Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
llvm-svn: 220573
Includes parsing and semantic analysis for 'omp teams' directive support from OpenMP 4.0. Adds additional analysis to 'omp target' directive with 'omp teams' directive.
llvm-svn: 219385
Includes parsing and semantic analysis for 'omp teams' directive support from OpenMP 4.0. Adds additional analysis to 'omp target' directive with 'omp teams' directive.
llvm-svn: 219197
This reverts commit r211096. Looks like it broke the msvc build:
SemaOpenMP.cpp(140) : error C4519: default template arguments are only allowed on a class template
llvm-svn: 211113
Until now all CUDA-specific attributes were represented with
CXCursor_UnexposedAttr; now they are actually implemented, including the Python
bindings.
llvm-svn: 209767
It's possible that the "comment AST" may be replaced or split out in the
midterm, any anyway this makes the headers easier to read.
Developers don't currently need to include "clang-c/Documentation.h" explicitly
and there's no macro to test for availability yet.
The raw comment and brief comment accessors have been kept in Index.h though
brief support may also move here as a separate proposal.
This is not a deprecation, just a gentle separation of concerns as we look to
simplify the built-in representation of comment nodes and support external
comment processors.
llvm-svn: 207392
The change was landed without review or test cases.
It trivially broke almost any stable application checking for Severity >=
CXDiagnostic_Error or indeed any other kind of severity comparison upon
encountering a 'remark'.
Mapped to CXDiagnostic_Warning until a workable solution is proposed to the
list that preserves API stability.
(It's also not clear why the rest of r202475 wasn't simply implemented as a
modifier to the existing 'warning' level.)
llvm-svn: 207319
A 'remark' is information that is not an error or a warning, but rather some
additional information provided to the user. In contrast to a 'note' a 'remark'
is an independent diagnostic, whereas a 'note' always depends on another
diagnostic.
A typical use case for remark nodes is information provided to the user, e.g.
information provided by the vectorizer about loops that have been vectorized.
This patch provides the initial implementation of 'remarks'. It includes the
actual definiton of the remark nodes, their printing as well as basic parameter
handling. We are reusing the existing diagnostic parameters which means a remark
can be enabled with normal '-Wdiagnostic-name' flags and can be upgraded to
an error using '-Werror=diagnostic-name'. '-Werror' alone does not upgrade
remarks.
This patch is by intention minimal in terms of parameter handling. More
experience and more discussions will most likely lead to further enhancements
in the parameter handling.
llvm-svn: 202475
