- __func__ or __FUNCTION__ returns captured statement's parent
function name, not the one compiler generated.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1491
Reviewed by bkramer
llvm-svn: 189219
Basically, isInMainFile considers line markers, and isWrittenInMainFile
doesn't. Distinguishing between the two is useful when dealing with
files which are preprocessed files or rewritten with -frewrite-includes
(so we don't, for example, print useless warnings).
llvm-svn: 188968
1. We now print the return type of lambdas and return type deduced functions
as "auto". Trailing return types with decltype print the underlying type.
2. Use the lambda or block scope for the PredefinedExpr type instead of the
parent function. This fixes PR16946, a strange mismatch between type of the
expression and the actual result.
3. Verify the type in CodeGen.
4. The type for blocks is still wrong. They are numbered and the name is not
known until CodeGen.
llvm-svn: 188900
function: it can't be 'void' and it can't be an initializer list. We give a
hard error for these rather than treating them as undefined behavior (we can
and probably should do the same for non-POD types in C++11, but as of this
change we don't).
Slightly rework the checking of variadic arguments in a function with a format
attribute to ensure that certain kinds of format string problem (non-literal
string, too many/too few arguments, ...) don't suppress this error.
llvm-svn: 187735
Sema::PerformObjectMemberConversion assumed that the Qualifier it was
given holds a type. However, the specifier could hold just a namespace.
In this case, we should ignore the qualifier and not attempt to cast to
it.
llvm-svn: 187715
passing a retainable object arg to a CF audited function
expecting a CF object type. Issue a normal type mismatch
diagnostic. This is wip // rdar://14569171
llvm-svn: 187532
It turns out that Plum Hall depends on us not emitting an error on
integer literals which fit into long long, but fit into
unsigned long long. So C99 conformance requires not conforming to C99. :)
llvm-svn: 187172
Switch some warnings over to errors which should never have been warnings
in the first place. (Also, a minor fix to the preprocessor rules for
integer literals while I'm here.)
llvm-svn: 186903
getLocForEndOfToken() isn't guaranteed to succeed; if it doesn't, make sure
we do something sane.
Fixes PR16673. I'm not sure how to write a testcase for this short of grepping
through the diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 186889
This is the same way GenericSelectionExpr works, and it's generally a
more consistent approach.
A large part of this patch is devoted to caching the value of the condition
of a ChooseExpr; it's needed to avoid threading an ASTContext into
IgnoreParens().
Fixes <rdar://problem/14438917>.
llvm-svn: 186738
Sema needs to be able to accurately determine what will be
emitted as a constant initializer and what will not, so
we get accurate errors in C and accurate -Wglobal-constructors
warnings in C++. This makes Expr::isConstantInitializer match
CGExprConstant as closely as possible.
llvm-svn: 186464
Combined with typo correction's new ability to apply global/absolute nested
name specifiers to possible corrections, cases such as in PR12287 where the
desired function is being shadowed by a lexically closer function with the
same name but a different number of parameters will now include a FixIt.
On a side note, since the test for this change caused
test/SemaCXX/typo-correction.cpp to exceed the typo correction limit for
a single file, I've included a test case for exceeding the limit and added
some comments to both the original and part two of typo-correction.cpp
warning future editors of the files about the limit.
llvm-svn: 185881
Use UsualArithmeticConversions unconditionally in analysis of
comparisons and conditional operators: the method performs
the usual arithmetic conversions if both sides are arithmetic, and
usual unary conversions if they are not. This is just a cleanup
for conditional operators; for comparisons, it fixes the issue that
we would try to check isArithmetic() on an atomic type.
Also, fix GetExprRange() in SemaChecking.cpp so it deals with variables
of atomic type correctly.
Fixes PR15537.
llvm-svn: 185857
The removal is tried by retrying the failed lookup of a correction
candidate with either the MemberContext or SS (CXXScopeSpecifier) or
both set to NULL if they weren't already. If the candidate identifier
is then looked up successfully, make a note in the candidate that the
SourceRange should include any existing nested name specifier even if
the candidate isn't adding a different one (i.e. the candidate has a
NULL NestedNameSpecifier).
Also tweak the diagnostic messages to differentiate between a suggestion
that just replaces the identifer but leaves the existing nested name
specifier intact and one that replaces the entire qualified identifier,
in cases where the suggested replacement is unqualified.
llvm-svn: 185487
Blocks, like lambdas, can be written in contexts which are required to be
treated as the same under ODR. Unlike lambdas, it isn't possible to actually
take the address of a block, so the mangling of the block itself doesn't
matter. However, objects like static variables inside a block do need to
be mangled in a consistent way.
There are basically three components here. One, block literals need a
consistent numbering. Two, objects/types inside a block literal need
to be mangled using it. Three, objects/types inside a block literal need
to have their linkage computed correctly.
llvm-svn: 185372
passing arguments in the fixed style.
We have an abstraction for deciding this, but it's (1) deep in
IR-generation, (2) necessarily tied to exact argument lists, and
(3) triggered by unprototyped function types, which we can't
legitimately make in C++ mode. So this solution, wherein Sema
rewrites the function type to an exact prototype but leaves the
variadic bit enabled so as to request x86-64-like platforms to
pass the extra variadic info, is very much a hack, but it's one
that works in practice on the platforms that LLDB will support
in the medium term --- the only place we know of where it's a
problem is instance methods in Windows, where variadic functions
are implicitly cdecl. We may have a more abstracted base on which
to build a solution by then.
rdar://13731520
llvm-svn: 185112
As noted by Richard in the post:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130624/082605.html, the following code should not add an entry
into PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations, since local instantiations
should only occur within the context of other instantiations:
int foo(double y) {
struct Lambda {
template<class T> T operator()(T t) const { return t; };
} lambda;
return lambda(y);
}
Hence the attached code does the following:
1) In MarkFunctionReferenced, check if ActiveInstantiations.size()
is non-zero before adding to PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations.
2) In InstantiateFunctionDefinition, we swap out/in
PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations so that only those
pending local instantiations that are added during the instantiation
of the current function are instantiated recursively.
llvm-svn: 184903
-performSelector: and friends return a value that is boxed as an Objective-C
pointer. Sometimes it is an Objective-C pointer, sometimes it isn't.
Some clients may wish to silence this warning based on calling
this method.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14147304>
llvm-svn: 184789
The goal of this sugar node is to be able to look at an arbitrary
FunctionType and tell if any of the parameters were decayed from an
array or function type. Ultimately this is necessary to implement
Microsoft's C++ name mangling scheme, which mangles decayed arrays
differently from normal pointers.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1014
llvm-svn: 184763
Previously, it only ever fired for zeros which formed null pointers.
Now, hilariously, in C++98 this was almost anything. Including tricks
like warning on the divisor in this code:
typedef char c3[3];
size_t f(c3* ptr) {
return (sizeof(ptr) / sizeof(*ptr)) / (size_t)(!(sizeof(ptr) % sizeof(*ptr)));
}
Why the RHS of the outer divide is a null pointer constant is a sordid
tale of sorrow. Anyways, the committee fixed this for C++11 and onward
as part of core isssue 903, and Richard recently implemented this fix
causing the warning to go away here (and elsewhere).
This patch restores the warning here and adds it for numerous other
somewhat obvious gaffes:
int g(int x) {
return x / (int)(0.0);
}
The patch is essentially just using the full power of our constant
folding in Clang to produce the warning, but insisting that it must fold
to an *integer* which is zero so that we don't get false positives
anywhere.
llvm-svn: 183970
