The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Explicitly avoided changing the strings in the clang-format tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44975
llvm-svn: 332350
Summary: This will be shared by include insertion/deletion library.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46758
llvm-svn: 332284
Summary:
This diff improves the Objective-C guessing heuristic by
replacing the hard-coded list of a subset of Objective-C @keywords
with a general check which supports all @keywords.
I also added a few more Foundation keywords which were missing from
the heuristic.
Test Plan: Unit tests updated. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45521
llvm-svn: 329918
Summary:
Currently, indentation of Objective-C method names which are wrapped
onto the next line due to a long return type is controlled by the
style option `IndentWrappedFunctionNames`.
This diff changes the behavior so we always indent wrapped Objective-C
selector names.
NOTE: I partially reverted 6159c0fbd1 / rL242484, as it was causing wrapped selectors to be double-indented. Its tests in FormatTestObjC.cpp still pass.
Test Plan: Tests updated. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak, stephanemoore, thakis
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: stephanemoore, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45004
llvm-svn: 329916
Previously, we would format:
int a() { ... }
[[unused]] int b() { ... }
as...
int a() {} [[unused] int b() {}
Now we correctly format each on its own line.
Similarly, we would detect:
[[unused]] int b() { return 42; }
As a lambda and leave it on a single line, even if that was disallowed
by the format style.
llvm-svn: 329816
Summary: Extend various verifyFormat helper functions to check that the
expected text is "stable". This provides some protection against bugs
where formatting results are ocilating between two forms, or continually
change in some other way.
Testing Done:
* Ran unit tests.
* Reproduced a known instability in preprocessor indentation which was
caught by this new check.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42034
llvm-svn: 329231
Summary:
The following C++ code was being detected by
`guessLanguage()` as Objective-C:
#define FOO(...) auto bar = [] __VA_ARGS__;
This was because `[] __VA_ARGS__` is not currently detected as a C++
lambda expression (it has no parens or braces), so
`TokenAnnotator::parseSquare()` incorrectly treats the opening square
as an ObjC method expression.
We have two options to fix this:
1. Parse `[] __VA_ARGS__` explicitly as a C++ lambda
2. Make it so `[]` is never parsed as an Objective-C method expression
This diff implements option 2, which causes the `[` to be parsed
as `TT_ArraySubscriptLSquare` instead of `TT_ObjCMethodExpr`.
Note that when I fixed this, it caused one change in formatting
behavior, where the following was implicitly relying on the `[`
being parsed as `TT_ObjCMethodExpr`:
A<int * []> a;
becomes:
A<int *[]> a;
with `Style.PointerAlignment = Middle`.
I don't really know what the desired format is for this syntax; the
test was added by Janusz Sobczak and integrated by @djasper in
b511fe9818
.
I went ahead and changed the test for now.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36248
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, djasper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45169
llvm-svn: 329070
Summary:
This fixes an issue brought up by djasper@ in his review of D44790. We
handled top-level child lines, but if those child lines themselves
had child lines, we didn't handle them.
Rather than use recursion (which could blow out the stack), I use a
DenseSet to hold the set of lines we haven't yet checked (since order
doesn't matter), and update the set to add the children of each
line as we check it.
Test Plan: New tests added. Confirmed tests failed before fix
and passed after fix.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44831
llvm-svn: 328628
Summary:
When I wrote `ObjCHeaderStyleGuesser`, I incorrectly assumed the
correct way to iterate over all tokens in `AnnotatedLine` was to
iterate over the linked list tokens starting with
`AnnotatedLine::First`.
However, `AnnotatedLine` also contains a vector
`AnnotedLine::Children` with child `AnnotedLine`s which have their own
tokens which we need to iterate over.
Because I didn't iterate over the tokens in the children lines, the
ObjC style guesser would fail on syntax like:
#define FOO ({ NSString *s = ... })
as the statement(s) inside { ... } are child lines.
This fixes the bug and adds a test. I confirmed the test
failed before the fix, and passed after the fix.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak, Wizard
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44790
llvm-svn: 328220
For multiline raw string literals, we generally want to respect the
author's choice of linebreak before the 'R"(' as the rest of the raw
string might be aligned to it and we cannot (commonly) modify the
content.
For single-line raw string literals, this doesn't make any sense and so
we should just treat them as regular string literals in this regard.
llvm-svn: 328201
When SpacesInParentheses is set to true clang-format does not add a
space before fully qualified names. For example:
do_something(::globalVar );
Fix by Darby Payne. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 328200
Summary:
We received reports of the Objective-C style guesser getting a false
negative on header files like:
CGSize SizeOfThing(MyThing thing);
This adds more Core Graphics identifiers to the Objective-C style
guesser.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: jolesiak, djasper
Subscribers: krasimir, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44632
llvm-svn: 328175
Summary:
This addresses bug 36766 and a FIXME in tests about empty lines before
`}[;] // comment` lines.
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44631
llvm-svn: 327861
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect the following as an
Objective-C block type:
FOO(^);
when it actually must be a C or C++ macro dealing with an XOR
statement or an XOR operator overload.
According to the Clang Block Language Spec:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BlockLanguageSpec.html
block types are of the form:
int (^)(char, float)
and block variables of block type are of the form:
void (^blockReturningVoidWithVoidArgument)(void);
int (^blockReturningIntWithIntAndCharArguments)(int, char);
void (^arrayOfTenBlocksReturningVoidWithIntArgument[10])(int);
This tightens up the detection so we don't unnecessarily detect
C macros which pass in the XOR operator.
Depends On D43904
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests &&
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43906
llvm-svn: 327285
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect C++11 and C++17 attribute
specifiers like the following as Objective-C method invocations:
[[noreturn]];
[[clang::fallthrough]];
[[noreturn, deprecated("so sorry")]];
[[using gsl: suppress("type")]];
To fix this, I ported part of the logic from
tools/clang/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp into TokenAnnotator.cpp so we
can explicitly parse and identify C++11 attribute specifiers.
This allows the guessLanguage() and getStyle() APIs to correctly
guess files containing the C++11 attribute specifiers as C++,
not Objective-C.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43902
llvm-svn: 327284
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect the following as an
Objective-C for-in statement:
for (int x = in.value(); ...) {}
because the logic only decided a for-loop was definitely *not*
an Objective-C for-in loop after it saw a semicolon or a colon.
To fix this, I delayed the decision of whether this was a for-in
statement until after we found the matching right-paren, at which
point we know if we've seen a semicolon or not.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak
Reviewed By: jolesiak
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43904
llvm-svn: 326815
Summary:
Code that used to be formatted as `if (! + object) {` is now formatted as `if (!+object) {`
(we have a particular object in our codebase where unary `operator+` is overloaded to return the underlying value, which in this case is a `bool`)
We still preserve the TypeScript behavior where `!` is a trailing non-null operator. (This is already tested by an existing unit test in `FormatTestJS.cpp`)
It doesn't appear like handling of consecutive unary operators are tested in general, so I added another test for completeness
Patch contributed by @kevinl!
Reviewers: krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43312
llvm-svn: 326792
Summary:
When disabled, this option allows removing the space before colon,
making it act more like the semi-colon. When enabled (default), the
current behavior is not affected.
This mostly affects C++11 loop, initializer list, inheritance list and
container literals:
class Foo: Bar {}
Foo::Foo(): a(a) {}
for (auto i: myList) {}
f({a: 1, b: 2, c: 3});
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: xvallspl, teemperor, karies, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32525
llvm-svn: 326426
Summary:
This fixes a few issues djasper@ brought up in his review of D43522.
Test Plan:
make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43598
llvm-svn: 326205
Summary:
Make the new GetStyleWithEmptyFileName test case independent
of the file system used when running the test. Since the
test is supposed to use the fallback "Google" style we now
use a InMemoryFileSystem to make sure that we do not accidentaly
find a .clang-format file in the real file system. That could
for example happen when having the build directory inside the
llvm och clang repo (as there is a .clang-format file inside
the repos).
Reviewers: vsapsai, jolesiak, krasimir, benhamilton
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: uabelho, twoh, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43732
llvm-svn: 326086
Summary:
D43522 caused an assertion failure when getStyle() was called with
an empty filename:
P8065
This adds a test to reproduce the failure and fixes the issue by
ensuring we never pass an empty filename to
Environment::CreateVirtualEnvironment().
Test Plan: New test added. Ran test with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Before diff, test failed with P8065. Now, test passes.
Reviewers: vsapsai, jolesiak, krasimir
Reviewed By: vsapsai
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43590
llvm-svn: 325722
Summary:
For clients which don't have a filesystem, calling getStyle() doesn't
make much sense (there's no .clang-format files to search for).
In this diff, I hoist out the language-guessing logic from getStyle()
and move it into a new API guessLanguage().
I also added support for guessing the language of files which have no
extension (they could be C++ or ObjC).
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: jolesiak, krasimir
Reviewed By: jolesiak, krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43522
llvm-svn: 325691
Summary:
When a preprocessor indent closes after the last line of normal code we do not
correctly fixup include guard indents. For example:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
#endif
#endif
incorrectly reformats to:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
# endif
#endif
To resolve this issue we must fixup levels after parseFile(). Delaying
the fixup introduces a new state, so consolidate include guard search
state into an enum.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42035
llvm-svn: 324246
Summary:
When a preprocessor indent closes after the last line of normal code we do not
correctly fixup include guard indents. For example:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
#endif
#endif
incorrectly reformats to:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
int i;
# define A 0
# endif
#endif
To resolve this issue we must fixup levels after parseFile(). Delaying
the fixup introduces a new state, so consolidate include guard search
state into an enum.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42035
llvm-svn: 324238
Summary:
r312125, which introduced preprocessor indentation, shipped with a known
issue where "indentation of comments immediately before indented
preprocessor lines is toggled on each run". For example these two forms
toggle:
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
// comment
# define A 0
#endif
#endif
#ifndef HEADER_H
#define HEADER_H
#if 1
// comment
# define A 0
#endif
#endif
This happens because we check vertical alignment against the '#' yet
indent to the level of the 'define'. This patch resolves this issue by
aligning against the '#'.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42408
llvm-svn: 323904
Summary:
This patch adds canonical delimiter support to the raw string formatting.
This allows matching delimiters to be updated to the canonical one.
Reviewers: bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42187
llvm-svn: 322956
Summary:
This patch addresses bug 36002, where a combination of options causes the line
following a short block in macro to be merged with that macro.
Reviewers: bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42298
llvm-svn: 322954
Summary:
This patch changes the structure for raw string formatting options by making it
language based (enumerate delimiters per language) as opposed to delimiter-based
(specify the language for a delimiter). The raw string formatting now uses an
appropriate style from the .clang-format file, if exists.
Reviewers: bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42098
llvm-svn: 322634
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
When we break a long line like:
Column limit: 21
|
// foo foo foo foo foo foo foo foo foo foo foo foo
The local decision when to allow protruding vs. breaking can lead to this
outcome (2 excess characters, 2 breaks):
// foo foo foo foo foo
// foo foo foo foo foo
// foo foo
While strictly staying within the column limit leads to this strictly better
outcome (fully below the column limit, 2 breaks):
// foo foo foo foo
// foo foo foo foo
// foo foo foo foo
To get an optimal solution, we would need to consider all combinations of excess
characters vs. breaking for all lines, but that would lead to a significant
increase in the search space of the algorithm for little gain.
Instead, we blindly try both approches and·select the one that leads to the
overall lower penalty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40605
llvm-svn: 319541
This fixes some bugs in the reflowing logic and splits out the concerns
of reflowing from BreakableToken.
Things to do after this patch:
- Refactor the breakProtrudingToken function possibly into a class, so we
can split it up into methods that operate on the common state.
- Optimize whitespace compression when reflowing by using the next possible
split point instead of the latest possible split point.
- Retry different strategies for reflowing (strictly staying below the
column limit vs. allowing excess characters if possible).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40310
llvm-svn: 319314
Summary:
clang-format already removes empty lines at the beginning & end of
blocks:
int x() {
foo(); // lines before and after will be removed.
}
However because lamdas and arrow functions are parsed as expressions,
the existing logic to remove empty lines in UnwrappedLineFormatter
doesn't handle them.
This change special cases arrow functions in ContinuationIndenter to
remove empty lines:
x = []() {
foo(); // lines before and after will now be removed.
};
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40178
llvm-svn: 318537
For each line that we break in a protruding token, compute whether the
penalty of breaking is actually larger than the penalty of the excess
characters. Only break if that is the case.
llvm-svn: 318515
Create more orthogonal pieces. The restructuring made it easy to try out
several alternatives to D33589, and while none of the alternatives
turned out to be the right solution, the underlying simplification of
the structure is helpful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39900
llvm-svn: 318141
Summary:
This patch fixes a regression introduced in r312904, where the formatter confuses
the `else` in `#else` with an `else` of an `if-else` statement.
For example, formatting this code with google style
```
#ifdef A
int f() {}
#else
int f() {}
#endif
```
resulted in
```
#ifdef A
int f() {}
#else
int f() {
}
#endif
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37973
llvm-svn: 314683
Summary:
NamespaceEndCommentsFixer did not fix namespace comments when the brace opening the namespace was not on the same line as the "namespace" keyword.
It occurs in Allman, GNU and Linux styles and whenever BraceWrapping.AfterNamespace is true.
Before:
```lang=cpp
namespace a
{
void f();
void g();
}
```
After:
```lang=cpp
namespace a
{
void f();
void g();
} // namespace a
```
Reviewers: krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37904
llvm-svn: 314279
Keep space before or after the &/&& tokens, but not both. For example,
auto [x,y] = a;
auto &[xr, yr] = a; // LLVM style
auto& [xr, yr] = a; // google style
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D35743
llvm-svn: 314264
Correctly determine when [ is part of a structured binding instead of a
lambda.
To be able to reuse the implementation already available, this patch also:
- sets the Previous link of FormatTokens in the UnwrappedLineParser
- moves the isCppStructuredBinding function into FormatToken
Before:
auto const const &&[x, y] { A *i };
After:
auto const const && [x, y]{A * i};
Fixing formatting of the type of the structured binding is still missing.
llvm-svn: 313742
Most of the work was already done when we introduced a look-behind based
lambda introducer detection.
This patch finishes the transition by completely relying on the simple
lambda introducer detection and simply recursing into normal
brace-parsing code to parse until the end of the introducer.
This fixes initializers in lambdas, including nested lambdas.
Before:
auto a = [b = [c = 42]{}]{};
auto b = [c = &i + 23]{};
After:
auto a = [b = [c = 42] {}] {};
auto b = [c = &i + 23] {};
llvm-svn: 313622
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34016 - **"extern C part"**
**Problem:**
Due to the lack of "brace wrapping extern" flag, clang format does parse the block after **extern** keyword moving the opening bracket to the header line always!
**Patch description:**
A new style added, new configuration flag - **BraceWrapping.AfterExternBlock** that allows us to decide whether we want a break before brace or not.
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37845
Contributed by @PriMee!
llvm-svn: 313354
Summary:
**Short overview:**
Fixed bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34001
Clang-format bug resulting in a strange behavior of control statements short blocks. Different flags combinations do not guarantee expected result. Turned on option AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine does not work as intended.
**Description of the problem:**
Cpp source file UnwrappedLineFormatter does not handle AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine flag as it should. Putting a single-line control statement without any braces, clang-format works as expected (depending on AllowShortIfStatementOnASingleLine or AllowShortLoopsOnASingleLine value). Putting a single-line control statement in braces, we can observe strange and incorrect behavior.
Our short block is intercepted by tryFitMultipleLinesInOne function. The function returns a number of lines to be merged. Unfortunately, our control statement block is not covered properly. There are several if-return statements, but none of them handles our block. A block is identified by the line first token and by left and right braces. A function block works as expected, there is such an if-return statement doing proper job. A control statement block, from the other hand, falls into strange conditional construct, which depends on BraceWrapping.AfterFunction flag (with condition that the line’s last token is left brace, what is possible in our case) or goes even further. That should definitely not happen.
**Description of the patch:**
By adding three different if statements, we guarantee that our short control statement block, however it looks like (different brace wrapping flags may be turned on), is handled properly and does not fall into wrong conditional construct. Depending on appropriate options we return either 0 (when something disturbs our merging attempt) or let another function (tryMergeSimpleBlock) take the responsibility of returned result (number of merged lines). Nevertheless, one more correction is required in mentioned tryMergeSimpleBlock function. The function, previously, returned either 0 or 2. The problem was that this did not handle the case when our block had the left brace in a separate line, not the header one. After change, after adding condition, we return the result compatible with block’s structure. In case of left brace in the header’s line we do everything as before the patch. In case of left brace in a separate line we do the job similar to the one we do in case of a “non-header left brace” function short block. To be precise, we try to merge the block ignoring the header line. Then, if success, we increment our returned result.
**After fix:**
**CONFIG:**
```
AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine: true
AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine: true
BreakBeforeBraces: Custom
BraceWrapping: {
AfterClass: true, AfterControlStatement: true, AfterEnum: true, AfterFunction: true, AfterNamespace: false, AfterStruct: true, AfterUnion: true, BeforeCatch: true, BeforeElse: true
}
```
**BEFORE:**
```
if (statement) doSomething();
if (statement) { doSomething(); }
if (statement) {
doSomething();
}
if (statement)
{
doSomething();
}
if (statement)
doSomething();
if (statement) {
doSomething1();
doSomething2();
}
```
**AFTER:**
```
if (statement) doSomething();
if (statement) { doSomething(); }
if (statement) { doSomething(); }
if (statement) { doSomething(); }
if (statement) doSomething();
if (statement)
{
doSomething1();
doSomething2();
}
```
Contributed by @PriMee!
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37140
llvm-svn: 312904
