nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
a dependent template name rather than (indirectly and incorrectly)
trying to determine whether we can compute a context for the
nested-name-specifier. Fixes a GCC testsuite regression,
<rdar://problem/9068589>.
llvm-svn: 126749
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
DependentNameTypeLoc. Teach the recursive AST visitor and libclang how to
walk DependentNameTypeLoc nodes.
Also, teach libclang about TypedefDecl source ranges, so that we get
those. The massive churn in test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp
is a good thing: we're annotating a lot more of this test correctly
now.
llvm-svn: 126729
source-location information. We don't actually preserve this
information in any of the resulting TypeLocs (yet), so it doesn't
matter.
llvm-svn: 126693
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr.
Also, improve the computation that checks whether the base of a member
expression (either unresolved or dependent-scoped) is implicit. The
previous check didn't cover all of the cases we use in our
representation, which threw off source-location information for these
expressions (which, in turn, caused some breakage in libclang's token
annotation).
llvm-svn: 126681
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, and clean up instantiation of
nested-name-specifiers with dependent template specialization types in
the process.
llvm-svn: 126663
dependent template names. There is still a lot of redundant code in
TreeTransform to cope with TemplateSpecializationTypes, which I'll
remove in stages.
llvm-svn: 126656
specifiers such as
typename T::template apply<U>
Previously, we would turn T::template apply<U> into a
TemplateSpecializationType. Then, we'd reprocess that
TemplateSpecializationType and turn it into either a
TemplateSpecializationType wrapped in an ElaboratedType (when we could
resolve "apply" to a template declaration) or a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType. We now produce the same ASTs but
without generating the intermediate TemplateSpecializationType.
The end goal here is to avoid generating TemplateSpecializationTypes
with dependent template-names, ever. We're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 126589
UnresolvedUsingValueDecl to use NestedNameSpecifierLoc rather than the
extremely-lossy NestedNameSpecifier/SourceRange pair it used to use,
improving source-location information.
Various infrastructure updates to support NestedNameSpecifierLoc:
- AST/PCH (de-)serialization
- Recursive AST visitor
- libclang traversal (including the first tests of this
functionality)
llvm-svn: 126459
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
way it keeps track of namespaces. Previously, we would map from the
namespace alias to its underlying namespace when building a
nested-name-specifier, losing source information in the process.
llvm-svn: 126358
includes explicitly-specified template arguments) to a function
template specialization in cases where no deduction is performed or
deduction fails. Patch by Faisal Vali, fixes PR7505!
llvm-svn: 126048
enumeration type, we were generating an integer literal implicitly
casted to the appropriate enumeration type. However, later checks on
that expression would strip the implicit cast.
This commit tweaks the lame hack, by creating an explicit cast instead
of an implicit cast. The right answer is to introduce a
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr expression that acts like the substituted
result. I'll investigate that soon.
llvm-svn: 125818
it's okay for the following template parameters to not have default
arguments (since those template parameters can still be
deduced). Also, downgrade the error about default template arguments
in function templates to an extension warning, since this is a
harmless C++0x extension.
llvm-svn: 124855
argument but doesn't (because previous template parameters had default
arguments), clear out all of the default arguments so that we maintain
the invariant that a template parameter has a default argument only if
subsequence template parameters also have default arguments.
Fixes a crash-on-invalid <rdar://problem/8913649>.
llvm-svn: 124345
derived-to-base cast that also casts away constness (one of the cases
for static_cast followed by const_cast) would be treated as a bit-cast
rather than a derived-to-base class, causing miscompiles and
heartburn.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8913298>.
llvm-svn: 124340
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.
[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.
llvm-svn: 124211
implementation used by overload resolution to support rvalue
references. The original commits caused PR9026 and some
hard-to-reproduce self-host breakage.
The only (crucial!) difference between this commit and the previous
commits is that we now properly check the SuppressUserConversions flag
before attempting to perform a second user-defined conversion in
reference binding, breaking the infinite recursion chain of
user-defined conversions.
Rvalue references should be working a bit better now.
llvm-svn: 124121
resolution to match the latest C++0x working paper's semantics. The
implementation now matching up with the reference-binding
implementation used for initialization.
llvm-svn: 123977
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
number of explicit call arguments. This actually fixes an erroneous
test for [temp.deduct.partial]p11, where we were considering
parameters corresponding to arguments beyond those that were
explicitly provided.
llvm-svn: 123244
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
expansions with something that is easier to use correctly: a new
template argment kind, rather than a bit on an existing kind. Update
all of the switch statements that deal with template arguments, fixing
a few latent bugs in the process. I"m happy with this representation,
now.
And, oh look! Template instantiation and deduction work for template
template argument pack expansions.
llvm-svn: 122896
for template template argument pack expansions. This allows fun such
as:
template<template<class> class ...> struct apply_impl { /*...*/ };
template<template<class> class ...Metafunctions> struct apply {
typedef typename apply_impl<Metafunctions...>::type type;
};
However, neither template argument deduction nor template
instantiation is implemented for template template argument packs, so
this functionality isn't useful yet.
I'll probably replace the encoding of template template
argument pack expansions in TemplateArgument so that it's harder to
accidentally forget about the expansion. However, this is a step in
the right general direction.
llvm-svn: 122890
specializations. We weren't dealing with any of the cases where the
type of the non-type template argument differs from the type of the
corresponding template parameter in the primary template. We would
think that the template parameter in the partial specialization was
not deducible (and warn about it, incorrectly), then fail to convert a
deduced parameter to the type of the template parameter in the partial
specialization (which may involve truncation, among other
things). Fixes PR8905.
llvm-svn: 122851
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
parameter packs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p13), including disambiguation between
unnamed function parameter packs and varargs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p14) for
cases like
void f(T...)
where T may or may not contain unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122520
specialization's template arguments against the primary template's
template arguments using the obvious, correct method of checking the
injected-class-name type (C++ [temp.class.spec]p9b3). The previous
incarnation of this comparison attempted to use its own formulation of
the injected-class-name, which is redudant and, with the introduction
of variadic templates, became wrong (again).
llvm-svn: 122508
to cope with parameter packs. This is a band-aid I will be
revisiting this section when I implement declaration matching
semantics for variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 122369
whose patterns are template arguments. We can now instantiate, e.g.,
typedef tuple<pair<OuterTypes, InnerTypes>...> type;
where OuterTypes and InnerTypes are template type parameter packs.
There is a horrible inefficiency in
TemplateArgumentLoc::getPackExpansionPattern(), where we need to
create copies of TypeLoc data because our interfaces traffic in
TypeSourceInfo pointers where they should traffic in TypeLocs
instead. I've isolated in efficiency in this one routine; once we
refactor our interfaces to traffic in TypeLocs, we can eliminate it.
llvm-svn: 122278
a parameter pack, check the parameter pack against each of the
template arguments it corresponds to, then pack the converted
arguments into a template argument pack. Allows us to use variadic
class templates so long as instantiation isn't required, e.g.,
template<typename... Types> struct Tuple;
Tuple<int, float> *t2;
llvm-svn: 122251
area of printing template arguments. The functionality changes here
are limited to cases of variadic templates that aren't yet enabled.
llvm-svn: 122250
pack expansions, e.g. given
template<typename... Types> struct tuple;
template<typename... Types>
struct tuple_of_refs {
typedef tuple<Types&...> types;
};
the type of the "types" typedef is a PackExpansionType whose pattern
is Types&.
This commit introduces support for creating pack expansions for
template type arguments, as above, but not for any other kind of pack
expansion, nor for any form of instantiation.
llvm-svn: 122223
non-type template parameters until we know that we have an actual
template declaration of some sort. This cannot be tested yet, but will
become important when we have template template parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121967
BuildExpressionFromIntegralTemplateArgument can produce malformed
IntegerLiterals with an EnumType if the template parameter type
is an EnumType. This breaks the AST printer which expects all
IntegerLiterals to have a plain integer type. Instead, give the
IntegerLiteral the enum's promotion type and wrap in an implicit cast
to the EnumType.
llvm-svn: 121862
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
We should not substitute template types if the template has a dependent
context because the template argument stack is not yet fully formed.
Instead, defer substitution until the template has a non-dependent
context (i.e. instantiation of an outer template).
llvm-svn: 121491
space better. Remove this reference. To make that work, change some APIs
(most importantly, getDesugaredType()) to take an ASTContext& if they
need to return a QualType. Simultaneously, diminish the need to return a
QualType by introducing some useful APIs on SplitQualType, which is
just a std::pair<const Type *, Qualifiers>.
llvm-svn: 121478
declaration that is a value in ill-formed code. Instead of crashing,
treat this as a dependent typename specifier and suggest that the
using add "typename" into the using declaration. Fixes <rdar://problem/8740998>.
llvm-svn: 121322
zextOrTrunc(), and APSInt methods extend(), extOrTrunc() and new method
trunc(), to be const and to return a new value instead of modifying the
object in place.
llvm-svn: 121121
- Default argument expressions pick up the value kind of the incoming
expression, not the value kind of the parameter it initializes.
- When building a template argument for substitution, A::x is an rvalue
if x is an instance method.
- Anonymous struct/union paths pick up value kind the same way that
normal member accesses do; extract out a common code path for this.
Enable the value-kind assertion, now that it passes self-host.
llvm-svn: 120055
store it on the expression node. Also store an "object kind",
which distinguishes ordinary "addressed" l-values (like
variable references and pointer dereferences) and bitfield,
@property, and vector-component l-values.
Currently we're not using these for much, but I aim to switch
pretty much everything calculating l-valueness over to them.
For now they shouldn't necessarily be trusted.
llvm-svn: 119685
abstractions (e.g., TemplateArgumentListBuilder) that were designed to
support variadic templates. Only a few remnants of variadic templates
remain, in the parser (parsing template type parameter packs), AST
(template type parameter pack bits and TemplateArgument::Pack), and
Sema; these are expected to be used in a future implementation of
variadic templates.
But don't get too excited about that happening now.
llvm-svn: 118385
themselves have no template parameters. This is actually a restriction
due to the grammar of template template parameters, but we choose to
diagnose it in Sema to provide better recovery.
llvm-svn: 117032
by marking the decl invalid isn't. Make some steps towards supporting these
and then hastily shut them down at the last second by marking them as
unsupported.
llvm-svn: 116661
unnamed or local types within that type. This bit is cached along with
the linkage of a type, so that it can be recomputed (e.g., when we see
that a typedef has given a name to an anonymous declaration).
Use this bit when checking C++03 [temp.arg.type]p2, so that we don't
walk template argument types repeatedly.
llvm-svn: 116413
that are suppressed during template argument deduction. This change
queues diagnostics computed during template argument deduction. Then,
if the resulting function template specialization or partial
specialization is chosen by overload resolution or partial ordering
(respectively), we will emit the queued diagnostics at that point.
This addresses most of PR6784. However, the check for unnamed/local
template arguments (which existed before this change) is still only
skin-deep, and needs to be extended to look deeper into types. It must
be improved to finish PR6784.
llvm-svn: 116373
of templated-scope friends by marking them invalid and white-listing all
accesses until such time as we implement them. Fixes a crash, this time
without a broken test case.
llvm-svn: 116364
error to a warning if we're in a case that would be allowed in
C++0x. This "fixes" PR8084 by making Clang accept more code than GCC
and (non-strict) EDG do.
Also, add the missing test case for the C++0x semantics, which should
have been in r113717.
llvm-svn: 113718
libclang. This includes:
- Cursor kind for function templates, with visitation logic
- Cursor kinds for template parameters, with visitation logic
- Visitation logic for template specialization types, qualified type
locations
- USR generation for function templates, template specialization
types, template parameter types.
Also happens to fix PR7804, which I tripped across while testing.
llvm-svn: 112604
For large floats/integers, APFloat/APInt will allocate memory from the heap to represent these numbers.
Unfortunately, when we use a BumpPtrAllocator to allocate IntegerLiteral/FloatingLiteral nodes the memory associated with
the APFloat/APInt values will never get freed.
I introduce the class 'APNumericStorage' which uses ASTContext's allocator for memory allocation and is used internally by FloatingLiteral/IntegerLiteral.
Fixes rdar://7637185
llvm-svn: 112361
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
templates when only the declaration is in scope. This requires deferring the
instantiation to be lazy, and ensuring the definition is required for that
translation unit. We re-use the existing pending instantiation queue,
previously only used to track implicit instantiations which were required to be
lazy. Fixes PR7979.
A subsequent change will rename *PendingImplicitInstantiations to
*PendingInstatiations for clarity given its broader role.
llvm-svn: 112037
- move DeclSpec &c into the Sema library
- move ParseAST into the Parse library
Reflect this change in a thousand different includes.
Reflect this change in the link orders.
llvm-svn: 111667
Now all classes derived from Attr are generated from TableGen.
Additionally, Attr* is no longer its own linked list; SmallVectors or
Attr* are used. The accompanying LLVM commit contains the updates to
TableGen necessary for this.
Some other notes about newly-generated attribute classes:
- The constructor arguments are a SourceLocation and a Context&,
followed by the attributes arguments in the order that they were
defined in Attr.td
- Every argument in Attr.td has an appropriate accessor named getFoo,
and there are sometimes a few extra ones (such as to get the length
of a variadic argument).
Additionally, specific_attr_iterator has been introduced, which will
iterate over an AttrVec, but only over attributes of a certain type. It
can be accessed through either Decl::specific_attr_begin/end or
the global functions of the same name.
llvm-svn: 111455
Unused warnings for functions:
-static functions
-functions in anonymous namespace
-class methods in anonymous namespace
-class method specializations in anonymous namespace
-function specializations in anonymous namespace
Unused warnings for variables:
-static variables
-variables in anonymous namespace
-static data members in anonymous namespace
-static data members specializations in anonymous namespace
Reveals lots of opportunities for dead code removal in llvm codebase that will
interest my esteemed colleagues.
llvm-svn: 111086
qua templates. The current fix suppresses the access check entirely
in this case; to do better, we'd need to be able to say that a
particular lookup result came from a particular injected class name,
which is not easy to do with the current representation of LookupResult.
This is on my known-problems list.
llvm-svn: 111009
just means "not a function type", not "not a function type or void". This
changes behavior slightly, but generally in a way which accepts more code.
llvm-svn: 110303
leaks though) and add methods to its interface for adding/finding specializations.
Simplifies its users a bit and we no longer need to replace specializations in the folding set with
their redeclarations. We just return the most recent redeclarations.
As a bonus, it fixes http://llvm.org/PR7670.
llvm-svn: 108832
expression such as the "foo" in "this->blah.foo<1, 2>", and we can't
look into the type of "this->blah" (e.g., because it is dependent),
look into the local scope of a template of the same name. Fixes
<rdar://problem/8198511>.
llvm-svn: 108531
definition, we're likely going to end up breaking the invariants of
the template system, e.g., that the depths of template parameter lists
match up with the nesting template of the template. So, make sure we
mark such ill-formed declarations as invalid or don't even build them
at all.
llvm-svn: 108372
class templates within class scope (which is ill-formed), and recover
by dropping the explicit specialization entirely. Fixes the infinite
loop in PR7622.
llvm-svn: 108217
parameters starts at the end of the template-parameter rather than at
the point where the template parameter name is encounted. For example,
given:
typedef unsigned char T;
template<typename T = T> struct X0 { };
The "T" in the default argument refers to the typedef of "unsigned
char", rather than referring to the newly-introduced template type
parameter 'T'.
Addresses <rdar://problem/8122812>.
llvm-svn: 107354
(or operator-function-id) as a template, but the context is actually
non-dependent or the current instantiation, allow us to use knowledge
of what kind of template it is, e.g., type template vs. function
template, for further syntactic disambiguation. This allows us to
parse properly in the presence of stray "template" keywords, which is
necessary in C++0x and it's good recovery in C++98/03.
llvm-svn: 106167
disambiguation keywords outside of templates in C++98/03. Previously,
the warning would fire when the associated nested-name-specifier was
not dependent, but that was a misreading of the C++98/03 standard:
now, we complain only when we're outside of any template.
llvm-svn: 106161
introduced by using decls are hidden even if their template parameter lists
or return types differ from the "overriding" declaration.
Propagate using shadow declarations around more effectively when looking up
template-ids. Reperform lookup for template-ids in member expressions so that
access control is properly set up.
Fix some number of latent bugs involving template-ids with totally invalid
base types. You can only actually get these with a scope specifier, since
otherwise the template-id won't parse as a template-id.
Fixes PR7384.
llvm-svn: 106093
in C++ that involve both integral and enumeration types. Convert all
of the callers to Type::isIntegralType() that are meant to work with
both integral and enumeration types over to
Type::isIntegralOrEnumerationType(), to prepare to eliminate
enumeration types as integral types.
llvm-svn: 106071
case of an elaborated-type-specifier like 'typename A<T>::foo', and
DependentTemplateSpecializationType represents the case of an
elaborated-type-specifier like 'typename A<T>::template B<T>'. The TypeLoc
representation of a DependentTST conveniently exactly matches that of an
ElaboratedType wrapping a TST.
Kill off the explicit rebuild methods for RebuildInCurrentInstantiation;
the standard implementations work fine because the nested name specifier
is computable in the newly-entered context.
llvm-svn: 105801
a member template, and you try to call the member template with an explicit
template argument. See PR7247
For example, this downgrades the error to a warning in:
template<typename T> struct set{};
struct Value {
template<typename T>
void set(T value) {
}
};
void foo() {
Value v;
v.set<double>(3.2); // Warning here.
}
llvm-svn: 105518
VLA restrictions so that one can use VLAs in templates (even
accidentally), but not as part of a non-type template parameter (which
would be very bad).
llvm-svn: 104471
in several important ways:
- VLAs of non-POD types are not permitted.
- VLAs cannot be used in conjunction with C++ templates.
These restrictions are intended to keep VLAs out of the parts of the
C++ type system where they cause the most trouble. Fixes PR5678 and
<rdar://problem/8013618>.
llvm-svn: 104443
the required "template" keyword, using the same heuristics we do for
dependent template names in member access expressions, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:11:8: error: use 'template'
keyword to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
T::getAs<U>();
^
template
Fixes PR5404.
llvm-svn: 104409
that is missing the 'template' keyword, e.g.,
t->getAs<T>()
where getAs is a member of an unknown specialization. C++ requires
that we treat "getAs" as a value, but that would fail to parse since T
is the name of a type. We would then fail at the '>', since a type
cannot be followed by a '>'.
This is a very common error for C++ programmers to make, especially
since GCC occasionally allows it when it shouldn't (as does Visual
C++). So, when we are in this case, we use tentative parsing to see if
the tokens starting at "<" can only be parsed as a template argument
list. If so, we produce a diagnostic with a fix-it that states that
the 'template' keyword is needed:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:5:8: error: 'template' keyword
is required to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
t->getAs<T>();
^
template
This is just a start of this patch; I'd like to apply the same
approach to everywhere that a template-id with dependent template name
can be parsed.
llvm-svn: 104406
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions.
The new scheme:
- For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
to/through a virtual base class, etc.
- For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
- For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
member functions when needed.
- At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
vtables lazily).
From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).
Notes:
(1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
the larger tests from these issues.
(2) Some diagnostics related to
implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
way.
(3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
vtable.
Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.
llvm-svn: 103718
explicit instantiations of template. C++0x clarifies the intent
(they're ill-formed in some cases; see [temp.explicit] for
details). However, one could squint at the C++98/03 standard and
conclude they are permitted, so reduce the error to a warning
(controlled by -Wc++0x-compat) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 103482
different tag kind ("struct" vs. "class") than the primary template,
which has an affect on access control.
Should fix the last remaining Boost.Accumulors failure.
llvm-svn: 103144
ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() only annotates the subset of
template-ids which are not subject to lexical ambiguity. Add support
for the more general case in ParseUnqualifiedId() to handle cases
such as A::template B().
Also improve some diagnostic locations.
Fixes PR7030, from Alp Toker!
llvm-svn: 103081
parameter with pointer-to-member type, we may have to perform a
qualification conversion, since the pointee type of the parameter
might be more qualified than the pointee type of the argument we form
from the declaration. Fixes PR6986.
llvm-svn: 102777
of the mapping from local declarations to their instantiated
counterparts during template instantiation. Previously, we tried to do
some unholy merging of local instantiation scopes that involved
storing a single hash table along with an "undo" list on the
side... which was ugly, and never handled function parameters
properly.
Now, we just keep separate hash tables for each local instantiation
scope, and "combining" two scopes means that we'll look in each of the
combined hash tables. The combined scope stack is rarely deep, and
this makes it easy to avoid the "undo" issues we were hitting. Also,
I've simplified the logic for function parameters: if we're declaring
a function and we need the function parameters to live longer, we just
push them back into the local instantiation scope where we need them.
Fixes PR6990.
llvm-svn: 102732
specializations, which keeps track of the order in which they were
originally declared. We use this number so that we can always walk the
list of partial specializations in a predictable order during matching
or template instantiation. This also fixes a failure in Boost.Proto,
where SourceManager::isBeforeInTranslationUnit was behaving
poorly in inconsistent ways.
llvm-svn: 102693
entering the current instantiation. Set up a little to preserve type location
information for typename types while we're in there.
Fixes a Boost failure.
llvm-svn: 102673
bindings when the template argument is still an expression; it happens
while checking the template arguments of a class template partial
specializations. Fixes PR6964.
llvm-svn: 102595
of a class template or class template partial specialization. That is to
say, in
template <class T> class A { ... };
or
template <class T> class B<const T*> { ... };
make 'A<T>' and 'B<const T*>' sugar for the corresponding InjectedClassNameType
when written inside the appropriate context. This allows us to track the
current instantiation appropriately even inside AST routines. It also allows
us to compute a DeclContext for a type much more efficiently, at some extra
cost every time we write a template specialization (which can be optimized,
but I've left it simple in this patch).
llvm-svn: 102407
when they are not complete (since we could not match them up to
anything) and ensuring that enum parsing can cope with dependent
elaborated-type-specifiers. Fixes PR6915 and PR6649.
llvm-svn: 102247
(e.g., no typename, enum, class, etc.), e.g., because the context is
one that is known to refer to a type. Patch from Enea Zaffanella!
llvm-svn: 102243
a qualified name. We weren't checking for an empty
nested-name-specifier when dealing with friend class templates
(although we were checking in the other places where we deal with this
paragraph). Fixes a Boost.Serialization showstopper.
llvm-svn: 101724
intended for redeclarations, fixing those that need it. Fixes PR6831.
This uncovered an issue where the C++ type-specifier-seq parsing logic
would try to perform name lookup on an identifier after it already had
a type-specifier, which could also lead to spurious ambiguity errors
(as in PR6831, but with a different test case).
llvm-svn: 101419
in case it ends up doing something that might trigger diagnostics
(template instantiation, ambiguity reporting, access
reporting). Noticed while working on PR6831.
llvm-svn: 101412
ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction when asked to complain. Previously,
we had some weird handshake where ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction
expected its caller to handle some of the diagnostics but not others,
and yet there was no way for the caller to know which case we were
in. Eliminate this madness, fixing <rdar://problem/7765884>.
llvm-svn: 101312
generally recover from typos in keywords (since we would effectively
have to mangle the token stream). However, there are still benefits to
typo-correcting with keywords:
- We don't make stupid suggestions when the user typed something
that is similar to a keyword.
- We can suggest the keyword in a diagnostic (did you mean
"static_cast"?), even if we can't recover and therefore don't have
a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 101274
name-lookup ambiguities when there are multiple base classes that are
all specializations of the same class template. This is part of a
general cleanup for ambiguities in template-name lookup. Fixes
PR6717.
llvm-svn: 101065
specializations when the explicit instantiation was... explicitly
written, i.e., not the product of an explicit instantiation of an
enclosing class. Fixes this spurious warning when Clang builds LLVM:
/Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineDominators.cpp:22:1:
warning: explicit instantiation of 'addRoot' that occurs after an
explicit specialization will be ignored (C++0x extension) [-pedantic]
llvm-svn: 100900
