gcc will say that the type of "this" is "T * const", clang "T *".
Compare the unqualified type names to erase the difference between the
two, as the constness is not a part of this test.
FWIW, I think that the gcc behavior makes more sense here.
llvm-svn: 326449
There's a bug in FindTypes, it ignores the exact flag if you pass a name that doesn't begin with
:: and pass eTypeClassAny for the type.
In this case we always know that the name we get from the vtable name is absolute so we can
work around the bug by prepending the "::". This doesn't fix the FindTypes bug.
<rdar://problem/38010986>
llvm-svn: 326412
Further investigation required; tests will be enabled on the buildbot
worker soon. Marking failing tests for now in order to start with a
green buildbot while investigation takes place.
This is a recommit of r326134, with the required import added.
llvm.org/pr36527
llvm-svn: 326166
Further investigation required; tests will be enabled on the buildbot
worker soon. Marking failing tests for now in order to start with a
green buildbot while investigation takes place.
llvm.org/pr36527
llvm-svn: 326134
Summary:
Update makefiles to specify -fPIC in Makefile.rules and only throw -fPIC when building a shared library. This change is necessary to allow building the lldb tests on Windows where -fPIC is not a valid option.
Update a few places to Python 3.x syntax
Reviewers: zturner, lldb-commits
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: stella.stamenova, labath, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42994
llvm-svn: 324671
This patch is the result of a discussion on lldb-dev, see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013111.html for
background.
For each test (should be eventually: each test configuration) a
separate build directory is created and we execute
make VPATH=$srcdir/path/to/test -C $builddir/path/to/test -f $srcdir/path/to/test/Makefile -I $srcdir/path/to/test
In order to make this work all LLDB tests need to be updated to find
the executable in the test build directory, since CWD still points at
the test's source directory, which is a requirement for unittest2.
Although we have done extensive testing, I'm expecting that this first
attempt will break a few bots. Please DO NOT HESITATE TO REVERT this
patch in order to get the bots green again. We will likely have to
iterate on this some more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281
llvm-svn: 323803
TestLibcxxListLoop - fails because the evil "define private public"
trick does not work with gmodules. The purpose of the test is not to
test debug info parsing so I just mark it as no_debug_info_testcase.
In the long term it may be interesting to write a mock std::list which
will allow us to test bad inputs to data formatters more easily.
TestGModules - seems to be a genuine bug. Filed pr36107 and xfailed.
llvm-svn: 323520
This test stresses expression evaluation support for template functions.
Currently the support is rudimentary, and running this test causes assertion
failures in clang. This test cannot be XFAIL'ed because the test harness
treats assertion failures as unexpected events. For now, the test must be
skipped.
llvm-svn: 322340
This fixes a bug in -gmodules DWARF handling when debugging without a .dSYM bundle
that was particularly noticable when debugging LLVM itself.
Debugging without clang modules and DWO handling should be unaffected by this patch.
<rdar://problem/32436209>
llvm-svn: 321802
Two tests were failing because the debugger was picking up multiply
defined internal symbols from the system libraries. This is a bug, as
there should be no ambiguity because the tests are defining variables
with should shadow these symbols, but lldb is not smart enough to figure
that out.
I work around the issue by renaming the variables in these tests, and in
exchange I create a self-contained test which reproduces the issue
without depending on the system libraries.
This increases the predictability of our test suite.
llvm-svn: 321271
I tested on x86-64 and Jason on embedded architectures.
This cleans up another couple of reported unexpected successes.
<rdar://problem/28623427>
llvm-svn: 320452
Summary:
This flag is on by default for darwin and freebsd, but off for linux.
Without it, clang will sometimes not emit debug info for types like
std::string. Whether it does this, and which tests will fail because of
that depends on the linux distro and c++ library version.
A bunch of tests were already setting these flags manually, but here
instead I take a whole sale approach and enable this flag for all tests.
Any test which does not want to have this flag (right now we have one
such test) can turn it off explicitly via
CFLAGS_EXTRAS+=$(LIMIT_DEBUG_INFO_FLAGS)
This fixes a bunch of data formatter tests on red-hat.
Reviewers: davide, jankratochvil
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, krytarowski, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40717
llvm-svn: 319653
The Linux xfail decorator was removed in r272326 with the claim that the
test "runs reliably on the linux x86 buildbot." It also runs reliably on
FreeBSD for me.
llvm.org/pr25925
llvm-svn: 310644
This reapplies https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740 with a tweak to find
the section by name rather than type. Section types don't distinguish
between regular sections and their DWO counterparts.
llvm-svn: 308905
The DWO handling code can get confused by clang modules which also use
skeleton CUs to point to the object file with the full debug
info. This patch detects whether an object is a "real" DWO or a clang
module and prevents LLDB from interpreting clang modules as DWO. This
fixes the regression in TestWithModuleDebugging.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=33875
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740
llvm-svn: 308850
This works on SVN but is a bit fragile on the Swift branch.
I'm adding the test to both, so we have this path covered.
<rdar://problem/32372372>
llvm-svn: 304314
Templates can end in parameter packs, like this
template <class T...> struct MyStruct
{ /*...*/ };
LLDB does not currently support these parameter packs;
it does not emit them into the template argument list
at all. This causes problems when you specialize, e.g.:
template <> struct MyStruct<int>
{ /*...*/ };
template <> struct MyStruct<int, int> : MyStruct<int>
{ /*...*/ };
LLDB generates two template specializations, each with
no template arguments, and then when they are imported
by the ASTImporter into a parser's AST context we get a
single specialization that inherits from itself,
causing Clang's record layout mechanism to smash its
stack.
This patch fixes the problem for classes and adds
tests. The tests for functions fail because Clang's
ASTImporter can't import them at the moment, so I've
xfailed that test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33025
llvm-svn: 302833
Many times a user wants to access a type when there's a variable of
the same name, or a variable when there's a type of the same name.
Depending on the precise context, currently the expression parser
can fail to resolve one or the other.
This is because ClangExpressionDeclMap has logic to limit the
amount of information it searches, and that logic sometimes cuts
down the search prematurely. This patch removes some of those early
exits.
In that sense, this patch trades performance (early exit is faster)
for correctness.
I've also included two new test cases showing examples of this
behavior – as well as modifying an existing test case that gets it
wrong.
llvm-svn: 301273
The test fails because an older clang did not emit the required debug
info (I am not sure when this got added, but clang-3.7 certainly did not
work yet). The actual platform has nothing to do with this.
llvm-svn: 300834
Fails with all versions of arm/aarch64 gcc available on ubuntu 16.04/14.04.
Passes with Linaro GCC version >= 4.8 but fails with >= 5.0. But There are other regressions when we use Linaro GCC.
llvm-svn: 286574
The debug info emitted by clang for static variables improved by
rL286302 and it exposed an incorrect test expactation because now LLDB
able to displays more data 9thanks to better debug info) then before.
llvm-svn: 286360
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Clang on ARM64 was making the three Function methods with identical bodies have
one implementation that was shared. That threw off the count of breakpoints, since
we don't count as separate locations three functions with the same address.
I also cleaned up the test case while I was at it.
<rdar://problem/27001915>
llvm-svn: 279800
Summary:
referencing a user-defined operator new was triggering an assert in clang because we were
registering the function name as string "operator new", instead of using the special operator
enum, which clang has for this purpose. Method operators already had code to handle this, and now
I extend this to cover free standing operator functions as well. Test included.
Reviewers: spyffe
Subscribers: sivachandra, paulherman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17856
llvm-svn: 278670
It's always hard to remember when to include this file, and
when you do include it it's hard to remember what preprocessor
check it needs to be behind, and then you further have to remember
whether it's windows.h or win32.h which you need to include.
This patch changes the name to PosixApi.h, which is more appropriately
named, and makes it independent of any preprocessor setting.
There's still the issue of people not knowing when to include this,
because there's not a well-defined set of things it exposes other
than "whatever is missing on Windows", but at least this should
make it less painful to fix when problems arise.
This patch depends on LLVM revision r278170.
llvm-svn: 278177
Summary:
One of the tests there does not work with gcc, so I'm spinning that off into a separate test, so
that we can XFAIL it with more granularity.
I am also renaming the test to reflect the fact that it no longer tests only integer arguments.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21923
llvm-svn: 274505
We were checking for integer types only before this. So I added the ability for CompilerType objects to check for integer and enum types.
Then I searched for places that were using the CompilerType::IsIntegerType(...) function. Many of these places also wanted to be checking for enumeration types as well, so I have fixed those places. These are in the ABI plug-ins where we are figuring out which arguments would go in where in regisers/stack when making a function call, or determining where the return value would live. The real fix for this is to use clang to compiler a CGFunctionInfo and then modify the code to be able to take the IR and a calling convention and have the backend answer the questions correctly for us so we don't need to create a really bad copy of the ABI in each plug-in, but that is beyond the scope of this bug fix.
Also added a test case to ensure this doesn't regress in the future.
llvm-svn: 273750
Prior to this we would display the typename for "TestObj<-1>" as "TestObj<4294967295>" when we showed the type. Expression parsing could also fail because we would fail to find the mangled name when evaluating expressions.
The issue was we were losing the signed'ness of the template integer parameter in DWARFASTParserClang.cpp.
<rdar://problem/25577041>
llvm-svn: 272434
This enables a couple of tests which have been shown to run reliably on the
linux x86 buildbot. If you see a failure after this commit, feel free to add
the xfail back, but please make it as specific as possible (i.e., try to make
it not cover i386/x86_64 with clang-3.5, clang-3.9 or gcc-4.9).
llvm-svn: 272326
If a lldbinline test's source file changed language, then the Makefile wasn't
updated. This was a problem if the Makefile was checked into the repository.
Now lldbinline.py always regenerates the Makefile and asserts if the
newly-generated version is not the same as the one already there. This ensures
that the repository will never be out of date without a buildbot failing.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21032
llvm-svn: 272024
Some compilers do not mark up C++ functions as extern "C" in the DWARF, so LLDB
has to fall back (if it is about to give up finding a symbol) to using the base
name of the function.
This fix also ensures that we search by full name rather than "auto," which
could cause unrelated C++ names to be found. Finally, it adds a test case.
<rdar://problem/25094302>
llvm-svn: 271551
This change adds the capability of building test inferiors
with the -gmodules flag to enable module debug info support.
Windows is excluded per @zturner.
Reviewers: granata.enrico, aprantl, zturner, labath
Subscribers: zturner, labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19998
llvm-svn: 270848
Summary:
using stdio in tests does not work on windows, and it is not completely reliable on linux.
Avoid using stdio in this test, as it is not necessary for this purpose.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, zturner
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20567
llvm-svn: 270831
Remove XFAIL from some tests that now pass.
Add XFAIL to some tests that now fail.
Fix a crasher where a null pointer check isn't guarded.
Properly handle all types of errors in SymbolFilePDB.
llvm-svn: 269454
1. Fixed semicolon placement in the lambda in the test itself.
2. Fixed lldbinline tests in general so that we don't attempt tests on platforms that don't use the given type of debug info. (For example, no DWO tests on Windows.) This fixes one of the two failures on Windows. (TestLambdas.py was the only inline test that wasn't XFailed or skipped on Windows.)
3. Set the error string in IRInterpreter::CanInterpret so that the caller doesn't print (null) instead of an explanation. I don't entirely understand the error, so feel free to suggest a better wording.
4. XFailed the test on Windows. The interpreter won't evaluate the lambda because the module has multiple function bodies. I don't exactly understand why that's a problem for the interpreter nor why the problem arises only on Windows.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19606
llvm-svn: 268573
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration
in 'foo' member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 268083
This reverts commit r267833 as it breaks the build. It looks like some work in progress got
committed together with the actual fix, but I'm not sure which one is which, so I'll revert the
whole patch and let author resumbit it after fixing the build error.
llvm-svn: 267861
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration in 'foo'
member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 267833
A number of test cases were failing on big-endian systems simply due to
byte order assumptions in the tests themselves, and no underlying bug
in LLDB.
These two test cases:
tools/lldb-server/lldbgdbserverutils.py
python_api/process/TestProcessAPI.py
actually check for big-endian target byte order, but contain Python errors
in the corresponding code paths.
These test cases:
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-python-synth/TestDataFormatterPythonSynth.py
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-smart-array/TestDataFormatterSmartArray.py
functionalities/data-formatter/synthcapping/TestSyntheticCapping.py
lang/cpp/frame-var-anon-unions/TestFrameVariableAnonymousUnions.py
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (first change)
could be fixed to check for big-endian target byte order and update the
expected result strings accordingly. For the two synthetic tests, I've
also updated the source to make sure the fake_a value is always nonzero
on both big- and little-endian platforms.
These test case:
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (second change)
functionalities/memory/cache/TestMemoryCache.py
simply accessed memory with the wrong size, which wasn't noticed on LE
but fails on BE.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18985
llvm-svn: 266315
the main reason is that our decorator contains extra fluff to "expect" crashes (which seem to
happen occasionaly on the android buildbot).
llvm-svn: 263633
The inlining semantics for C and C++ are different, which affects the test's expectation of the number of times the function should appear in the binary. In the case of this test, C semantics means there should be three instances of inner_inline, while C++ semantics means there should be only two.
On Windows, clang uses C++ inline semantics even for C code, and there doesn't seem to be a combination of compiler flags to avoid this.
So, for consistency, I've recast the test to use C++ everywhere. Since the test resided under lang/c, it seemed appropriate to move it to lang/cpp.
This does not address the other XFAIL for this test on Linux/gcc. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17650
llvm-svn: 262255
Both Linux and FreeBSD had a comment "This needs to be root-caused."
It looks like the failure has been fixed on both, and the Linux XFAIL
decorator was removed in r233716 (Mar 2015).
llvm-svn: 261333
CFLAGS is now being set correctly to pass -flimit-debug-info or
-fno-limit-debug-info on FreeBSD. I'm not sure which change is
responsible for the fix, though.
llvm.org/pr25626
llvm-svn: 260330
* Change the `not_in` function to be called `no_match`. This makes
it clear that keyword arguments can be more than just lists.
* Change the name of `_check_list_or_lambda` to
`_match_decorator_property`. Again clarifying that decorator params
are not always lists.
* Always use a regex match when matching strings. This allows automatic
support for regex matching on all decorator properties. Also support
compiled regex values.
* Fix a bug in the compiler check used by _decorateTest. The two
arguments were reversed, the condition was always wrong.
* Change one test that uses skipUnlessArch to use skipIf, to
demonstrate that skipIf can now handle more scenarios.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16938
llvm-svn: 260135
expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general
expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally,
by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue
of having to support decorators that can be called with or without
arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments,
and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition
you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation
of the decorators can become much simpler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936
llvm-svn: 260134
Summary:
This reverts commit 8af14b5f9af68c31ac80945e5b5d56f0a14b38e4.
Reverting as it breaks a few tests on Mac.
Reviewers: spyffe
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16895
llvm-svn: 259823
Summary:
While evaluating expressions when stopped in a class method, there was a
problem of member variables hiding local variables. This was happening
because, in the context of a method, clang already knew about member
variables with their name and assumed that they were the only variables
with those names in scope. Consequently, clang never checks with LLDB
about the possibility of local variables with the same name and goes
wrong. This change addresses the problem by using an artificial
namespace "$__lldb_local_vars". All local variables in scope are
declared in the "$__lldb_expr" method as follows:
using $__lldb_local_vars::<local var 1>;
using $__lldb_local_vars::<local var 2>;
...
This hides the member variables with the same name and forces clang to
enquire about the variables which it thinks are declared in
$__lldb_local_vars. When LLDB notices that clang is enquiring about
variables in $__lldb_local_vars, it looks up local vars and conveys
their information if found. This way, member variables do not hide local
variables, leading to correct evaluation of expressions.
A point to keep in mind is that the above solution does not solve the
problem for one specific case:
namespace N
{
int a;
}
class A
{
public:
void Method();
int a;
};
void
A::Method()
{
using N::a;
...
// Since the above solution only touches locals, it does not
// force clang to enquire about "a" coming from namespace N.
}
Reviewers: clayborg, spyffe
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16746
llvm-svn: 259810
This doesn't attempt to move every decorator. The reason for
this is that it requires touching every single test file to import
decorators.py. I would like to do this in a followup patch, but
in the interest of keeping the patches as bite-sized as possible,
I've only attempted to move the underlying common decorators first.
A few tests call these directly, so those tests are updated as part
of this patch.
llvm-svn: 259807
This patch attempts to solve the Python 2 / Python 3 incompatibilities by
introducing a new `encoded_file` abstraction that we use instead of
`io.open()`. The problem with the builtin implementation of `io.open` is
that `read` and `write` accept and return `unicode` objects, which are not
always convenient to work with in Python 2. We solve this by making
`encoded_file.open()` return the same object returned by `io.open()` but
with hooked `read()` and `write()` methods. These hooked methods will
accept binary or text data, and conditionally convert what it gets to a
`unicode` object using the correct encoding. When calling `read()` it
also does any conversion necessary to convert the output back into the
native `string` type of the running python version.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16736
llvm-svn: 259379
Instead of opening the file in unicode mode, we need only encode
data which potentially has non-ASCII characters as UTF8 before
writing. This should work across both Python versions, and is
also far simpler than anything else discussed.
llvm-svn: 258969
Previously we were writing in the default encoding, which depends
on the operating system and is not guaranteed to be unicode aware.
On Python 3, this would lead to a situation where writing unicode
text to the log file generates an exception. The fix here is to
write session logs using the proper encoding, which incidentally
fixes another test, so xfail is removed from that.
llvm-svn: 258759
Starting with Windows 10, the Windows loader is itself multi-threaded,
meaning that the loader spins up a few threads to do process
initialization before it executes main. Windows delivers these
notifications asynchronously and they can come out of order, so
we can't be sure that the first thread we get a notification about
is actually the zero'th thread.
This patch fixes this by requesting the thread stopped at the
breakpoint that was specified, rather than getting thread 0 and
verifying that it is stopped at a breakpoint.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16247
llvm-svn: 258432
