This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of pr24489. The bug is not fixed (as in more of the tests that were marked this way are failing), but this set is passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349665
Summary: They all correspond to bugs that are already logged and I've added the appropriate (or most appropriate) bug numbers. This leaves only a handful of failing tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47892
llvm-svn: 334210
Summary:
We would fail to resolve (and thus display the value of) any
templated type which contained a template template argument even
though we don't really use template arguments.
This patch adds minimal support for template template arguments,
but I doubt we need any more than that.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44613
llvm-svn: 328984
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Summary:
One of the tests there does not work with gcc, so I'm spinning that off into a separate test, so
that we can XFAIL it with more granularity.
I am also renaming the test to reflect the fact that it no longer tests only integer arguments.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21923
llvm-svn: 274505
