rL357954 did increase `packet-timeout` 1sec -> 5secs. Which is IMO about the
maximum timeout reasonable for regular use. But for testsuite I think the
timeout should be higher as the testsuite runs in parallel and it can be run
even on slow hosts and with other load (moreover if it runs on some slow arch).
I have chosen 60 secs, that should be enough hopefully. Larger value could
make debugging with hanging `lldb-server` annoying.
This patch was based on this testsuite timeout:
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-x86_64-fedora/builds/546/steps/test/logs/stdio
FAIL: test_connect (TestGDBRemoteClient.TestGDBRemoteClient)
Test connecting to a remote gdb server
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/jkratoch/slave-lldb-x86_64-fedora/lldb-x86_64-fedora/llvm/tools/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/TestGDBRemoteClient.py", line 13, in test_connect
process = self.connect(target)
File "/home/jkratoch/slave-lldb-x86_64-fedora/lldb-x86_64-fedora/llvm/tools/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/gdb_remote_client/gdbclientutils.py", line 480, in connect
self.assertTrue(error.Success(), error.description)
AssertionError: False is not True : failed to get reply to handshake packet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65271
llvm-svn: 367234
D55859 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55859> has no effect for some of the
testcases so this patch extends it even for (all?) other testcases known to me.
LLDB was failing when LLDB prints errors reading system debug infos
(`*-debuginfo.rpm`, DWZ-optimized) which should never happen as LLDB testcases
should not be affected by system debug infos.
`lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/api/multithreaded/driver.cpp.template` is
using only SB API which does not expose `ModuleList` so I had to call
`HandleCommand()` there.
`lldb-test.cpp` could also use `HandleCommand` and then there would be no need
for `ModuleListProperties::SetEnableExternalLookup()` but I think it is cleaner
with API and not on based on text commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63339
llvm-svn: 363567
We're seeing some very occasional failures in these tests where the
mini-driver dies with a SIGPIPE. We don't use SIGPIPE for anything, and
the main lldb driver program already ignores SIGPIPE, so ignoring it in
the mini-driver is a good way to remove these spurious failures.
<rdar://problem/29740488>
llvm-svn: 290216
Summary:
Convert tests using LLDB headers to use generateSource to put the right include paths in place regardless of whether or not you're building a framework.
This also abstracted generateSource out of TestPublicAPIHeaders.py into lldbtest.py.
Reviewers: tfiala, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25887
llvm-svn: 285542
This reverts commit r285357.
I committed this patch accidentally out of order. Will recommit when the change this depends on is landed.
llvm-svn: 285361
Summary:
Convert tests using LLDB headers to use generateSource to put the right include paths in place regardless of whether or not you're building a framework.
This also abstracted generateSource out of TestPublicAPIHeaders.py into lldbtest.py.
Reviewers: tfiala, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25887
llvm-svn: 285357
