This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of several different bugs. A couple of the bugs are now resolved as fixed since all the tests that were failing associated with the bug are now passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349713
Summary:
The test suite has often unnecessary trailing whitespace, and sometimes
unnecessary trailing lines or a missing final new line. This patch just strips
trailing whitespace/lines and adds missing newlines at the end.
Subscribers: ki.stfu, JDevlieghere, christof, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49943
llvm-svn: 338171
This is a resubmit of r303732, which was reverted due to a regression.
The original patch caused a regression in TestLoadUnload, which has only showed
up when running the remote test suite. The problem there was that we interrupted
the target just as it has hit the rendezvous breakpoint in the dlopen call. This
meant that the stop reason was set to "breakpoint" even though the event would
not have been broadcast if we had not stopped the process. I fix this by
checking StopInfo->ShouldNotify() before stopping.
I also add a new test for the handling of conditional breakpoints in
expressions, which I noticed to be broken (pr33164)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33283
llvm-svn: 303848
Summary:
The function had logic to handle the case when the expression terminated
while we were trying to halt the process, but it failed to take into
account the possibility that the expression stopped because it hit a
breakpoint. This was caused by the fact that the handling of the stopped
events was duplicated for the "halting" and regular cases (the regular
case handled this situation correctly). I've tried to merge these two
cases into one to make sure they stay in sync.
I should call out that the two cases were checking whether the thread
plan has completed in slightly different ways. I am not sure what is the
difference between them, but I think the check should be the same in
both cases, whatever it is, so I just took the one from the regular
case, as that is probably more tested.
For the test, I modified TestUnwindExpression to run the expression with
a smaller timeout (this is how I found this bug originally). With a 1ms
one thread timeout, the test failed consistently without this patch.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33283
llvm-svn: 303732
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
