not being a string literal and therefore
being potentially insecure is overly strict for indices into string
literals. This fix checks if the index into the string literal is
precomputable. If that's the case it will check if the suffix of that
string literal is a valid format string string literal. It will still
issue the aforementioned warning for out of range indices into the
string literal.
Patch by Meike Baumgärtner (meikeb)
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24584
llvm-svn: 281686
The underlying type for an enumeration in C is either char, signed int, or unsigned int. In the case the underlying type is chosen to be char (such as when passing -fshort-enums or using __attribute__((packed)) on the enum declaration), the enumeration can result in undefined behavior. However, when the underlying type is signed int or unsigned int (or long long as an extension), there is no undefined behavior because the types are compatible. This patch silences diagnostics for the latter while retaining the diagnostics for the former.
This patch addresses PR29140.
llvm-svn: 281632
Summary: This reverts r281527 because I messed up the attribution.
Reviewers: srhines
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24579
llvm-svn: 281530
Summary:
The warning for a format string not being a sting literal and therefore
being potentially insecure is overly strict for indecies into sting
literals. This fix checks if the index into the string literal is
precomputable. If thats the case it will check if the suffix of that
sting literal is a valid format string string literal. It will still
issue the aforementioned warning for out of range indecies into the
string literal.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23820
llvm-svn: 281527
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment
faults in some architectures if the pointer value is dereferenced.
This change adds a new warning to clang emitted when taking the address
of a packed member. A packed member is either a field/data member
declared as attribute((packed)) or belonging to a struct/class
declared as such. The associated flag is -Waddress-of-packed-member.
Conversions (either implicit or via a valid casting) to pointer types
with lower or equal alignment requirements (e.g. void* or char*)
will silence the warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
llvm-svn: 278483
Follow-up from r278264 after Joerg's feedback.
Since bzero is not standard, be more strict: also check if the first
argument is a pointer, which harden the check for when it does not come
originally from a builtin.
llvm-svn: 278379
Reapply r277787. For memset (and others) we can get diagnostics like:
struct stat { int x; };
void foo(struct stat *stamps) {
bzero(stamps, sizeof(stamps));
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
}
t.c:7:28: warning: 'memset' call operates on objects of type 'struct stat' while the size is based on a different type 'struct stat *' [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
t.c:7:28: note: did you mean to dereference the argument to 'sizeof' (and multiply it by the number of elements)?
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
^~~~~~
This patch implements the same class of warnings for bzero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22525
rdar://problem/18963514
llvm-svn: 278264
If the return type is a pointer and the function returns the reference to a
pointer, don't warn since only the value is returned, not the reference.
If a reference function parameter appears in the reference chain, don't warn
since binding happens at the caller scope, so addresses returned are not
to local stack. This includes default arguments as well.
llvm-svn: 277889
For builtin logical operators, there is a well-defined ordering of argument
evaluation. For overloaded operator of the same type, there is no argument
evaluation order, similar to other function calls. When both are present,
uninstantiated templates with an operator&& is treated as an unresolved
function call. Unresolved function calls are treated as normal function calls,
and may result in false positives when the builtin logical operator is used.
Have the unsequenced checker ignore dependent expressions to avoid this
false positive. The check also happens in template instantiations to catch
when the overloaded operator is used.
llvm-svn: 277866
Silence the -Wbitfield-constant-conversion warning for when -1 or other
negative values are assigned to unsigned bitfields, provided that the bitfield
is wider than the minimum number of bits needed to encode the negative value.
llvm-svn: 277796
For memset (and others) we can get diagnostics like:
struct stat { int x; };
void foo(struct stat *stamps) {
bzero(stamps, sizeof(stamps));
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
}
t.c:7:28: warning: 'memset' call operates on objects of type 'struct stat' while the size is based on a different type 'struct stat *' [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
t.c:7:28: note: did you mean to dereference the argument to 'sizeof' (and multiply it by the number of elements)?
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
^~~~~~
This patch implements the same class of warnings for bzero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22525
rdar://problem/18963514
llvm-svn: 277787
