Summary:
This patch adds a new function to lldbtest: `expect_expr`. This function is supposed to replace the current approach
of calling `expect`/`runCmd` with `expr`, `p` etc.
`expect_expr` allows evaluating expressions and matching their value/summary/type/error message without
having to do any string matching that might allow unintended passes (e.g., `self.expect("expr 3+4", substrs=["7"])`
can unexpectedly pass for results like `(Class7) $0 = 7`, `(int) $7 = 22`, `(int) $0 = 77` and so on).
This only uses the function in a few places to test and demonstrate it. I'll migrate the tests in follow up commits.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, shafik, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: christof, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70314
Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.
Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452
Summary:
As discussed on lldb-dev, this patch moves some LLDB tests into a hierarchy that more closely
resembles the commands we use in the LLDB interpreter. This patch should only move tests
that use the command interpreter and shouldn't touch any tests that primarily test the SB API.
Reviewers: #lldb, jfb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67033
llvm-svn: 370605
